IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v88y2013icp47-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of demographic stochasticity on evolutionary dynamics and stability

Author

Listed:
  • Shpak, Max
  • Orzack, Steven Hecht
  • Barany, Ernest

Abstract

We derive the frequency-dependent selection coefficient caused by “demographic†stochasticity resulting from the random sampling of opponents an individual faces during behavioral “contests†with other individuals. The mean, variance, and higher moments of fitness all influence the direction and strength of selection. A frequency-dependent trait can be stable when an individual’s fitness depends upon an infinite number of contests with other individuals and unstable when it depends upon a finite number of contests. Conversely, unstable equilibria for an infinite number of contests can be stable when there is a finite number of contests. At stable equilibria for a finite number of contests, higher moments of fitness can outweigh the joint influence of the first two moments so that natural selection favors “within-generation†or developmental-trait variation (also known as phenotypic plasticity) contrary to the claim that natural selection always acts against such variation. We use second-moment estimates of the fitness functions in a diffusion approximation to compute fixation probabilities of competing strategies. These estimates are shown to be qualitatively consistent with those derived from simulations when population sizes are sufficiently large to ignore the contribution of higher-moment terms. We also show that explicit solutions to the diffusion approximation only exist for pair-wise interactions that lead to positive frequency-dependent selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Shpak, Max & Orzack, Steven Hecht & Barany, Ernest, 2013. "The influence of demographic stochasticity on evolutionary dynamics and stability," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 47-56.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:88:y:2013:i:c:p:47-56
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2013.06.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004058091300049X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2013.06.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christoph Hauert & Michael Doebeli, 2004. "Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6983), pages 643-646, April.
    2. Martin A. Nowak & Akira Sasaki & Christine Taylor & Drew Fudenberg, 2004. "Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6983), pages 646-650, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brian McLoone & Wai-Tong Louis Fan & Adam Pham & Rory Smead & Laurence Loewe, 2018. "Stochasticity, Selection, and the Evolution of Cooperation in a Two-Level Moran Model of the Snowdrift Game," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-14, February.
    2. Zhang, Shuai & Clark, Ruaridh & Huang, Yunke, 2020. "Frequency-dependent strategy selection in a hunting game with a finite population," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qinghu Liao & Wenwen Dong & Boxin Zhao, 2023. "A New Strategy to Solve “the Tragedy of the Commons” in Sustainable Grassland Ecological Compensation: Experience from Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Zhao, Zhengwu & Zhang, Chunyan, 2023. "The mechanisms of labor division from the perspective of task urgency and game theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 630(C).
    3. Bin Wu & Julián García & Christoph Hauert & Arne Traulsen, 2013. "Extrapolating Weak Selection in Evolutionary Games," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-7, December.
    4. Tetsushi Ohdaira, 2021. "Cooperation evolves by the payoff-difference-based probabilistic reward," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(11), pages 1-8, November.
    5. Brian McLoone & Wai-Tong Louis Fan & Adam Pham & Rory Smead & Laurence Loewe, 2018. "Stochasticity, Selection, and the Evolution of Cooperation in a Two-Level Moran Model of the Snowdrift Game," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-14, February.
    6. Hong, Lijun & Geng, Yini & Du, Chunpeng & Shen, Chen & Shi, Lei, 2021. "Average payoff-driven or imitation? A new evidence from evolutionary game theory in finite populations," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 394(C).
    7. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2017. "Publishing the donation list incompletely promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 310(C), pages 48-56.
    8. Chen, Qiao & Chen, Tong & Wang, Yongjie, 2019. "Cleverly handling the donation information can promote cooperation in public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 363-373.
    9. Egas, Martijn & Riedl, Arno, 2005. "The Economics of Altruistic Punishment and the Demise of Cooperation," IZA Discussion Papers 1646, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Li, Kun & Mao, Yizhou & Wei, Zhenlin & Cong, Rui, 2021. "Pool-rewarding in N-person snowdrift game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    11. Sergio Currarini & Carmen Marchiori & Alessandro Tavoni, 2016. "Network Economics and the Environment: Insights and Perspectives," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(1), pages 159-189, September.
    12. Sarkar, Bijan, 2021. "The cooperation–defection evolution on social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).
    13. Li, Bin-Quan & Wu, Zhi-Xi & Guan, Jian-Yue, 2022. "Critical thresholds of benefit distribution in an extended snowdrift game model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    14. Qi Su & Lei Zhou & Long Wang, 2019. "Evolutionary multiplayer games on graphs with edge diversity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Ohdaira, Tetsushi, 2024. "The universal probabilistic reward based on the difference of payoff realizes the evolution of cooperation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    16. Flávio L Pinheiro & Jorge M Pacheco & Francisco C Santos, 2012. "From Local to Global Dilemmas in Social Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-6, February.
    17. Cheng, Jiangjiang & Mei, Wenjun & Su, Wei & Chen, Ge, 2023. "Evolutionary games on networks: Phase transition, quasi-equilibrium, and mathematical principles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 611(C).
    18. Dhaker Kroumi, 2021. "Aspiration Can Promote Cooperation in Well-Mixed Populations As in Regular Graphs," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 390-417, June.
    19. Luthi, Leslie & Pestelacci, Enea & Tomassini, Marco, 2008. "Cooperation and community structure in social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(4), pages 955-966.
    20. Wes Maciejewski & Feng Fu & Christoph Hauert, 2014. "Evolutionary Game Dynamics in Populations with Heterogenous Structures," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:88:y:2013:i:c:p:47-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.