IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v39y2015i3p241-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the impact of market competition analysis process in EU׳s electronic communications sector: Catalyst or impediment towards market competition?

Author

Listed:
  • Polykalas, Spyros E.
  • Prezerakos, George N.

Abstract

It has been a few years since the European Commission introduced the Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications according to which all Member States are required to conduct market analysis in the relevant electronic communication markets and apply appropriate ex ante regulatory obligations in the case where competition was not at a satisfactory level. One of the main motivations behind the Commission׳s introduction of the Framework was the promotion of competition in electronic communications sector in regard to the welfare of EU citizens and the creation of a common market for electronic communications. Notwithstanding the fact that the telecommunications market has opened and new operators with new service offerings have emerged, a lot of criticism has been voiced regarding the Framework׳s effectiveness on several fronts (e.g. infrastructure based competition, wholesale/retail costs, uniform market structure across Europe). The paper takes another look at the implementation of the current Regulatory Framework and the ex ante remedies imposed across Member States. The implementation of the Framework is related to the evolution and competition of the fixed narrowband, fixed broadband and mobile group of markets, using indicators for an empirical discussion of the market analysis process in the EU. It uses data derived mainly from the European Commission itself and calculates indices that paint a clearer picture with respect to the evolution and competition in the above group of markets. Based on this process, the paper provides very strong indications that the current Regulatory Framework and in particular the market analysis process promotes competition both at wholesale and retail level. Finally, the paper suggests that the decision to remove market 15 from the list of markets susceptible for ex ante regulation should be revisited.

Suggested Citation

  • Polykalas, Spyros E. & Prezerakos, George N., 2015. "Measuring the impact of market competition analysis process in EU׳s electronic communications sector: Catalyst or impediment towards market competition?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 241-252.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:39:y:2015:i:3:p:241-252
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2014.08.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596114001232
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.08.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Streel, Alexandre, 2008. "Current and future European regulation of electronic communications: A critical assessment," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 722-734, December.
    2. Blankart, Charles B. & Knieps, Günter & Zenhäusern, Patrick, 2007. "Regulation of new markets in telecommunications? Market dynamics and shrinking monopolistic bottlenecks," Discussion Papers 112 [rev.], University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    3. Vladica Tintor & Milan Janković & Vlade Milićević, 2010. "The Legal And Economic Framework Of Eu Telecom Market Regulation," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 55(185), pages 107-128, April - J.
    4. Jacques PELKMANS & Andrea RENDA, 2011. "Single eComms Market? No Such Thing…," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(82), pages 21-42, 2nd quart.
    5. G. Knieps, 2005. "Telecommunications Markets in the Stranglehold of EU Regulation: On the need for a disaggregated regulatory contract," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 6(2), pages 75-94, June.
    6. Krafft, Jackie & Salies, Evens, 2008. "The diffusion of ADSL and costs of switching Internet providers in the broadband industry: Evidence from the French case," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 706-719, May.
    7. Knieps, Günter, 2005. "Telecommunications markets in the stranglehold of EU regulation: on the need for a disaggregated regulatory contract," Discussion Papers 109 [rev.], University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    8. Corrocher, Nicoletta & Zirulia, Lorenzo, 2010. "Demand and innovation in services: The case of mobile communications," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 945-955, September.
    9. Günter Knieps & Patrick Zenhäusern, 2010. "Phasing Out Sector-Specific Regulation In European Telecommunications," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 995-1006.
    10. Richards, Paul, 0. "The limitations of market-based regulation of the electronic communications sector," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3-4), pages 201-222, April.
    11. George HOUPIS & Júlia LUCENA BETRIU & Juana SANTAMARIA, 2011. "Geographic segmentation of broadband markets: appropriate differentiation or risk to a single EU market?," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(82), pages 105-126, 2nd quart.
    12. García-Muñiz, Ana Salomé & Vicente, María Rosalía, 2014. "ICT technologies in Europe: A study of technological diffusion and economic growth under network theory," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 360-370.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Knieps, Günter, 2012. "Competition and the railroads: A European perspective," Discussion Papers 142, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    2. Knieps, Günter & Zenhäusern, Patrick, 2013. "Regulatory fallacies in global telecommunications: The case of international mobile roaming," Discussion Papers 144, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    3. Knieps, Günter, 2014. "Competition and third party access in railroads," Discussion Papers 150, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    4. Knieps, Günter, 2008. "The net neutrality debate and the German communications and competition law," Discussion Papers 120, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    5. Knieps, Günter, 2013. "The evolution of the generalized differentiated services architecture and the changing role of the Internet engineering task force," Discussion Papers 147, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    6. Knieps, Günter, 2011. "Market driven network neutrality and the fallacies of Internet traffic quality regulation," Discussion Papers 136, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    7. Knieps, Günter & Zenhäusern, Patrick, 2009. "Stepping stones and access holidays: The fallacies of regulatory micro-management," Discussion Papers 123, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    8. Knieps, Günter & Zenhäusern, Patrick, 2009. "The reform of the European regulatory framework for electronic communications: The unexploited phasing-out potentials," Discussion Papers 128, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    9. Knieps, Günter, 2011. "Market driven network neutrality and the fallacies of internet traffic quality regulation," 22nd European Regional ITS Conference, Budapest 2011: Innovative ICT Applications - Emerging Regulatory, Economic and Policy Issues 52149, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    10. Knieps, Günther, 2010. "Regulatory reforms of European network industries and the courts," Discussion Papers 129 [rev.], University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    11. Knieps, Günter & Zenhäusern, Patrick, 2008. "The fallacies of network neutrality regulation," Discussion Papers 115 [rev.], University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    12. Knieps, Günter & Weiß, Hans-Jörg, 2008. "Regulatory agencies and regulatory risk," Discussion Papers 118 [rev.], University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    13. Knieps, Günter, 2010. "The three criteria test, the essential facilities doctrine and the theory of monopolistic bottlenecks," Discussion Papers 132, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    14. Knieps, Günter, 2010. "Network neutrality and the evolution of the internet," Discussion Papers 135, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    15. Karamti, Chiraz, 2019. "Lopsided effects of telecom reforms on mobile markets in the enlarged EU: Evidence from dynamic quantile model," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 238-261.
    16. Paul de Bijl, 2011. "Broadband Policy in the Light of the Dutch Experience with Telecommunications Liberalization," CPB Discussion Paper 169, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    17. Günter Knieps, 2006. "The Different Role Of Mandatory Access In German Regulation Of Railroads And Telecommunications," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 149-158.
    18. Birke, Franziska, 2007. "Universaldienstregulierung in der Telekommunikation heute: Herausforderungen, Chancen und Risiken ; ein historischer Ansatz," Discussion Papers 114, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    19. Knieps, Günter & Weiß, Hans-Jörg, 2007. "Reduction of regulatory risk: a network economic approach," Discussion Papers 117, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    20. Montenegro, Lourdes O. & Araral, Eduardo, 2020. "Can competition-enhancing regulation bridge the quality divide in Internet provision?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:39:y:2015:i:3:p:241-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.