IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v51y2017icp189-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kill switches, remote deletion, and intelligent agents: Framing everyday household cybersecurity in the internet of things

Author

Listed:
  • Oravec, Jo Ann

Abstract

Increasing utilizations of kill switches, remote deletion, and intelligent agents as a part of “Internet of Things” (IoT) architectures present emerging cybersecurity and privacy challenges. These issues are compounded in complexity by the frequent updates and other controls instituted by the growing assortment of purveyors of household IoT devices and systems. This paper proposes that aspects of user ownership, awareness, and voice be clarified and in some venues fostered in part to expose as quickly as possible potential technological and social dangers. It addresses rights of household participants to obtain knowledge and control over the intelligent IoT agents operating (and perhaps “quartering”) in their personal and intimate spheres, as well as to be free from inappropriately opportunistic applications associated with IoT systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Oravec, Jo Ann, 2017. "Kill switches, remote deletion, and intelligent agents: Framing everyday household cybersecurity in the internet of things," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 189-198.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:51:y:2017:i:c:p:189-198
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.09.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X17300921
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.09.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew N. Liaropoulos, 2016. "Reconceptualising Cyber Security: Safeguarding Human Rights in the Era of Cyber Surveillance," International Journal of Cyber Warfare and Terrorism (IJCWT), IGI Global, vol. 6(2), pages 32-40, April.
    2. Mark Camillo, 2017. "Cyber risk and the changing role of insurance," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 53-63, January.
    3. Lee, In & Lee, Kyoochun, 2015. "The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 431-440.
    4. Weinberg, Bruce D. & Milne, George R. & Andonova, Yana G. & Hajjat, Fatima M., 2015. "Internet of Things: Convenience vs. privacy and secrecy," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(6), pages 615-624.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oravec, Jo Ann, 2023. "Rage against robots: Emotional and motivational dimensions of anti-robot attacks, robot sabotage, and robot bullying," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Cheryl, Barr-Kumarakulasinghe & Ng, Boon-Kwee & Wong, Chan-Yuan, 2021. "Governing the progress of internet-of-things: Ambivalence in the quest of technology exploitation and user rights protection," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Aggarwal, Nitin & Albert, Leslie J. & Hill, Timothy R. & Rodan, Simon A., 2020. "Risk knowledge and concern as influences of purchase intention for internet of things devices," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    4. Pal, Debajyoti & Zhang, Xiangmin & Siyal, Saeed, 2021. "Prohibitive factors to the acceptance of Internet of Things (IoT) technology in society: A smart-home context using a resistive modelling approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Yang & Papagiannidis, Savvas & Alamanos, Eleftherios, 2018. "Internet of Things: A systematic review of the business literature from the user and organisational perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 285-297.
    2. Saarikko, Ted & Westergren, Ulrika H. & Blomquist, Tomas, 2020. "Digital transformation: Five recommendations for the digitally conscious firm," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 825-839.
    3. Saarikko, Ted & Westergren, Ulrika H. & Blomquist, Tomas, 2017. "The Internet of Things: Are you ready for what’s coming?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 667-676.
    4. Mohammadzadeh, Ali Kamali & Ghafoori, Saeed & Mohammadian, Ayoub & Mohammadkazemi, Reza & Mahbanooei, Bahareh & Ghasemi, Rohollah, 2018. "A Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (FANP) approach for prioritizing internet of things challenges in Iran," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 124-134.
    5. Krotov, Vlad, 2017. "The Internet of Things and new business opportunities," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 831-841.
    6. Le Hoang Son & Sudan Jha & Raghvendra Kumar & Jyotir Moy Chatterjee & Manju Khari, 2019. "Collaborative handshaking approaches between internet of computing and internet of things towards a smart world: a review from 2009–2017," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 617-634, April.
    7. Sittiporn Pimsakul & Premaratne Samaranayake & Tritos Laosirihongthong, 2021. "Prioritizing Enabling Factors of IoT Adoption for Sustainability in Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Huo, Dongyang & Malik, Asad Waqar & Ravana, Sri Devi & Rahman, Anis Ur & Ahmedy, Ismail, 2024. "Mapping smart farming: Addressing agricultural challenges in data-driven era," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    9. Leonel Jorge Ribeiro Nunes & Radu Godina & João Carlos de Oliveira Matias, 2019. "Technological Innovation in Biomass Energy for the Sustainable Growth of Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, January.
    10. Natalia Kharadze & Paichadze Nugzar & Nino Paresashvili & Dea Pirtskhalaishvili, 2021. "General Trends of Business Career Management," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 8, January -.
    11. Athanasios Tsipis & Asterios Papamichail & Ioannis Angelis & George Koufoudakis & Georgios Tsoumanis & Konstantinos Oikonomou, 2020. "An Alertness-Adjustable Cloud/Fog IoT Solution for Timely Environmental Monitoring Based on Wildfire Risk Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-35, July.
    12. Matteo Malavasi & Gareth W. Peters & Pavel V. Shevchenko & Stefan Truck & Jiwook Jang & Georgy Sofronov, 2021. "Cyber Risk Frequency, Severity and Insurance Viability," Papers 2111.03366, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    13. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier & Jong Seok Lee & Mark Keil & Daniel Lunn & Dirk W. Bester, 2022. "The Empirical Reality of IT Project Cost Overruns: Discovering A Power-Law Distribution," Papers 2210.01573, arXiv.org.
    14. Chae, Bongsug (Kevin), 2018. "The Internet of Things (IoT): A Survey of Topics and Trends using Twitter Data and Topic Modeling," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190376, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    15. Bettina Freitag & Lukas Häfner & Verena Pfeuffer & Jochen Übelhör, 2020. "Evaluating investments in flexible on-demand production capacity: a real options approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 133-161, April.
    16. Akhtar, Pervaiz & Khan, Zaheer & Tarba, Shlomo & Jayawickrama, Uchitha, 2018. "The Internet of Things, dynamic data and information processing capabilities, and operational agility," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 307-316.
    17. Li, Ying & Dai, Jing & Cui, Li, 2020. "The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    18. Xiaoying Xie & Charles Lee & Martin Eling, 2020. "Cyber insurance offering and performance: an analysis of the U.S. cyber insurance market," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 45(4), pages 690-736, October.
    19. Osterrieder, Philipp & Budde, Lukas & Friedli, Thomas, 2020. "The smart factory as a key construct of industry 4.0: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    20. Deng, Ying & Cao, Zhitao & Yang, Na, 2024. "Understanding the nexus between fintech, natural resources, green investment, and environmental sustainability in China: A DYNARDL approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:51:y:2017:i:c:p:189-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.