IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v46y2022i10s0308596122001288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why has multilateral space and spectrum resource management become more difficult?

Author

Listed:
  • Frieden, Rob

Abstract

This paper explains why the coordination of satellite orbits and spectrum use among nations may become more contentious and protracted. The potential for greater risks, delays, and conflicts may occur, despite treaty-level commitments by most nations to promote the peaceful uses of outer space and access to radio spectrum and satellite orbits free of signal interference and collision risk. Heretofore, specialized sectors of the United Nations (“UN”) have worked effectively in forging multilateral consensus on these matters.

Suggested Citation

  • Frieden, Rob, 2022. "Why has multilateral space and spectrum resource management become more difficult?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:46:y:2022:i:10:s0308596122001288
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596122001288
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stacie Hoffmann & Dominique Lazanski & Emily Taylor, 2020. "Standardising the splinternet: how China’s technical standards could fragment the internet," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 239-264, May.
    2. Codding, George A., 1991. "Evolution of the ITU," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 271-285, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schmidt, Susanne K. & Werle, Raymund, 1993. "Technical controversy in international standardization," MPIfG Discussion Paper 93/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. El-Moghazi, Mohamed & Whalley, Jason & Irvine, James, 2017. "World radiocommunication conference – 2015: Reflections on Africa international spectrum policy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 631-641.
    3. Sebastian Klotz, 2023. "Who drives the international standardisation of telecommunication and digitalisation? Introducing a new data set," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(3), pages 558-568, June.
    4. Cantero Gamito, Marta, 2023. "The influence of China in AI governance through standardisation," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    5. Pohle, Julia & Voelsen, Daniel, 2022. "Das Netz und die Netze. Vom Wandel des Internets und der globalen digitalen Ordnung [The net and the networks. Transformations of the Internet and the global digital order]," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 32(3), pages 455-487.
    6. Eckebrecht, Felicitas R., 2019. "Fueling investments - The effect of the Agreement on Basic Telecommunications," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 361-379.
    7. El-Moghazi, Mohamed & Whalley, Jason & Irvine, James, 2019. "Technology neutrality: Exploring the interaction between International Mobile Telecommunication and national spectrum management policies," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 531-548.
    8. El-Moghazi, Mohamed & Whalley, Jason & Irvine, James, 2017. "The Future of International Radio Regulations: Transformation Towards Sharing," 28th European Regional ITS Conference, Passau 2017 169457, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:46:y:2022:i:10:s0308596122001288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.