IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v125y2017icp99-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On randomization-based causal inference for matched-pair factorial designs

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Jiannan
  • Deng, Alex

Abstract

Under the potential outcomes framework, we introduce matched-pair factorial designs, and propose the matched-pair estimator of the factorial effects. We also calculate the randomization-based covariance matrix of the matched-pair estimator, and provide the “Neymanian” estimator of the covariance matrix.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Jiannan & Deng, Alex, 2017. "On randomization-based causal inference for matched-pair factorial designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 99-103.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:125:y:2017:i:c:p:99-103
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2017.02.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715217300561
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2017.02.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samii, Cyrus & Aronow, Peter M., 2012. "On equivalencies between design-based and regression-based variance estimators for randomized experiments," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 365-370.
    2. Lu, Jiannan, 2016. "On randomization-based and regression-based inferences for 2K factorial designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 72-78.
    3. Lu, Jiannan, 2016. "Covariate adjustment in randomization-based causal inference for 2K factorial designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 11-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alqallaf, Fatemah A. & Huda, S. & Mukerjee, Rahul, 2019. "Causal inference from strip-plot designs in a potential outcomes framework," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 55-62.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joel A. Middleton, 2021. "Unifying Design-based Inference: On Bounding and Estimating the Variance of any Linear Estimator in any Experimental Design," Papers 2109.09220, arXiv.org.
    2. Alqallaf, Fatemah A. & Huda, S. & Mukerjee, Rahul, 2019. "Causal inference from strip-plot designs in a potential outcomes framework," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 55-62.
    3. Eszter Czibor & David Jimenez‐Gomez & John A. List, 2019. "The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of)," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(2), pages 371-432, October.
    4. Lu, Jiannan, 2016. "On randomization-based and regression-based inferences for 2K factorial designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 72-78.
    5. Daniel Oto-Peralías & Diego Romero-Ávila, 2016. "The economic consequences of the Spanish Reconquest: the long-term effects of Medieval conquest and colonization," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 409-464, December.
    6. Ding Peng & Li Xinran & Miratrix Luke W., 2017. "Bridging Finite and Super Population Causal Inference," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-8, September.
    7. Susan Athey & Guido Imbens, 2016. "The Econometrics of Randomized Experiments," Papers 1607.00698, arXiv.org.
    8. Lu, Jiannan, 2016. "Covariate adjustment in randomization-based causal inference for 2K factorial designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 11-20.
    9. Zhao, Anqi & Ding, Peng, 2021. "Covariate-adjusted Fisher randomization tests for the average treatment effect," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 278-294.
    10. Alberto Abadie & Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2020. "Sampling‐Based versus Design‐Based Uncertainty in Regression Analysis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 265-296, January.
    11. Haoge Chang & Joel Middleton & P. M. Aronow, 2021. "Exact Bias Correction for Linear Adjustment of Randomized Controlled Trials," Papers 2110.08425, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    12. Jiang, Liang & Phillips, Peter C.B. & Tao, Yubo & Zhang, Yichong, 2023. "Regression-adjusted estimation of quantile treatment effects under covariate-adaptive randomizations," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 758-776.
    13. Alberto Abadie & Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2017. "Sampling-based vs. Design-based Uncertainty in Regression Analysis," Papers 1706.01778, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2019.
    14. Middleton Joel A. & Aronow Peter M., 2015. "Unbiased Estimation of the Average Treatment Effect in Cluster-Randomized Experiments," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1-2), pages 39-75, December.
    15. Liang Jiang & Oliver B. Linton & Haihan Tang & Yichong Zhang, 2022. "Improving Estimation Efficiency via Regression-Adjustment in Covariate-Adaptive Randomizations with Imperfect Compliance," Papers 2201.13004, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    16. Alberto Abadie & Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2014. "Finite Population Causal Standard Errors," NBER Working Papers 20325, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Aronow Peter M. & Middleton Joel A., 2013. "A Class of Unbiased Estimators of the Average Treatment Effect in Randomized Experiments," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 135-154, June.
    18. Zach Branson & Tirthankar Dasgupta, 2020. "Sampling‐based Randomised Designs for Causal Inference under the Potential Outcomes Framework," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(1), pages 101-121, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:125:y:2017:i:c:p:99-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.