IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v70y2022ics0160791x22001890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An entropy-based method to control COVID-19 rumors in online social networks using opinion leaders

Author

Listed:
  • Jain, Lokesh

Abstract

- In the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, people spread various COVID-19-related rumors and hoaxes that negatively influence human civilization through online social networks (OSN). The proposed research addresses the unique and innovative approach to controlling COVID-19 rumors through the power of opinion leaders (OLs) in OSN. The entire process is partitioned into two phases; the first phase describes the novel Reputation-based Opinion Leader Identification (ROLI) algorithm, including a unique voting method to identify the top-T OLs in the OSN. The second phase describes the technique to measure the aggregated polarity score of each posted tweet/post and compute each user's reputation. The empirical reputation is utilized to calculate the user's trust, the post's entropy, and its veracity. If the experimental entropy of the post is lower than the empirical threshold value, the post is likely to be categorized as a rumor. The proposed approach operated on Twitter, Instagram, and Reddit social networks for validation. The ROLI algorithm provides 91% accuracy, 93% precision, 95% recall, and 94% F1-score over other Social Network Analysis (SNA) measures to find OLs in OSN. Moreover, the proposed approach's rumor controlling effectiveness and efficiency is also estimated based on three standard metrics; affected degree, represser degree, and diffuser degree, and obtained 26%, 22%, and 23% improvement, respectively. The concluding outcomes illustrate that the influence of OLs is exceptionally significant in controlling COVID-19 rumors.

