IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v36y2014icp1-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological and architectural solutions for Dutch nursing homes: Results of a multidisciplinary mind mapping session with professional stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • van Hoof, J.
  • Wetzels, M.H.
  • Dooremalen, A.M.C.
  • Wouters, E.J.M.
  • Nieboer, M.E.
  • Sponselee, A.A.M.
  • Eyck, A.M.E.
  • van Gorkom, P.J.L.M.
  • Zwerts-Verhelst, E.L.M.
  • Peek, S.T.M.
  • Vissers-Luijcks, C.
  • van der Voort, C.S.
  • Moonen, M.J.G.A.
  • van de Vrande, H.A.
  • van Dijck-Heinen, C.J.M.L.
  • Raijmakers, T.E.
  • Oude Weernink, C.E.
  • Paricharak, N.
  • Hoedemakers, C.G.J.J.
  • Woudstra, J.M.M.
  • van der Voort, L.
  • van de Werff, T.C.F.
  • van der Putten, B.
  • Overdiep, R.A.

Abstract

There is an increasing call in society for the improvement of well-being for nursing home residents and the support of care professionals through a wide array of architectural and technological solutions that are available in modern nursing homes. This study investigated which of these solutions are considered essential by stakeholders from healthcare and technology. Data were gathered via 22 simultaneously held multidisciplinary mind map sessions with 97 stakeholders, resulting in 43 mind maps. These, in turn, were grouped into a single mind map of the nursing home in general, the private rooms for residents with somatic or psychogeriatric health problems, and the group living room. A prioritization of solutions was added. The contents of the mind maps reflect a Dutch consensus on the necessary architectural and technological features for the design of nursing homes.

Suggested Citation

  • van Hoof, J. & Wetzels, M.H. & Dooremalen, A.M.C. & Wouters, E.J.M. & Nieboer, M.E. & Sponselee, A.A.M. & Eyck, A.M.E. & van Gorkom, P.J.L.M. & Zwerts-Verhelst, E.L.M. & Peek, S.T.M. & Vissers-Luijcks, 2014. "Technological and architectural solutions for Dutch nursing homes: Results of a multidisciplinary mind mapping session with professional stakeholders," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-12.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:36:y:2014:i:c:p:1-12
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.12.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X13000869
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.12.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Crowe & Lorraine Sheppard, 2012. "Mind mapping research methods," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1493-1504, August.
    2. Reed, Jan & Roskell Payton, Valerie & Bond, Senga, 1998. "The importance of place for older people moving into care homes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 859-867, April.
    3. van Hoof, Joost & Verkerk, Maarten J., 2013. "Developing an integrated design model incorporating technology philosophy for the design of healthcare environments: A case analysis of facilities for psychogeriatric and psychiatric care in The Nethe," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. van Wezel, C. & Zwerts-Verhelst, E.L.M. & Sturm, J. & van Hoof, J., 2016. "An explorative study of the beliefs of staff of psychogeriatric nursing homes regarding the use of dynamic lighting systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 60-65.
    2. Toms, G. & Verity, F. & Orrell, A., 2019. "Social care technologies for older people: Evidence for instigating a broader and more inclusive dialogue," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fiona Ecarnot & Stéphane Sanchez & Gilles Berrut & Véronique Suissa & Serge Guérin & Aude Letty, 2022. "Defining Your “Life Territory”: The Meaning of Place and Home for Community Dwellers and Nursing Home Residents—A Qualitative Study in Four European Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-10, January.
    2. Joost van Hoof & Hannah R. Marston, 2021. "Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Sukkird, Vatcharapong & Shirahada, Kunio, 2015. "Technology challenges to healthcare service innovation in aging Asia: Case of value co-creation in emergency medical support system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 122-128.
    4. Jacques Toit & Mark Napier & Lochner Marais & Jan Cloete & Beth Crankshaw, 2022. "A typology of designs for housing research: improving methodological coherence of paradigm, approach and design," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 3875-3891, December.
    5. Chakraborty, Samyadip & Bhatt, Vaidik & Chakravorty, Tulika & Chakraborty, Kaustov, 2021. "Analysis of digital technologies as antecedent to care service transparency and orchestration," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    6. Cheng, Yang & Rosenberg, Mark W. & Wang, Wuyi & Yang, Linsheng & Li, Hairong, 2011. "Aging, health and place in residential care facilities in Beijing, China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 365-372, February.
    7. Hannah R. Marston & Joost van Hoof, 2019. "“Who Doesn’t Think about Technology When Designing Urban Environments for Older People?” A Case Study Approach to a Proposed Extension of the WHO’s Age-Friendly Cities Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-35, September.
    8. Yenan Dong & Shangshang Zhu & Wenjie Li, 2021. "Promoting Sustainable Creativity: An Empirical Study on the Application of Mind Mapping Tools in Graphic Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Loredana Ivan & Dorin Beu & Joost van Hoof, 2020. "Smart and Age-Friendly Cities in Romania: An Overview of Public Policy and Practice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-25, July.
    10. Joost van Hoof & Deirdre M. Beneken genaamd Kolmer & Erwin de Vlugt & Sanne I. de Vries, 2019. "Quality of Life: The Interplay between Human Behaviour, Technology and the Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-7, December.
    11. Yip, Man Hang & Phaal, Robert & Probert, David R., 2015. "Characterising product-service systems in the healthcare industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 129-143.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:36:y:2014:i:c:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.