IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v199y2024ics004016252300714x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Powered by innovation, derailed by disinformation: A multi-country analysis of the influence of online political disinformation on nations' innovation performance

Author

Listed:
  • Vasist, Pramukh Nanjundaswamy
  • Krishnan, Satish

Abstract

A nation's development is determined by its predisposition for innovation and commitment to fostering innovation ecosystems. However, the political structures and disinformation within them represent a significant threat to innovation endeavors. Despite disinformation's far-reaching repercussions, its role in stifling innovation remains largely unknown. Anchored on the need to shed light on its debilitating effects, the current study examines the influence of social media disinformation from the government, political parties, and foreign governments in derailing nations' innovation performance. Drawing upon complexity theory and configurational analysis, the results of a cross-country examination based on data from 2021 to 22 and encompassing 131 nations indicate that the spread of disinformation by governments and political parties poses an increasing threat to innovation performance, surpassing the influence exerted by foreign disinformation. The supplemental analysis reinforces this finding but emphasizes that the risk of foreign disinformation remains a persistent concern for innovation efforts in developed countries. The results have implications for the emergent body of technology research on the dark side of social media and the escalating crisis of false information over the past few years while also extending recent claims regarding the role of political systems in influencing the innovation ecosystem within countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasist, Pramukh Nanjundaswamy & Krishnan, Satish, 2024. "Powered by innovation, derailed by disinformation: A multi-country analysis of the influence of online political disinformation on nations' innovation performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:199:y:2024:i:c:s004016252300714x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004016252300714X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piperopoulos, Panagiotis & Wu, Jie & Wang, Chengqi, 2018. "Outward FDI, location choices and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 232-240.
    2. Weiss, Kyle, 2020. "Seek Truth From Facts (实事求是): How foreign disinformation emerges from domestic propaganda," SocArXiv 6qrn5, Center for Open Science.
    3. Tekic, Anja & Tekic, Zeljko, 2021. "Culture as antecedent of national innovation performance: Evidence from neo-configurational perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 385-396.
    4. Gligor, David & Russo, Ivan & Maloni, Michael J., 2022. "Understanding gender differences in logistics innovation: A complexity theory perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    5. Reynolds, Elisabeth B. & Uygun, Yilmaz, 2018. "Strengthening advanced manufacturing innovation ecosystems: The case of Massachusetts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 178-191.
    6. Hagedoorn, John & Cloodt, Myriam, 2003. "Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1365-1379, September.
    7. Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang & Huarng, Kun-Huang & Lai, Yun Ting, 2021. "Configural analysis of innovation for exploring economic growth," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Marko M. Mihić & Zorica A. Dodevska & Marija Lj. Todorović & Vladimir Lj. Obradović & Dejan Č. Petrović, 2018. "Reducing Risks in Energy Innovation Projects: Complexity Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, August.
    9. Van de Ven, Andrew R., 1986. "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation," Agricultural Research Policy Seminar 139708, University of Minnesota Extension.
    10. Muninger, Marie-Isabelle & Hammedi, Wafa & Mahr, Dominik, 2019. "The value of social media for innovation: A capability perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 116-127.
    11. Prokop, Viktor & Hajek, Petr & Stejskal, Jan, 2021. "Configuration Paths to Efficient National Innovation Ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    12. Ahmad, Mahmood & Jiang, Ping & Majeed, Abdul & Umar, Muhammad & Khan, Zeeshan & Muhammad, Sulaman, 2020. "The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    13. Woodside, Arch G., 2014. "Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2495-2503.
    14. Granstrand, Ove & Holgersson, Marcus, 2020. "Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 90.
    15. Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang & Huarng, Kun-Huang & Huang, Duen-Huang, 2021. "Causal complexity analysis of the Global Innovation Index," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 39-45.
    16. Fagerberg, Jan & Srholec, Martin, 2008. "National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1417-1435, October.
    17. Justin Farrell, 2016. "Network structure and influence of the climate change counter-movement," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(4), pages 370-374, April.
    18. Judge, William Q. & Fainshmidt, Stav & Brown, J. Lee, 2020. "Institutional Systems for Equitable Wealth Creation: Replication and an Update of Judge et al. (2014)," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 5-31, February.
    19. Guo Feng & Xinjie Hu & Kai Wang & Shuo Yan, 2023. "Executives’ Foreign Work Experience and International Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(3), pages 754-771, February.
    20. Wang, Quan-Jing & Feng, Gen-Fu & Wang, Hai-Jie & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2021. "The impacts of democracy on innovation: Revisited evidence," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    21. Andrew H. Van de Ven, 1986. "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 590-607, May.
    22. Ho, Kung-Cheng & Shen, Xixi & Yan, Cheng & Hu, Xiang, 2023. "Influence of green innovation on disclosure quality: Mediating role of media attention," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    23. Bhimani, Hardik & Mention, Anne-Laure & Barlatier, Pierre-Jean, 2019. "Social media and innovation: A systematic literature review and future research directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 251-269.