Suggested Citation

  • Jain, Lokesh, 2022. "An entropy-based method to control COVID-19 rumors in online social networks using opinion leaders," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:70:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22001890
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X22001890
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cho, Youngsang & Hwang, Junseok & Lee, Daeho, 2012. "Identification of effective opinion leaders in the diffusion of technological innovation: A social network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 97-106.
    2. Iacob Catoiu & Mihai Orzan & Octav-Ionut Macovei & Claudia Iconaru, 2014. "Modelling Users` Trust in Online Social Networks," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(35), pages 289-289, February.
    3. James Meneghello & Nik Thompson & Kevin Lee & Kok Wai Wong & Bilal Abu-Salih, 2020. "Unlocking Social Media and User Generated Content as a Data Source for Knowledge Management," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 16(1), pages 101-122, January.
    4. Cooper, Ian & Mondal, Argha & Antonopoulos, Chris G., 2020. "A SIR model assumption for the spread of COVID-19 in different communities," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    5. Zhang, Nan & Huang, Hong & Su, Boni & Zhao, Jinlong & Zhang, Bo, 2014. "Dynamic 8-state ICSAR rumor propagation model considering official rumor refutation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 415(C), pages 333-346.
    6. Johnson, Nathan & Turnbull, Benjamin & Reisslein, Martin, 2022. "Social media influence, trust, and conflict: An interview based study of leadership perceptions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Mohammed, Abdulalem & Ferraris, Alberto, 2021. "Factors influencing user participation in social media: Evidence from twitter usage during COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Dong, Xuefan & Lian, Ying, 2021. "A review of social media-based public opinion analyses: Challenges and recommendations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Yi Zhang & Jiuping Xu, 2015. "A Rumor Spreading Model considering the Cumulative Effects of Memory," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-11, January.
    10. Jia, Pingqi & Wang, Chao & Zhang, Gaoyu & Ma, Jianfeng, 2019. "A rumor spreading model based on two propagation channels in social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 524(C), pages 342-353.
    11. Amirhosein Bodaghi & Sama Goliaei, 2018. "A Novel Model For Rumor Spreading On Social Networks With Considering The Influence Of Dissenting Opinions," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(06n07), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Xing, Yunfei & Wang, Xiwei & Qiu, Chengcheng & Li, Yueqi & He, Wu, 2022. "Research on opinion polarization by big data analytics capabilities in online social networks," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Tom Britton, 2020. "Epidemic models on social networks—With inference," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 222-241, August.
    14. Siyam, Nur & Alqaryouti, Omar & Abdallah, Sherief, 2020. "Mining government tweets to identify and predict citizens engagement," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    15. Hu, Yuhan & Pan, Qiuhui & Hou, Wenbing & He, Mingfeng, 2018. "Rumor spreading model with the different attitudes towards rumors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 502(C), pages 331-344.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camilleri, Mark Anthony & Kozak, Metin, 2022. "Interactive engagement through travel and tourism social media groups: A social facilitation theory perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Polyzos, Efstathios & Fotiadis, Anestis & Huan, Tzung-Cheng, 2023. "From Heroes to Scoundrels: Exploring the effects of online campaigns celebrating frontline workers on COVID-19 outcomes," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Lu, Peng, 2019. "Heterogeneity, judgment, and social trust of agents in rumor spreading," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 350(C), pages 447-461.
    4. Nwaibeh, E.A. & Chikwendu, C.R., 2023. "A deterministic model of the spread of scam rumor and its numerical simulations," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 111-129.
    5. Shuzhen Yu & Zhiyong Yu & Haijun Jiang, 2022. "Stability, Hopf Bifurcation and Optimal Control of Multilingual Rumor-Spreading Model with Isolation Mechanism," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-29, December.
    6. Lu, Peng & Deng, Liping & Liao, Hongbing, 2019. "Conditional effects of individual judgment heterogeneity in information dissemination," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 335-344.
    7. Javier Cifuentes-Faura & Ursula Faura-Martínez & Matilde Lafuente-Lechuga, 2022. "Mathematical Modeling and the Use of Network Models as Epidemiological Tools," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Li, Ming & Zhang, Hong & Georgescu, Paul & Li, Tan, 2021. "The stochastic evolution of a rumor spreading model with two distinct spread inhibiting and attitude adjusting mechanisms in a homogeneous social network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 562(C).
    9. Yao Hongxing & Zou Yushi, 2019. "Research on Rumor Spreading Model with Time Delay and Control Effect," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 7(4), pages 373-389, August.
    10. Zhu, Linhe & Zheng, Wenxin & Shen, Shuling, 2023. "Dynamical analysis of a SI epidemic-like propagation model with non-smooth control," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    11. Alsaad, Abdallah & Alam, Md. Moddassir & Lutfi, Abdalwali, 2023. "A sensemaking perspective on the association between social media engagement and pro-environment behavioural intention," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    12. Liang’an Huo & Yuqing Zhang, 2022. "Effect of Global and Local Refutation Mechanism on Rumor Propagation in Heterogeneous Network," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Xia, Yang & Jiang, Haijun & Yu, Zhiyong, 2022. "Global dynamics of ILSR rumor spreading model with general nonlinear spreading rate in multi-lingual environment," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    14. Lu, Peng & Yao, Qi & Lu, Pengfei, 2019. "Two-stage predictions of evolutionary dynamics during the rumor dissemination," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 517(C), pages 349-369.
    15. Lian, Ying & Tang, Huiting & Xiang, Mengting & Dong, Xuefan, 2024. "Public attitudes and sentiments toward ChatGPT in China: A text mining analysis based on social media," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    16. Li, Dandan & Ma, Jing, 2017. "How the government’s punishment and individual’s sensitivity affect the rumor spreading in online social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 469(C), pages 284-292.
    17. Onete Cristian Bogdan & Chita Sandra Diana & Vargas Vanesa Madalina, 2020. "The impact of fake news on the real estate market," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 316-323, July.
    18. Cano-Marin, Enrique & Mora-Cantallops, Marçal & Sánchez-Alonso, Salvador, 2023. "Twitter as a predictive system: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    19. Khan, Nawab Ali & Azhar, Mohd & Rahman, Mohd Nayyer & Akhtar, Mohd Junaid, 2022. "Scale development and validation for usage of social networking sites during COVID-19," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    20. Cheng, Yingying & Huo, Liang’an & Zhao, Laijun, 2020. "Rumor spreading in complex networks under stochastic node activity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 559(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:70:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22001890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.