IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v82y2012i3p446-454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On extensions of Hoeffding’s inequality for panel data

Author

Listed:
  • Yao, Lili
  • Jiang, Wenxin

Abstract

Hoeffding’s inequality provides a probability bound for the deviation between the average of n independent bounded random variables and its mean. This paper introduces two inequalities that extend Hoeffding’s inequality to panel data, which consists of several mutually independent sequences of dependent data with strong mixing or with a dependence structure being even more general than strong mixing. One is denoted as the Bosq’s Extension which is an extension of Bosq’s inequality (Bosq, 1993) to panel data and the other one is called the Triplex Extension, which extends the Triplex inequality (Jiang, 2009) to panel data. The Bosq’s Extension provides a tighter upper probability bound, while the Triplex Extension is more relaxed in assumption allowing unboundedness and more general dependence than strong mixing. We also apply these two inequalities to establish the convergence rate of empirical risk minimization for high dimensional panel data with variable selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao, Lili & Jiang, Wenxin, 2012. "On extensions of Hoeffding’s inequality for panel data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 446-454.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:82:y:2012:i:3:p:446-454
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2011.11.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715211003567
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2011.11.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Wenxin & Tanner, Martin A., 2010. "Risk Minimization For Time Series Binary Choice With Variable Selection," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(5), pages 1437-1452, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Le-Yu & Lee, Sokbae, 2018. "Best subset binary prediction," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 39-56.
    2. Toru Kitagawa & Weining Wang & Mengshan Xu, 2022. "Policy Choice in Time Series by Empirical Welfare Maximization," Papers 2205.03970, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    3. Christian Brownlees & Gu{dh}mundur Stef'an Gu{dh}mundsson, 2021. "Performance of Empirical Risk Minimization for Linear Regression with Dependent Data," Papers 2104.12127, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    4. Abhik Ghosh & Ayanendranath Basu, 2016. "Robust Bayes estimation using the density power divergence," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 68(2), pages 413-437, April.
    5. Christian Brownlees & Gu{dh}mundur Stef'an Gu{dh}mundsson & Yaping Wang, 2024. "Performance of Empirical Risk Minimization For Principal Component Regression," Papers 2409.03606, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    6. Le-Yu Chen & Sokbae Lee, 2018. "High Dimensional Classification through $\ell_0$-Penalized Empirical Risk Minimization," Papers 1811.09540, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:82:y:2012:i:3:p:446-454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.