IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v114y2018ipbp303-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A utility-based dynamic demand estimation model that explicitly accounts for activity scheduling and duration

Author

Listed:
  • Cantelmo, Guido
  • Viti, Francesco
  • Cipriani, Ernesto
  • Nigro, Marialisa

Abstract

This paper proposes a Dynamic Demand Estimation (DODE) framework that explicitly accounts for activity scheduling and duration. By assuming a Utility-Based departure time choice model, the time-dependent OD flow becomes a function, whose parameters are those of the utility function(s) within the departure time choice model. In this way, the DODE is solved using a parametric approach, which, on one hand, has less variables to calibrate with respect to the classical bi-level formulation while, on the other hand, it accounts for different trip purposes. Properties of the model are analytically and numerically discussed, showing that the model is more suited for estimating the systematic component of the demand with respect to the standard GLS formulation. Differently from similar approaches in literature, which rely on agent-based microsimulators and require expensive survey data, the proposed framework is applicable with all those DTA models, which are based on OD matrix, and do not necessarily need any data at user level. This has been proven by applying the proposed approach with a standard macroscopic realistic Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA).

Suggested Citation

  • Cantelmo, Guido & Viti, Francesco & Cipriani, Ernesto & Nigro, Marialisa, 2018. "A utility-based dynamic demand estimation model that explicitly accounts for activity scheduling and duration," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 303-320.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:114:y:2018:i:pb:p:303-320
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856417309643
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnott, Richard & de Palma, Andre & Lindsey, Robin, 1990. "Economics of a bottleneck," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 111-130, January.
    2. Xiao Fu & William Lam, 2014. "A network equilibrium approach for modelling activity-travel pattern scheduling problems in multi-modal transit networks with uncertainty," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 37-55, January.
    3. Simonelli, Fulvio & Marzano, Vittorio & Papola, Andrea & Vitiello, Iolanda, 2012. "A network sensor location procedure accounting for o–d matrix estimate variability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1624-1638.
    4. Rodric Frederix & Chris M.J. Tampère & Francesco Viti & Lambertus H. (Ben) Immers, 2010. "The Effects of Dynamic Network Loading Models on DTA-based OD Estimation," Chapters, in: Chris M.J. Tampere & Francesco Viti & Lambertus H. (Ben) Immers (ed.), New Developments in Transport Planning, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Hani Mahmassani & Robert Herman, 1984. "Dynamic User Equilibrium Departure Time and Route Choice on Idealized Traffic Arterials," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 362-384, November.
    6. Himpe, Willem & Corthout, Ruben & Tampère, M.J. Chris, 2016. "An efficient iterative link transmission model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PB), pages 170-190.
    7. Yang, Hai & Zhou, Jing, 1998. "Optimal traffic counting locations for origin-destination matrix estimation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 109-126, February.
    8. Ennio Cascetta, 2009. "Transportation Systems Analysis," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, number 978-0-387-75857-2, December.
    9. Gunnar Flötteröd & Yu Chen & Kai Nagel, 2012. "Behavioral Calibration and Analysis of a Large-Scale Travel Microsimulation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 481-502, December.
    10. Li, Zhi-Chun & Lam, William H.K. & Wong, S.C., 2014. "Bottleneck model revisited: An activity-based perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 262-287.
    11. Tampère, Chris M.J. & Corthout, Ruben & Cattrysse, Dirk & Immers, Lambertus H., 2011. "A generic class of first order node models for dynamic macroscopic simulation of traffic flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 289-309, January.
    12. Cascetta, Ennio, 1984. "Estimation of trip matrices from traffic counts and survey data: A generalized least squares estimator," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(4-5), pages 289-299.
    13. Zhang, Xiaoning & Yang, Hai & Huang, Hai-Jun & Zhang, H. Michael, 2005. "Integrated scheduling of daily work activities and morning-evening commutes with bottleneck congestion," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 41-60, January.
    14. Vickrey, William S, 1969. "Congestion Theory and Transport Investment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 251-260, May.
    15. Kenneth Small, 2015. "The Bottleneck Model: An Assessment and Interpretation," Working Papers 141506, University of California-Irvine, Department of Economics.
    16. Small, Kenneth A, 1982. "The Scheduling of Consumer Activities: Work Trips," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(3), pages 467-479, June.
    17. Muhammad Adnan, 2010. "Linking Macro-level Dynamic Network Loading Models with Scheduling of Individual’s Daily Activity–Travel Pattern," Chapters, in: Chris M.J. Tampere & Francesco Viti & Lambertus H. (Ben) Immers (ed.), New Developments in Transport Planning, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Maher, Michael J. & Zhang, Xiaoyan & Vliet, Dirck Van, 2001. "A bi-level programming approach for trip matrix estimation and traffic control problems with stochastic user equilibrium link flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 23-40, January.
