IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v108y2016icp1-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The power envelope of panel unit root tests in case stationary alternatives offset explosive ones

Author

Listed:
  • Becheri, I. Gaia
  • Drost, Feike C.
  • van den Akker, Ramon
  • Wichert, Oliver

Abstract

We derive the power envelope for panel unit root tests where heterogeneous alternatives are modeled via zero-expectation random perturbations. We obtain an asymptotically UMP test and discuss how to proceed when one is agnostic about the expectation of the perturbations.

Suggested Citation

  • Becheri, I. Gaia & Drost, Feike C. & van den Akker, Ramon & Wichert, Oliver, 2016. "The power envelope of panel unit root tests in case stationary alternatives offset explosive ones," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-8.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:108:y:2016:i:c:p:1-8
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2015.09.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715215300754
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2015.09.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moon, Hyungsik Roger & Perron, Benoit & Phillips, Peter C.B., 2007. "Incidental trends and the power of panel unit root tests," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 416-459, December.
    2. Gaia Becheri, I. & Drost, Feike C. & Akker, Ramon van den, 2015. "Asymptotically Ump Panel Unit Root Tests—The Effect Of Heterogeneity In The Alternatives," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 539-559, June.
    3. Vaart,A. W. van der, 2000. "Asymptotic Statistics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521784504, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Skrobotov, Anton (Скроботов, Антон) & Turuntseva, Marina (Турунцева, Марина), 2017. "Testing the Hypothesis of a Unit Root for Independent Panels [Тестирование Гипотезы О Наличии Единичного Корня Для Независимых Панелей]," Working Papers 021707, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Westerlund, Joakim & Larsson, Rolf, 2015. "New tools for understanding the local asymptotic power of panel unit root tests," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 59-93.
    2. Oliver Wichert & I. Gaia Becheri & Feike C. Drost & Ramon van den Akker, 2019. "Local Asymptotic Equivalence of the Bai and Ng (2004) and Moon and Perron (2004) Frameworks for Panel Unit Root Testing," Papers 1905.11184, arXiv.org.
    3. Becheri, I.G., 2012. "Limiting experiments for panel-data and jump-diffusion models," Other publications TiSEM 7e53f6cf-fab1-4f86-9e5d-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Samuel Brien & Michael Jansson & Morten Ørregaard Nielsen, 2022. "Nearly Efficient Likelihood Ratio Tests of a Unit Root in an Autoregressive Model of Arbitrary Order," Working Paper 1429, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    5. Skrobotov, Anton (Скроботов, Антон) & Turuntseva, Marina (Турунцева, Марина), 2017. "Testing the Hypothesis of a Unit Root for Independent Panels [Тестирование Гипотезы О Наличии Единичного Корня Для Независимых Панелей]," Working Papers 021707, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    6. Becheri, I.G. & Drost, Feike C. & van den Akker, R., 2013. "Asymptotically UMP Panel Unit Root Tests," Discussion Paper 2013-017, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    7. Norkutė, Milda & Westerlund, Joakim, 2021. "The factor analytical approach in near unit root interactive effects panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 569-590.
    8. Budhi Arta Surya, 2021. "Some results on maximum likelihood from incomplete data: finite sample properties and improved M-estimator for resampling," Papers 2108.01243, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    9. Ho, Sy-Hoa & OUEGHLISSI, Rim & EL FERKTAJI, Riadh, 2019. "The dynamic causality between ESG and economic growth: Evidence from panel causality analysis," MPRA Paper 95390, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Ostadzad, Ali Hossein, 2022. "Innovation and carbon emissions: Fixed-effects panel threshold model estimation for renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 602-617.
    11. Laurent Davezies & Xavier D'Haultfoeuille & Yannick Guyonvarch, 2019. "Empirical Process Results for Exchangeable Arrays," Papers 1906.11293, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    12. Alexander Frankel & Maximilian Kasy, 2022. "Which Findings Should Be Published?," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-38, February.
    13. Seung C. Ahn & Gareth M. Thomas, 2023. "Likelihood-based inference for dynamic panel data models," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 2859-2909, June.
    14. Kasy, Maximilian, 2011. "A nonparametric test for path dependence in discrete panel data," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 172-175.
    15. Graham, Bryan S. & Hahn, Jinyong & Poirier, Alexandre & Powell, James L., 2018. "A quantile correlated random coefficients panel data model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 305-335.
    16. Schweer, Sebastian & Wichelhaus, Cornelia, 2020. "Nonparametric estimation of the service time distribution in discrete-time queueing networks," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(8), pages 4643-4666.
    17. Atı̇la Abdulkadı̇roğlu & Joshua D. Angrist & Yusuke Narita & Parag Pathak, 2022. "Breaking Ties: Regression Discontinuity Design Meets Market Design," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(1), pages 117-151, January.
    18. Karavias, Yiannis & Tzavalis, Elias, 2014. "A fixed-T version of Breitung’s panel data unit root test," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 83-87.
    19. Palm, Franz C. & Smeekes, Stephan & Urbain, Jean-Pierre, 2011. "Cross-sectional dependence robust block bootstrap panel unit root tests," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 163(1), pages 85-104, July.
    20. Luofeng Liao & Christian Kroer, 2024. "Statistical Inference and A/B Testing in Fisher Markets and Paced Auctions," Papers 2406.15522, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:108:y:2016:i:c:p:1-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.