IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v57y2019icp104-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A feedback mechanism for appropriate technology development and dissemination: Case study approach

Author

Listed:
  • Bhattacharjya, Bibhuti Ranjan
  • Kakoty, Sashindra Kumar
  • Singha, Siddhartha

Abstract

The delivery of appropriate technology to rural communities poses multi-dimensional challenges, such as the lack of acceptance, complexities in implementation, and sustainability. The solution to this problem requires a structured approach and institutionalised intervention. In recent years, the top-down approach of rural development practiced creation/enablement of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises through technological interventions. But there has been no technology transfer framework available for rural organisations, especially in the context of developing nations. Thus, the aim of this article is to propose a holistic technology transfer mechanism with necessary understanding of the problems and mitigation of relevant hurdles. A case of a collaborative technology development mechanism called the Rural Technology Action Group (RuTAG), has been discussed using a qualitative case study approach. This new rural technology transfer mechanism was found to be effective for upgrading traditional tools/technologies in practice among rural artisans, weavers, and farmers. To showcase the participatory technology development and dissemination strategy, a case of redesigning a Pirn winding machine is presented. The new Pirn winding machine can produce 12 Pirns at a time instead of 1 Pirn, as in the traditional process. This paper highlights some of the key aspects of technology development, assessment, transfer, and hand-holding, which is befitting for resource-constrained areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhattacharjya, Bibhuti Ranjan & Kakoty, Sashindra Kumar & Singha, Siddhartha, 2019. "A feedback mechanism for appropriate technology development and dissemination: Case study approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 104-114.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:57:y:2019:i:c:p:104-114
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.12.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X17301276
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.12.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulsrud, Kirsten & Rohracher, Harald & Muchunku, Charles, 2018. "Spatial transfer of innovations: South-South learning on village-scale solar power supply between India and Kenya," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 89-97.
    2. Pansera, Mario & Owen, Richard, 2018. "Framing inclusive innovation within the discourse of development: Insights from case studies in India," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 23-34.
    3. Baraki, Yemane A. & Brent, Alan C., 2013. "Technology transfer of hand pumps in rural communities of Swaziland: Towards sustainable project life cycle management," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 258-266.
    4. Ravindra Tripathi & Rajesh Kumar Shastri & Sweta Agarwal, 2013. "Survival and Growth Strategies for Small- and Medium-Scale Enterprises in India: A Key for Sustainable Development," Springer Books, in: Chiranjit Mukhopadhyay & K B Akhilesh & R. Srinivasan & Anjula Gurtoo & Parthasarathy Ramachandran & (ed.), Driving the Economy through Innovation and Entrepreneurship, edition 127, pages 163-174, Springer.
    5. Mario Pansera & Soumodip Sarkar, 2016. "Crafting Sustainable Development Solutions: Frugal Innovations of Grassroots Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Rao, C.N.R., 2008. "Science and technology policies: The case of India," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 242-247.
    7. Truffer, Bernhard & Schippl, Jens & Fleischer, Torsten, 2017. "Decentering technology in technology assessment: prospects for socio-technical transitions in electric mobility in Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 34-48.
    8. Mashelkar, R.A., 2008. "Indian science, technology, and society: The changing landscape," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 299-308.
    9. Hazarika, Bhabesh & Bezbaruah, Madhurjya Prashad & Goswami, Kishor, 2016. "Adoption of modern weaving technology in the handloom micro-enterprises in Assam: A Double Hurdle approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 344-356.
    10. Pachouri, Anshul & Sharma, Sankalp, 2016. "Barriers to Innovation in Indian Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," ADBI Working Papers 588, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    11. Bloem da Silveira Junior, Luiz A. & Vasconcellos, Eduardo & Vasconcellos Guedes, Liliana & Guedes, Luis Fernando A. & Costa, Renato Machado, 2018. "Technology roadmapping: A methodological proposition to refine Delphi results," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 194-206.
    12. Kathryn Cormican & Michael O'Connor, 2009. "Technology Transfer For Product Life Cycle Extension: A Model For Successful Implementation," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 265-282.
