IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v65y2003i1p7-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the analysis of paired observations

Author

Listed:
  • Graßhoff, Ulrike
  • Schwabe, Rainer

Abstract

In applications it is common practice to evaluate only the intra-individual differences if paired observations are obtained within individual subjects. In the case of fixed individual effects the corresponding analysis coincides with the standard Gauss-Markov approach while for random effects the analysis may differ.

Suggested Citation

  • Graßhoff, Ulrike & Schwabe, Rainer, 2003. "On the analysis of paired observations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 7-12, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:65:y:2003:i:1:p:7-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(03)00212-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goos, Peter & Vandebroek, Martina, 2001. "-optimal response surface designs in the presence of random block effects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 433-453, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heiko Großmann & Heinz Holling & Ulrike Graßhoff & Rainer Schwabe, 2006. "Optimal Designs for Asymmetric Linear Paired Comparisons with a Profile Strength Constraint," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 109-119, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. GOOS, Peter & VERMEULEN, Bart & VANDEBROEK, Martina, 2008. "D-optimal conjoint choice designs with no-choice options for a nested logit model," Working Papers 2008020, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    2. Arnouts, Heidi & Goos, Peter, 2010. "Update formulas for split-plot and block designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 3381-3391, December.
    3. Payne, Roger W., 2003. "General balance, large data sets and extensions to unbalanced treatment structures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 297-304, October.
    4. Kessels, Roselinde & Goos, Peter & Vandebroek, Martina, 2008. "Optimal designs for conjoint experiments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 2369-2387, January.
    5. Rodney N. Edmondson, 2020. "Multi-level Block Designs for Comparative Experiments," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(4), pages 500-522, December.
    6. Das, Rabindra Nath & Kim, Jinseog & Park, Jeong-Soo, 2015. "Robust D-optimal designs under correlated error, applicable invariantly for some lifetime distributions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 92-100.
    7. Goos, P. & Donev, A.N., 2006. "Blocking response surface designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 1075-1088, November.
    8. Tack, Lieven & Vandebroek, Martina, 2004. "Trend-resistant and cost-efficient cross-over designs for mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 721-746, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:65:y:2003:i:1:p:7-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.