IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v216y2025ics0167715224002360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the intransitivity of the win ratio

Author

Listed:
  • Oakes, David

Abstract

The win-ratio analysis of controlled clinical trials uses pairwise comparisons between patients in the treatment and control group based on a primary outcome, say time to death, with indeterminacies resolved where possible by a secondary outcome, say time to hospitalization. The resulting preferences may not be transitive. Intransitivity occurs when potential follow-up times vary between patients and rankings from the primary events differ from those from secondary events. We characterize the structure of closed loops, derive some general properties of win-ratio preferences and provide simple numerical illustrations. Under realistic assumptions, unless all potential follow-up times are equal, intransitivities are certain to occur in sufficiently large samples, but their overall frequency is low.

Suggested Citation

  • Oakes, David, 2025. "On the intransitivity of the win ratio," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:216:y:2025:i:c:s0167715224002360
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2024.110267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224002360
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2024.110267?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:216:y:2025:i:c:s0167715224002360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.