    13. Forsman, Helena, 2011. "Innovation capacity and innovation development in small enterprises. A comparison between the manufacturing and service sectors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 739-750, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geurts, Amber & Geerdink, Tara & Sprenkeling, Marit, 2022. "Accelerated innovation in crises: The role of collaboration in the development of alternative ventilators during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Laura Del-Río-Carazo & Emiliano Acquila-Natale & Santiago Iglesias-Pradas & Ángel Hernández-García, 2022. "Sustainable Rural Electrification Project Management: An Analysis of Three Case Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Johnson, Donavon, 2024. "Food security, the agriculture value chain, and digital transformation: The case of Jamaica's agricultural business information system (ABIS)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Ashraf, Shah Nawaz & Singh, Ajay K, 2022. "Implications of appropriate technology and farm inputs in the agricultural sector of Gujarat: empirical analysis based on primary data," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 35(2), December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mortazavi, Sina & Eslami, Mohammad H. & Hajikhani, Arash & Väätänen, Juha, 2021. "Mapping inclusive innovation: A bibliometric study and literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 736-750.
    2. Lakitan, Benyamin, 2013. "Connecting all the dots: Identifying the “actor level” challenges in establishing effective innovation system in Indonesia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 41-54.
    3. Mónica Ramos-Mejía & Alejandro Balanzo, 2018. "What It Takes to Lead Sustainability Transitions from the Bottom-Up: Strategic Interactions of Grassroots Ecopreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Shampa Paul & Kaushalesh Lal, 2021. "Technology Intensity and Employment in the Indian Economy," Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, , vol. 20(1), pages 34-52, June.
    5. Felix Ouko Opola & Laurens Klerkx & Cees Leeuwis & Catherine Kilelu, 0. "The Hybridity of Inclusive Innovation Narratives Between Theory and Practice: A Framing Analysis," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    6. Felix Ouko Opola & Laurens Klerkx & Cees Leeuwis & Catherine Kilelu, 2021. "The Hybridity of Inclusive Innovation Narratives Between Theory and Practice: A Framing Analysis," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(3), pages 626-648, June.
    7. Maciej Zastempowski & Waldemar Glabiszewski & Krzysztof Krukowski & Szymon Cyfert, 2020. "Technological Innovation Capabilities of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 460-474.
    8. Mei, Maggie Qiuzhu & Wang, Le & Yan, Jie, 2023. "Maintaining product quality consistency when offshoring to emerging markets: The role of subsidiary control," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1).
    9. Dimitrios Kafetzopoulos & Evangelos Psomas, 2016. "ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING, NON-TECHNICAL INNOVATION AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-28, April.
    10. Meng, Zhiyi & Li, Eldon Y. & Qiu, Rui, 2020. "Environmental sustainability with free-floating carsharing services: An on-demand refueling recommendation system for Car2go in Seattle," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    11. Marcela Marçal Alves Pinto & João Luiz Kovaleski & Rui Tadashi Yoshino & Regina Negri Pagani, 2019. "Knowledge and Technology Transfer Influencing the Process of Innovation in Green Supply Chain Management: A Multicriteria Model Based on the DEMATEL Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-33, June.
    12. Rafael Cáceres & Joaquin Guzmán, 2015. "Seeking an innovation structure common to both manufacturing and services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 9(3), pages 361-379, September.
    13. Helka Kalliomäki & Johanna Kalliokoski & Thomas Woodson & Leena Kunttu & Jari Kuusisto, 2024. "Inclusion as a science, technology, and innovation policy objective in high-income countries: the decoupling dilemma," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(5), pages 795-807.
    14. Bhattacharjya, Bibhuti Ranjan & Bhaduri, Saradindu & Kakoty, Sashindra Kumar, 2023. "Co-creating community-led frugal innovation: An adapted Quadruple Helix?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    15. Ju Han Yeon & Seung-hwan Jang, 2023. "The Relation between Bio-Industry Performance and Innovation Capacity—Focusing on the Korean Bio-Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Kouam, Jean & Asongu, Simplice, 2022. "Effects of Taxation on Social Innovation and Implications for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Developing Countries: A Literature Review," MPRA Paper 114061, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Snow, Stephen & Fielke, Simon & Fleming, Aysha & Jakku, Emma & Malakar, Yuwan & Turner, Charles & Hunter, Tammy & Tijs, Sigrid & Bonnett, Graham, 2024. "Climate services for agriculture: Steering towards inclusive innovation in Australian climate services design and delivery," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    18. Xianhai Huang & Hangyu Chen & Gaoju Yang, 2017. "Do Rising Labour Costs Drive Innovation in Enterprises? Propensity Score Matching Evidence from Chinese Firms," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 23-42, February.
    19. Joana Costa & Inês Amorim & João Reis & Nuno Melão, 2023. "User communities: from nice-to-have to must-have," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-35, December.
    20. Bipashyee Ghosh & Saurabh Arora, 2022. "Smart as (un)democratic? The making of a smart city imaginary in Kolkata, India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 318-339, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:57:y:2019:i:c:p:104-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.