    24. Ahmad, Manzoor, 2021. "Non-linear dynamics of innovation activities over the business cycles: Empirical evidence from OECD economies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    25. Wu, Pei-Ling & Yeh, Shih-Shuo & Huan, Tzung-Cheng (.T.C.). & Woodside, Arch G., 2014. "Applying complexity theory to deepen service dominant logic: Configural analysis of customer experience-and-outcome assessments of professional services for personal transformations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1647-1670.
    26. Rana P. Maradana & Rudra P. Pradhan & Saurav Dash & Kunal Gaurav & Manju Jayakumar & Debaleena Chatterjee, 2017. "Does innovation promote economic growth? Evidence from European countries," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    27. Huarng, Kun-Huang & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang, 2022. "Analysis of Global Innovation Index by structural qualitative association," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    28. Curado, Carla & Muñoz-Pascual, Lucía & Galende, Jesús, 2018. "Antecedents to innovation performance in SMEs: A mixed methods approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 206-215.
    29. Merlin-Brogniart, Céline & Fuglsang, Lars & Magnussen, Siv & Peralta, Alberto & Révész, Éva & Rønning, Rolf & Rubalcaba, Luis & Scupola, Ada, 2022. "Social innovation and public service: A literature review of multi-actor collaborative approaches in five European countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    30. Pappas, Ilias O. & Woodside, Arch G., 2021. "Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    31. Suominen, Arho & Deschryvere, Matthias & Narayan, Rumy, 2023. "Uncovering value through exploration of barriers - A perspective on intellectual property rights in a national innovation system," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    32. Shane P. Singh, 2019. "Compulsory Voting and Parties’ Vote‐Seeking Strategies," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(1), pages 37-52, January.
    33. Erik E. Lehmann & Nikolaus Seitz, 2017. "Freedom and innovation: a country and state level analysis," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 1009-1029, October.
    34. Hannah Schmid-Petri, 2017. "Politicization of science: how climate change skeptics use experts and scientific evidence in their online communication," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 523-537, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huarng, Kun-Huang & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang, 2022. "Causal complexity analysis for fintech adoption at the country level," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 228-234.
    2. Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang & Huarng, Kun-Huang, 2024. "Causal analysis of SDG achievements," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Erzurumlu, S. Sinan & Erzurumlu, Yaman O. & Yoon, YongKi, 2022. "National innovation systems and dynamic impact of institutional structures on national innovation capability: A configurational approach with the OKID method," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang & Huarng, Kun-Huang, 2023. "Configural analysis of GII’s internal structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & Quiñoá-Piñeiro, Lara & López-Pérez, M. Luisa, 2024. "Water and waste management strategies as drivers of the financial performance of food companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    6. Wang, Wenjing & Lu, Shan, 2021. "University-industry innovation community dynamics and knowledge transfer: Evidence from China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    7. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Jesús Galende, 2020. "Ambidextrous Knowledge and Learning Capability: The Magic Potion for Employee Creativity and Sustainable Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-27, May.
    8. Bigerna, Simona & D'Errico, Maria Chiara & Polinori, Paolo, 2022. "Understanding the green-growth: which pathways cities undertake in their climate programs," MPRA Paper 114156, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Nitesh Pandey & Satish Kumar & Corinne Post & John W. Goodell & Rebeca García-Ramos, 2023. "Board gender diversity and firm performance: A complexity theory perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 1289-1320, September.
    10. Amrita Lahiri & Anu Wadhwa, 2021. "When do serial entrepreneurs found innovative ventures? Evidence from patent data," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1973-1993, December.
    11. Eleftherios K. Soleas, 2020. "Leader strategies for motivating innovation in individuals: a systematic review," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-28, December.
    12. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Jesús Galende, 2020. "Ambidextrous Relationships and Social Capability as Employee Well-Being: The Secret Sauce for Research and Development and Sustainable Innovation Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, April.
    13. Nikookar, Ethan & Gligor, David & Russo, Ivan, 2024. "Supply chain resilience: When the recipe is more important than the ingredients for managing supply chain disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    14. Andrea Ancona & Matteo Cinelli & Giovanna Ferraro & Antonio Iovanella, 2023. "Network-based principles of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a case study of a start-up network," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1497-1514, December.
    15. Huarng, Kun-Huang & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang, 2022. "Analysis of Global Innovation Index by structural qualitative association," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    16. Mingqiu Li & Heng Chen & Jinqiu Li & Xiaolei Liu, 2023. "How to Improve the Synergetic Development Capabilities of the Innovation Ecosystems of High-Tech Industries in China: An fsQCA Analysis Based on the TOE Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-32, August.
    17. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    18. Liu, Zhiqiang & Yan, Miao & Fan, Youqing & Chen, Liling, 2021. "Ascribed or achieved? The role of birth order on innovative behaviour in the workplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 480-492.
    19. Cécile Fonrouge & Cécile Ayerbe, 2005. "Les transitions entre innovations : études de cas et proposition d'une grille d'interprétation," Post-Print halshs-00696111, HAL.
    20. Torres, Pedro & Augusto, Mário & Godinho, Pedro, 2017. "Predicting high consumer-brand identification and high repurchase: Necessary and sufficient conditions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 52-65.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:199:y:2024:i:c:s004016252300714x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.