IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/streco/v53y2020icp377-387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Income distributions in multi-sector analysis; Miyazawa’s fundamental equation of income formation revisited

Author

Listed:
  • Steenge, Albert E.
  • Incera, André Carrascal
  • Serrano, Mònica

Abstract

In standard type 1 input-output models, households’ activities are part of the exogenous final demand. This means that their scale and composition are exogenously determined. That is, if some other final demand categories change (say public investment or exports) this does not influence the behaviour of the household categories. In type 2 input-output models households’ activities are explained endogenously to capture the possibility of mutual interaction between household categories and productive sectors. In this area, Miyazawa (1976) proposed a novel way of modeling the endogenization of households’ activities. In modeling terms, Miyazawa’s proposition resulted in the so-called ‘fundamental equation of income formation’, core of which is an extended input coefficients matrix. This extended coefficients matrix produced several new types of multiplier matrices and explains industrial gross output and households’ income in terms of non-household final demand in great detail. The model is traditionally solved by inverting the new extended coefficients matrix, which often generates highly complex outcomes in terms of convoluted multiplier matrices. Consequently, the link between final demand impulses, gross outputs and income formation is not straightforward, working sometimes in different directions. Regarding this aspect, as we shall show, there is a second way to solve Miyazawa’s fundamental equation, which is much more transparent. This second way shows that Miyazawa type endogenization means that gross output and (remaining) final demand are directly linked via a new type of coefficients matrix. This matrix is the sum of the traditional matrix of intermediate input coefficients and a number of matrices of rank 1, each one corresponding to an endogenized households category. The existence of this matrix makes several new applications possible including the study of shifts over time in the distribution of income and (un)employment between the households categories involved. In an appendix we briefly focus on the link between the use of matrices of rank 1 in, respectively, Leontief, Sraffa and Miyazawa input-output economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Steenge, Albert E. & Incera, André Carrascal & Serrano, Mònica, 2020. "Income distributions in multi-sector analysis; Miyazawa’s fundamental equation of income formation revisited," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 377-387.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:streco:v:53:y:2020:i:c:p:377-387
    DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2019.04.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954349X18304004
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.04.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoffrey J. D. Hewings & Michael Sonis & David Boyce (ed.), 2002. "Trade, Networks and Hierarchies," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-662-04786-6, February.
    2. Graham Pyatt, 2001. "Some Early Multiplier Models of the Relationship between Income Distribution and Production Structure," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 139-163.
    3. Geoffrey J. D. Hewings & Michael Sonis & Moss Madden & Yoshio Kimura (ed.), 1999. "Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-662-03947-2, February.
    4. Yoshio Kimura & Michael Sonis & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings, 2002. "Miyazawa-Sraffa-Leontief Income Distribution Models," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Geoffrey J. D. Hewings & Michael Sonis & David Boyce (ed.), Trade, Networks and Hierarchies, chapter 20, pages 365-383, Springer.
    5. Erik Dietzenbacher & Bart Los & Robert Stehrer & Marcel Timmer & Gaaitzen de Vries, 2013. "The Construction Of World Input-Output Tables In The Wiod Project," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 71-98, March.
    6. Peter W. J. Batey & Adam Z. Rose, 1990. "Extended Input-Output Models: Progress and Potential," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 13(1-2), pages 27-49, April.
    7. Albert E. Steenge & Mònica Serrano, 2012. "Income Distributions In Input-Output Models," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 391-412, July.
    8. Geoffrey Hewings & John Parr, 2007. "Spatial Interdependence in a Metropolitan Setting," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 7-22.
    9. Geoffrey J.D. Hewings & Yasuhide Okuyama & Michael Sonis, 2001. "Economic Interdependence Within the Chicago Metropolitan Area: A Miyazawa Analysis," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 195-217, May.
    10. Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, 1985. "Regional Input-Output Analysis," Wholbk, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, number 11 edited by Grant I. Thrall, Fall.
    11. Yoshio Kimura & Hitoshi Kondo, 1999. "Revisiting Miyazawa on Multisectoral Multipliers," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Geoffrey J. D. Hewings & Michael Sonis & Moss Madden & Yoshio Kimura (ed.), Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure, chapter 3, pages 53-71, Springer.
