IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v33y2011i1p109-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Federal support for science and technology, or hidden industrial policy?

Author

Listed:
  • Motoyama, Yasuyuki
  • Appelbaum, Richard
  • Parker, Rachel

Abstract

The case of the National Nanotechnology Initiative highlights elements of industrial policy carried out by the U.S. government not only by setting rules and providing infrastructure, but also by strategically selecting technology of the next generation and arranging large-scale public investment. The federal government justified the Initiative by calling for the scientific need for industrial competitiveness, an explicit integration of science and technology policy and industrial policy. Moreover, we find evidence that this program, now funding almost $1.8 billion and extending to thirteen federal agencies, was initiated and drafted by a small handful number of policy makers in Washington. At the same time, despite its intention to strengthen the industrial competitiveness, the bulk of the federal government fund continues to channel into universities and government labs and little into the private sector. Whether this goal will be achieved without more direct government focus on commercialization remains uncertain.

Suggested Citation

  • Motoyama, Yasuyuki & Appelbaum, Richard & Parker, Rachel, 2011. "The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Federal support for science and technology, or hidden industrial policy?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 109-118.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:33:y:2011:i:1:p:109-118
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.03.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X1100011X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.03.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chong Ju Choi & Carla C. J. M. Millar & Caroline Y. L. Wong, 2005. "Knowledge and Cities," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Knowledge Entanglements, chapter 0, pages 39-51, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Richard P Appelbaum & Rachel A Parker, 2008. "China's bid to become a global nanotech leader: Advancing nanotechnology through state-led programs and international collaborations," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(5), pages 319-334, June.
    3. Lane, Neal, 2008. "US science and technology: An uncoordinated system that seems to work," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 248-263.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dosi, Giovanni & Lamperti, Francesco & Mazzucato, Mariana & Napoletano, Mauro & Roventini, Andrea, 2023. "Mission-oriented policies and the “Entrepreneurial State” at work: An agent-based exploration," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Wolf-Hendrik Uhlbach & Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Thomas Scherngell, 2017. "R&D Policy and Technological Trajectories of Regions: Evidence from the EU Framework Programmes," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1722, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2017.
    3. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/401t6job098n79ch91o9giov9d is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Filippo Belloc, 2014. "Innovation in State-Owned Enterprises: Reconsidering the Conventional Wisdom," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 821-848.
    5. Richard P. Appelbaum & Rachel Parker, 2012. "China’s Move to High-tech Innovation: Some Regional Policy Implications," Chapters, in: Christopher M. Dent & Jörn Dosch (ed.), The Asia-Pacific, Regionalism and the Global System, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Mariana Mazzucato, 2015. "From Market Fixing to Market-Creating: A New Framework for Economic Policy," SPRU Working Paper Series 2015-25, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    7. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/401t6job098n79ch91o9giov9d is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Mariana Mazzucato & Gregor Semieniuk, 2017. "Public financing of innovation: new questions," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(1), pages 24-48.
    9. Kang, Inje & Yang, Jiseong & Lee, Wonjae & Seo, Eun-Yeong & Lee, Duk Hee, 2023. "Delineating development trends of nanotechnology in the semiconductor industry: Focusing on the relationship between science and technology by employing structural topic model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominic Regan & Gene Tunny, 2008. "Venture capital in Australia," Economic Roundup, The Treasury, Australian Government, issue 1, pages 1-13, March.
    2. David Rigby, 2012. "The Geography of Knowledge Relatedness and Technological Diversification in U.S. Cities," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1218, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2012.
    3. Ana María Fernández-Maldonado & Arie Romein, 2012. "The Sustainability of Knowledge-related Policies in Technology-based Cities in the Netherlands," Chapters, in: Marina van Geenhuizen & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), Creative Knowledge Cities, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Pierre-Alexandre Balland & David Rigby & Ron Boschma, 2015. "The technological resilience of US cities," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(2), pages 167-184.
    5. Ron Boschma & Carlo Gianelle, 2014. "Regional Branching and Smart Specialisation Policy," JRC Research Reports JRC88242, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Clara Turner & Marco R Di Tommaso & Chiara Pollio & Karen Chapple, 2020. "Who will win the electric vehicle race? The role of place-based assets and policy," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(4), pages 337-362, June.
    7. Patrick S Vitale, 2017. "Making science suburban: The suburbanization of industrial research and the invention of “research manâ€," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(12), pages 2813-2834, December.
    8. Jean-Dominique Polack & Philippe Taupin & Hyun In Jo & Jin Yong Jeon, 2022. "Urban Soundscapes in the Imaginaries of Native Digital Users: Guidelines for Soundscape Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Ron Boschma & Víctor Martín & Asier Minondo, 2017. "Neighbour regions as the source of new industries," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(2), pages 227-245, June.
    10. Lin Zuo & Jie Zhang & Ronda J Zhang & Yingying Zhang & Meng Hu & Min Zhuang & Wei Liu, 2020. "The Transition of Soundscapes in Tourist Destinations from the Perspective of Residents’ Perceptions: A Case Study of the Lugu Lake Scenic Spot, Southwestern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Henry Louis Taylor, Jr. & D. Gavin Luter & Camden Miller, 2018. "The University, Neighborhood Revitalization, and Civic Engagement: Toward Civic Engagement 3.0," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Claude LACOUR & Sylvette PUISSANT, 2008. "Medium-Sized Cities and the Dynamics of Creative Services," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2008-08, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    13. DeCorla-Souza, Patrick, 2006. "Implementing Congestion Pricing on Metropolitan Highway Networks with Self-Financing Public- Private Partnerships," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 45(1).
    14. Lehel Györfy & Szilárd Madaras, 2017. "Factors Influencing Nuts3 Level Regional Competitiveness In Center Region, Romania. A Panel Regression Analysis," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 11(2), pages 47-61, December.
    15. Stephanos Karagiannis & Dimitrios Apostolou, 2010. "Regional Tourism Development using Linear Programming and Vector Analysis," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 25-32, June.
    16. Ahmed WA Hammad & Ali Akbarnezhad & Assed Haddad & Elaine Garrido Vazquez, 2019. "Sustainable Zoning, Land-Use Allocation and Facility Location Optimisation in Smart Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    17. Nicholas A Phelps & Amparo Tarazona Vento & Sonia Roitman, 2015. "The suburban question: grassroots politics and place making in Spanish suburbs," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(3), pages 512-532, June.
    18. Sood, Suresh C. & Pattinson, Hugh M., 2006. "Urban renewal in Asia-Pacific: A comparative analysis of brainports for Sydney and Kuala Lumpur," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 701-708, June.
    19. Jennifer J Clark, 2014. "Siting ‘Scientific Spaces' in the US: The Push and Pull of Regional Development Strategies and National Innovation Policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(5), pages 880-895, October.
    20. Nicola Bellini & Mikel Landabaso, 2007. "Learning About Innovation in Europe’s Regional Policy," Chapters, in: Roel Rutten & Frans Boekema (ed.), The Learning Region, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:33:y:2011:i:1:p:109-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.