    19. Ettema, Dick & Bastin, Fabian & Polak, John & Ashiru, Olu, 2007. "Modelling the joint choice of activity timing and duration," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 827-841, November.
    20. Yang, Hai & Iida, Yasunori & Sasaki, Tsuna, 1991. "An analysis of the reliability of an origin-destination trip matrix estimated from traffic counts," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 351-363, October.
    21. Ennio Cascetta & Domenico Inaudi & Gérald Marquis, 1993. "Dynamic Estimators of Origin-Destination Matrices Using Traffic Counts," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 363-373, November.
    22. Small, Kenneth A., 2015. "The bottleneck model: An assessment and interpretation," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 110-117.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cantelmo, Guido & Qurashi, Moeid & Prakash, A. Arun & Antoniou, Constantinos & Viti, Francesco, 2020. "Incorporating trip chaining within online demand estimation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 171-187.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cantelmo, Guido & Viti, Francesco, 2019. "Incorporating activity duration and scheduling utility into equilibrium-based Dynamic Traffic Assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 365-390.
    2. Li, Zhi-Chun & Lam, William H.K. & Wong, S.C., 2017. "Step tolling in an activity-based bottleneck model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 306-334.
    3. Pudāne, Baiba, 2019. "Departure Time Choice and Bottleneck Congestion with Automated Vehicles: Role of On-board Activities," MPRA Paper 96328, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Li, Zhi-Chun & Huang, Hai-Jun & Yang, Hai, 2020. "Fifty years of the bottleneck model: A bibliometric review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 311-342.
    5. Braid, Ralph M., 2018. "Partial peak-load pricing of a transportation bottleneck with homogeneous and heterogeneous values of time," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 29-41.
    6. Zhang, Xiang & Liu, Wei & Waller, S. Travis & Yin, Yafeng, 2019. "Modelling and managing the integrated morning-evening commuting and parking patterns under the fully autonomous vehicle environment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 380-407.
    7. Zhu, Tingting & Li, Yao & Long, Jiancheng, 2022. "Departure time choice equilibrium and tolling strategies for a bottleneck with continuous scheduling preference," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Chen, Jin-Yong & Jiang, Rui & Li, Xin-Gang & Hu, Mao-Bin & Jia, Bin & Gao, Zi-You, 2019. "Morning commute problem with queue-length-dependent bottleneck capacity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 184-215.
    9. Li, Zhi-Chun & Lam, William H.K. & Wong, S.C., 2014. "Bottleneck model revisited: An activity-based perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 262-287.
    10. Deng, Yao & Sheng, Dian & Liu, Baoli, 2021. "Managing ship lock congestion in an inland waterway: A bottleneck model with a service time window," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 142-161.
    11. John W Helsel & Venktesh Pandey & Stephen D. Boyles, 2020. "Time-Equitable Dynamic Tolling Scheme For Single Bottlenecks," Papers 2007.07091, arXiv.org.
    12. Tian, Ye & Li, Yudi & Sun, Jian, 2022. "Stick or carrot for traffic demand management? Evidence from experimental economics," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 235-254.
    13. Zhu, Zheng & Li, Xinwei & Liu, Wei & Yang, Hai, 2019. "Day-to-day evolution of departure time choice in stochastic capacity bottleneck models with bounded rationality and various information perceptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 168-192.
    14. Guo, Ren-Yong & Yang, Hai & Huang, Hai-Jun & Li, Xinwei, 2018. "Day-to-day departure time choice under bounded rationality in the bottleneck model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 832-849.
    15. Tscharaktschiew, Stefan, 2016. "The private (unnoticed) welfare cost of highway speeding behavior from time saving misperceptions," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 7, pages 24-37.
    16. Amirgholy, Mahyar & Gao, H. Oliver, 2017. "Modeling the dynamics of congestion in large urban networks using the macroscopic fundamental diagram: User equilibrium, system optimum, and pricing strategies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 215-237.
    17. van den Berg, Vincent A.C. & Verhoef, Erik T., 2016. "Autonomous cars and dynamic bottleneck congestion: The effects on capacity, value of time and preference heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 43-60.
    18. Ren-Yong Guo & Hai Yang & Hai-Jun Huang, 2018. "Are We Really Solving the Dynamic Traffic Equilibrium Problem with a Departure Time Choice?," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 603-620, June.
    19. Li, Zhi-Chun & Zhang, Liping, 2020. "The two-mode problem with bottleneck queuing and transit crowding: How should congestion be priced using tolls and fares?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 46-76.
    20. Fosgerau, Mogens & Kim, Jinwon, 2019. "Commuting and land use in a city with bottlenecks: Theory and evidence," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 182-204.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:114:y:2018:i:pb:p:303-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.