    12. Cardinale, Ivano, 2018. "A bridge over troubled water: A Structural Political Economy of vertical integration," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 172-179.
    13. Kijin Kim & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings, 2019. "Bayesian estimation of labor demand by age: theoretical consistency and an application to an input–output model," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 44-69, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. E. A. Edinak & A. R. Sayapova & A. A. Shirov, 2022. "Endogenization of Household Consumption in the Expanded Input–Output Model," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-10, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter W. J. Batey & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings, 2021. "Demo-economic Modeling: Review and Prospects," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 44(3-4), pages 328-362, May.
    2. Kristinn Hermannsson, 2016. "Beyond Intermediates: The Role of Consumption and Commuting in the Construction of Local Input–Output Tables," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 315-339, July.
    3. repec:elg:eechap:14395_18 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Oosterhaven, Jan, 2004. "On the definition of key sectors and the stability of net versus gross multipliers," Research Report 04C01, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    5. Mark Partridge & Dan Rickman, 2010. "Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Modelling for Regional Economic Development Analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(10), pages 1311-1328.
    6. J.-P. Ferreira & P. Ramos & L. Cruz & E. Barata, 2017. "Modeling commuting patterns in a multi-regional input–output framework: impacts of an ‘urban re-centralization’ scenario," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 301-317, October.
    7. James A. Giesecke & John R. Madden, 2013. "Evidence-based regional economic policy analysis: the role of CGE modelling," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 6(2), pages 285-301.
    8. Geoffrey J.D. Hewings & Suahasil Nazara & Chokri Dridi, 2004. "Channels of synthesis forty years on: integrated analysis of spatial economic systems," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 7-25, April.
    9. Kazumi Hitomi & Yasuhide Okuyama & Geoffrey Hewings & Michael Sonis, 2000. "The Role of Interregional Trade in Generating Change in the Regional Economies of Japan, 1980-1990," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 515-537.
    10. Hermannsson, Kristinn & McIntyre, Stuart G., 2014. "Local consumption and territorial based accounting for CO2 emissions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-11.
    11. Quanrun Chen & Erik Dietzenbacher & Bart Los, 2015. "Structural decomposition analyses: the differences between applying the semi-closed and the open input–output model," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(8), pages 1713-1735, August.
    12. James Biles, 2004. "Export-oriented Industrialization and Regional Development: A Case Study of Maquiladora Production in Yucatan, Mexico," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 517-532.
    13. Manfred Lenzen & Roberto Schaeffer, 2004. "Environmental and Social Accounting for Brazil," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 27(2), pages 201-226, February.
    14. Alan T. Murray, 2010. "Quantitative Geography," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 143-163, February.
    15. Oscar Tiku & Tetsuo Shimizu, 2022. "Tourism-led economic contribution, interregional repercussion effects, and intersectoral propagation activities in Tokyo Metropolitan," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, December.
    16. Rose, Adam, 1995. "Input-output economics and computable general equilibrium models," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 295-304, August.
    17. repec:rre:publsh:v:37:y:2007:i:1:p:39-63 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Erik Dietzenbacher & Gülay Günlük-Şenesen, 2003. "Demand-Pull and Cost-Push Effects on Labor Income in Turkey, 1973–90," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(10), pages 1785-1807, October.
    19. Glyn Wittwer & Mark Horridge, 2010. "Bringing Regional Detail to a CGE Model using Census Data," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 229-255.
    20. repec:dgr:rugsom:04c01 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Hanson, Kenneth, 2010. "The Food Assistance National Input-Output Multiplier (FANIOM) Model and Stimulus Effects of SNAP," Economic Research Report 262247, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    22. Raúl Del Pozo-Rubio & Fernando Bermejo-Patón & Pablo Moya-Martínez, 2022. "Impact of implementation of the Dependency Act on the Spanish economy: an analysis after the 2008 financial crisis," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 111-128, March.
    23. Giesecke, James A. & Madden, John R., 2013. "Regional Computable General Equilibrium Modeling," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 379-475, Elsevier.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:streco:v:53:y:2020:i:c:p:377-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/525148 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.