IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v62y2020ics0160791x19301794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“These devices have not been made for older people's needs” – Older adults' perceptions of digital technologies in Finland and Ireland

Author

Listed:
  • Pirhonen, Jari
  • Lolich, Luciana
  • Tuominen, Katariina
  • Jolanki, Outi
  • Timonen, Virpi

Abstract

This article examines how older adults use and perceive digital technologies in Finland and Ireland. These two countries are at different stages regarding two important global trends – demographic ageing and digitalization. Finland, being the fastest ageing society in Europe, is also one of the leaders in implementing digital technologies in social and health care services. In contrast, Ireland is a demographically younger and less digitalized society. Drawing on focus group discussions on the usage of digital technologies, conducted with older adults in both countries, we analyse how digital technologies are adopted and viewed by older generations. The analyses showed that older adults associate digitalization with both advantages and drawbacks. To encapsulate these two contrasting aspects, we developed the term Janus-faced conceptions of technology. This concept encapsulates how the successful adoption of digital technology facilitates everyday activities whereas the inability to utilise technologies results in feelings of alienation and being out-of-touch. The digital divide was found to occur not only between generations but also between different socioeconomic groups of older adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Pirhonen, Jari & Lolich, Luciana & Tuominen, Katariina & Jolanki, Outi & Timonen, Virpi, 2020. "“These devices have not been made for older people's needs” – Older adults' perceptions of digital technologies in Finland and Ireland," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:62:y:2020:i:c:s0160791x19301794
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X19301794
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101287?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lolich, Luciana & Riccò, Isabella & Deusdad, Blanca & Timonen, Virpi, 2019. "Embracing technology? Health and Social Care professionals' attitudes to the deployment of e-Health initiatives in elder care services in Catalonia and Ireland," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 63-71.
    2. Wendy Currie & Jonathan J.M. Seddon, 2014. "A cross-national analysis of eHealth in the European Union: Some policy and research directions," Post-Print hal-01069994, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Miyea & Oh, Joohyun & Kim, Beomsoo, 2021. "Experience of digital music services and digital self-efficacy among older adults: Enjoyment and anxiety as mediators," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Lopez-Sintas, Jordi & Lamberti, Giuseppe & Sukphan, Jakkapong, 2020. "The social structuring of the digital gap in a developing country. The impact of computer and internet access opportunities on internet use in Thailand," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Thi Xuan Hoa Nguyen & Thi Bich Ngoc Tran & Thanh Binh Dao & Galina Barysheva & Chien Thang Nguyen & An Ha Nguyen & Tran Si Lam, 2022. "Elderly People’s Adaptation to the Evolving Digital Society: A Case Study in Vietnam," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Hayat, Naeem & Salameh, Anas A. & Malik, Haider Ali & Yaacob, Mohd Rafi, 2022. "Exploring the adoption of wearable healthcare devices among the Pakistani adults with dual analysis techniques," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Kim, Chelsea & Feng, Bo, 2021. "Digital inequality in online reciprocity between generations: A preliminary exploration of ability to use communication technology as a mediator," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Safarov, Nuriiar, 2021. "Personal experiences of digital public services access and use: Older migrants’ digital choices," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Balakrishnan, Vimala & Shuib, Nor Liyana Mohd, 2021. "Drivers and inhibitors for digital payment adoption using the Cashless Society Readiness-Adoption model in Malaysia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. Taipale, Sakari & Oinas, Tomi & Karhinen, Joonas, 2021. "Heterogeneity of traditional and digital media use among older adults: A six-country comparison," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikayin, Fatemeh & Heikkilä, Marikka & de Reuver, Mark & Solaimani, Sam, 2014. "Workplace primary prevention programmes enabled by information and communication technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 326-332.
    2. Ben-Assuli, Ofir, 2015. "Electronic health records, adoption, quality of care, legal and privacy issues and their implementation in emergency departments," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 287-297.
    3. Frishammar, Johan & Essén, Anna & Bergström, Frida & Ekman, Tilda, 2023. "Digital health platforms for the elderly? Key adoption and usage barriers and ways to address them," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Na, Eunkyung & Jung, Yoonhyuk & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "How do care service managers and workers perceive care robot adoption in elderly care facilities?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Shao, Qinglong & Kostka, Genia, 2023. "The COVID-19 pandemic and deepening digital inequalities in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    6. Lu, Liyan & Liang, Changyong & Gu, Dongxiao & Ma, Yiming & Xie, Yuguang & Zhao, Shuping, 2021. "What advantages of blockchain affect its adoption in the elderly care industry? A study based on the technology–organisation–environment framework," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2019. "Evaluation and selection of mobile health (mHealth) applications using AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Alan Serrano & Javier Garcia-Guzman & Georgios Xydopoulos & Ali Tarhini, 2020. "Analysis of Barriers to the Deployment of Health Information Systems: a Stakeholder Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 455-474, April.
    9. Chauhan, Ankur & Jakhar, Suresh Kumar & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta, 2022. "Implications for sustainable healthcare operations in embracing telemedicine services during a pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    10. Nadine Ostern & Guido Perscheid & Caroline Reelitz & Jürgen Moormann, 2021. "Keeping pace with the healthcare transformation: a literature review and research agenda for a new decade of health information systems research," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(4), pages 901-921, December.
    11. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Fogliatto, Flávio Sanson & Espôsto, Kleber Francisco & Vergara, Alejandro Mac Cawley & Vassolo, Roberto & Mendoza, Diego Tlapa & Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan, 2020. "Effects of contingencies on healthcare 4.0 technologies adoption and barriers in emerging economies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. Chun-Hsun Chen & Yu-Li Lan & Wei-Pang Yang & Fang-Ming Hsu & Chin-Lon Lin & Hsing-Chu Chen, 2019. "Exploring the Impact of a Telehealth Care System on Organizational Capabilities and Organizational Performance from a Resource-Based Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-14, October.
    13. Lolich, Luciana & Riccò, Isabella & Deusdad, Blanca & Timonen, Virpi, 2019. "Embracing technology? Health and Social Care professionals' attitudes to the deployment of e-Health initiatives in elder care services in Catalonia and Ireland," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 63-71.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:62:y:2020:i:c:s0160791x19301794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.