IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v132y2020icp47-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inferring trait-specific similarity among individuals from molecular markers and phenotypes with Bayesian regression

Author

Listed:
  • Gianola, Daniel
  • Fernando, Rohan L.
  • Schön, Chris-Carolin

Abstract

Modeling covariance structure based on genetic similarity between pairs of relatives plays an important role in evolutionary, quantitative and statistical genetics. Historically, genetic similarity between individuals has been quantified from pedigrees via the probability that randomly chosen homologous alleles between individuals are identical by descent (IBD). At present, however, many genetic analyses rely on molecular markers, with realized measures of genomic similarity replacing IBD-based expected similarities. Animal and plant breeders, for example, now employ marker-based genomic relationship matrices between individuals in prediction models and in estimation of genome-based heritability coefficients. Phenotypes convey information about genetic similarity as well. For instance, if phenotypic values are at least partially the result of the action of quantitative trait loci, one would expect the former to inform about the latter, as in genome-wide association studies. Statistically, a non-trivial conditional distribution of unknown genetic similarities, given phenotypes, is to be expected. A Bayesian formalism is presented here that applies to whole-genome regression methods where some genetic similarity matrix, e.g., a genomic relationship matrix, can be defined. Our Bayesian approach, based on phenotypes and markers, converts prior (markers only) expected similarity into trait-specific posterior similarity. A simulation illustrates situations under which effective Bayesian learning from phenotypes occurs. Pinus and wheat data sets were used to demonstrate applicability of the concept in practice. The methodology applies to a wide class of Bayesian linear regression models, it extends to the multiple-trait domain, and can also be used to develop phenotype-guided similarity kernels in prediction problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianola, Daniel & Fernando, Rohan L. & Schön, Chris-Carolin, 2020. "Inferring trait-specific similarity among individuals from molecular markers and phenotypes with Bayesian regression," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 47-59.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:132:y:2020:i:c:p:47-59
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2019.11.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580919301972
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2019.11.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Park, Trevor & Casella, George, 2008. "The Bayesian Lasso," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 681-686, June.
    2. Xiaochen Sun & Long Qu & Dorian J Garrick & Jack C M Dekkers & Rohan L Fernando, 2012. "A Fast EM Algorithm for BayesA-Like Prediction of Genomic Breeding Values," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-9, November.
    3. Xiaolei Liu & Meng Huang & Bin Fan & Edward S Buckler & Zhiwu Zhang, 2016. "Iterative Usage of Fixed and Random Effect Models for Powerful and Efficient Genome-Wide Association Studies," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-24, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cox Lwaka Tamba & Yuan-Li Ni & Yuan-Ming Zhang, 2017. "Iterative sure independence screening EM-Bayesian LASSO algorithm for multi-locus genome-wide association studies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Niloy Biswas & Anirban Bhattacharya & Pierre E. Jacob & James E. Johndrow, 2022. "Coupling‐based convergence assessment of some Gibbs samplers for high‐dimensional Bayesian regression with shrinkage priors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(3), pages 973-996, July.
    3. Li, Chunyu & Lou, Chenxin & Luo, Dan & Xing, Kai, 2021. "Chinese corporate distress prediction using LASSO: The role of earnings management," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Anne Musson & Damien Rousselière, 2020. "Exploring the effect of crisis on cooperatives: a Bayesian performance analysis of French craftsmen cooperatives," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(25), pages 2657-2678, May.
    5. Prüser, Jan, 2017. "Forecasting US inflation using Markov dimension switching," Ruhr Economic Papers 710, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    6. Armagan, Artin & Dunson, David, 2011. "Sparse variational analysis of linear mixed models for large data sets," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(8), pages 1056-1062, August.
    7. Wang, Hong & Forbes, Catherine S. & Fenech, Jean-Pierre & Vaz, John, 2020. "The determinants of bank loan recovery rates in good times and bad – New evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 875-897.
    8. Fan, Jianqing & Jiang, Bai & Sun, Qiang, 2022. "Bayesian factor-adjusted sparse regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 3-19.
    9. Kastner, Gregor, 2019. "Sparse Bayesian time-varying covariance estimation in many dimensions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 98-115.
    10. Justin N. Vaughn & Sandra E. Branham & Brian Abernathy & Amanda M. Hulse-Kemp & Adam R. Rivers & Amnon Levi & William P. Wechter, 2022. "Graph-based pangenomics maximizes genotyping density and reveals structural impacts on fungal resistance in melon," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Bai, Jushan & Ando, Tomohiro, 2013. "Multifactor asset pricing with a large number of observable risk factors and unobservable common and group-specific factors," MPRA Paper 52785, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2013.
    12. Martin Feldkircher & Florian Huber & Gary Koop & Michael Pfarrhofer, 2022. "APPROXIMATE BAYESIAN INFERENCE AND FORECASTING IN HUGE‐DIMENSIONAL MULTICOUNTRY VARs," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1625-1658, November.
    13. Eliaz, Kfir & Spiegler, Ran, 2022. "On incentive-compatible estimators," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 204-220.
    14. Ruixin Guo & Hongtu Zhu & Sy-Miin Chow & Joseph G. Ibrahim, 2012. "Bayesian Lasso for Semiparametric Structural Equation Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 567-577, June.
    15. Oguzhan Cepni & I. Ethem Guney & Norman R. Swanson, 2020. "Forecasting and nowcasting emerging market GDP growth rates: The role of latent global economic policy uncertainty and macroeconomic data surprise factors," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(1), pages 18-36, January.
    16. Hai Anh Tran & Hyun Jo & Thi Cuc Nguyen & Jeong-Dong Lee & Hak Soo Seo & Jong Tae Song, 2024. "Genome-Wide Association Analysis for Submergence Tolerance at the Early Vegetative and Germination Stages in Wild Soybean ( Glycine soja )," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Francesca Caselli & Matilde Faralli & Paolo Manasse & Ugo Panizza, 2021. "On the Benefits of Repaying," IMF Working Papers 2021/233, International Monetary Fund.
    18. Zhanwei Zhuang & Shaoyun Li & Rongrong Ding & Ming Yang & Enqin Zheng & Huaqiang Yang & Ting Gu & Zheng Xu & Gengyuan Cai & Zhenfang Wu & Jie Yang, 2019. "Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for loin muscle area and loin muscle depth in two Duroc pig populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, June.
    19. Mehran Aflakparast & Mathisca de Gunst & Wessel van Wieringen, 2020. "Analysis of Twitter data with the Bayesian fused graphical lasso," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, July.
    20. Hauzenberger, Niko, 2021. "Flexible Mixture Priors for Large Time-varying Parameter Models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 87-108.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:132:y:2020:i:c:p:47-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.