IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v209y2024ics0040162524005602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expect the unimaginable: A document analysis of expectations for 5G in UK newspapers

Author

Listed:
  • Williams, Laurence

Abstract

I conduct a document analysis of two UK national newspapers in order to assess the technological expectations that were expressed about 5G mobile networks over the period 2011–2020. Six themes of expectations are identified in the corpus, namely scepticism over 5G, spectrum and infrastructure, 5G network performance capabilities, technological and industrial competition, 5G as an enabler, and the impacts of 5G. The corpus is dominated by expectations about the national security implications of allowing the Chinese company Huawei to play a role in the UK's 5G networks, and debates over this issue drive an increase in both coverage and expectations in general towards the end of the timeline. A number of strategies used to generate expectation credibility and legitimacy for 5G are identified, as are a number of key performative effects evident within the corpus. The findings reported here build on and contribute to existing work on mobile communications and technological expectations for ICTs, and offer two key conceptual insights – the identification of an ‘expect the unimaginable’ discourse, and the identification of subtle discursive strategies that contribute to the realisation of 5G by obscuring choice and preventing resistance rather than generating legitimacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Williams, Laurence, 2024. "Expect the unimaginable: A document analysis of expectations for 5G in UK newspapers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:209:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524005602
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524005602
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura van Oers & Evelien de Hoop & Eric Jolivet & Simon Marvin & Philipp Spaeth & Rob Raven, 2020. "The politics of smart expectations: Interrogating the knowledge claims of smart mobility," Post-Print hal-03648079, HAL.
    2. van Lente, Harro & Spitters, Charlotte & Peine, Alexander, 2013. "Comparing technological hype cycles: Towards a theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(8), pages 1615-1628.
    3. Bakker, Sjoerd & van Lente, Harro & Meeus, Marius T.H., 2012. "Credible expectations — The US Department of Energy's Hydrogen Program as enactor and selector of hydrogen technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(6), pages 1059-1071.
    4. Kriechbaum, Michael & Posch, Alfred & Hauswiesner, Angelika, 2021. "Hype cycles during socio-technical transitions: The dynamics of collective expectations about renewable energy in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    5. Williams, Laurence & Bergman, Noam, 2023. "Koomey's law forevermore? A document analysis of the production and circulation of the promise of ‘green 5G’," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. Hoppmann, Joern & Anadon, Laura Diaz & Narayanamurti, Venkatesh, 2020. "Why matter matters: How technology characteristics shape the strategic framing of technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Williams, Laurence & Bergman, Noam, 2023. "Koomey's law forevermore? A document analysis of the production and circulation of the promise of ‘green 5G’," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. Kriechbaum, Michael & Posch, Alfred & Hauswiesner, Angelika, 2021. "Hype cycles during socio-technical transitions: The dynamics of collective expectations about renewable energy in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    3. Kriechbaum, Michael & López Prol, Javier & Posch, Alfred, 2018. "Looking back at the future: Dynamics of collective expectations about photovoltaic technology in Germany & Spain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 76-87.
    4. Bojovic, Neva, 2022. "Strategic framing of enabling technologies: Insights from firms digitizing smell and taste," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(3).
    5. Trencher, Gregory & Yarime, Masaru & Yu, Jeongsoo, 2024. "Using emerging technologies to tackle mobility challenges caused by population ageing: Experiences from Japan," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    6. Budde, Björn & Konrad, Kornelia, 2019. "Tentative governing of fuel cell innovation in a dynamic network of expectations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1098-1112.
    7. Hopkins, Debbie & Schwanen, Tim, 2023. "Sociotechnical expectations of vehicle automation in the UK trucking sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    8. Heupel, Kevin & Fonseca, Jorge Arteaga & Rutherford, Matthew & Edwards, Bryan, 2024. "Feeding the hype cycle: Entrepreneurial swagger, passion, and inflated expectations," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(6).
    9. White, Gareth R.T. & Samuel, Anthony, 2019. "Programmatic Advertising: Forewarning and avoiding hype-cycle failure," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 157-168.
    10. Salva Duran-Nebreda & Michael J. O’Brien & R. Alexander Bentley & Sergi Valverde, 2022. "Dilution of expertise in the rise and fall of collective innovation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Hoppmann, Joern, 2021. "Hand in hand to Nowhereland? How the resource dependence of research institutes influences their co-evolution with industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
    12. Ozgun, Burcu & Broekel, Tom, 2021. "The geography of innovation and technology news - An empirical study of the German news media," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Wilson, Charlie & Hargreaves, Tom & Hauxwell-Baldwin, Richard, 2017. "Benefits and risks of smart home technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 72-83.
    14. Reale, Filippo, 2019. "Governing innovation systems: A Parsonian social systems perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    15. Wenxiang Peng & Yutao Lei & Xuan Zhang, 2023. "Analysis of China’s High-Carbon Manufacturing Industry’s Carbon Emissions in the Digital Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-35, October.
    16. Dehler-Holland, Joris & Okoh, Marvin & Keles, Dogan, 2022. "Assessing technology legitimacy with topic models and sentiment analysis – The case of wind power in Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    17. Cohen, Scott & Stienmetz, Jason & Hanna, Paul & Humbracht, Michael & Hopkins, Debbie, 2020. "Shadowcasting tourism knowledge through media: Self-driving sex cars?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    18. Weiss, Daniel & Nemeczek, Fabian, 2021. "A text-based monitoring tool for the legitimacy and guidance of technological innovation systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    19. Raghu Garud & Henri A. Schildt & Theresa K. Lant, 2014. "Entrepreneurial Storytelling, Future Expectations, and the Paradox of Legitimacy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1479-1492, October.
    20. Irina V. Efimenko & Vladimir F. Khoroshevsky, 2017. "Peaks, Slopes, Canyons and Plateaus: Identifying Technology Trends Throughout the Life Cycle," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(02), pages 1-28, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:209:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524005602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.