IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spomar/v19y2016i1p6-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doping control in sport: An investigation of how elite athletes perceive and trust the functioning of the doping testing system in their sport

Author

Listed:
  • Overbye, Marie

Abstract

Doping testing is a key component enforced by anti-doping authorities to detect and deter doping in sport. Policy is developed to protect athletes’ right to participate in doping-free sport; and testing is a key tool to secure this right. Accordingly, athletes’ responses to anti-doping efforts are important. This article explores how the International Standards for Testing, which face different interpretations and challenges when policy is implemented, are perceived by elite athletes. Particularly, this article aims to investigate how elite athletes perceive the functioning of the testing system (i.e., the efforts of stakeholders involved in testing) in their own sport both nationally and worldwide. Moreover, it seeks to identify whether specific factors such as previous experience of testing and perceived proximity of doping have an impact on athletes’ perceptions of the testing system. The study comprises a web-based questionnaire (N=645; response rate 43%) and uses qualitative findings to elaborate on and explain quantitative results. Results showed that two-thirds of the athletes reported the national testing programme in their sport to be appropriate. A majority of the athletes who had an opinion on the subject regarded testing programmes in some countries as not extensive enough or believed that in certain countries doping control was downgraded to win medals. Past experience of testing seemed to have a positive influence on trust in the concrete measures; however, if athletes experienced flaws during the control procedures, this could increase distrust and cause worry. The proximity of doping in an athlete's sport influenced the athlete's perception of the testing system. Particularly, athletes who need the testing system to be effective and to function well across the world show greater distrust of or dissatisfaction with the current testing system. The athletes’ diverging views indicate that contemporary anti-doping policy is simultaneously met with support, (dis)trust and frustration. By integrating the views and experiences of Danish elite athletes, this study confirms that the current testing system is confronted with obstacles, and it contributes knowledge about some of the challenges WADA faces when policy is implemented. Implications of results and recommendations for anti-doping authorities are outlined in the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Overbye, Marie, 2016. "Doping control in sport: An investigation of how elite athletes perceive and trust the functioning of the doping testing system in their sport," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 6-22.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:spomar:v:19:y:2016:i:1:p:6-22
    DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2015.10.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441352315000819
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.smr.2015.10.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Engelberg, Terry & Moston, Stephen & Skinner, James, 2015. "The final frontier of anti-doping: A study of athletes who have committed doping violations," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 268-279.
    2. Houlihan, Barrie, 2014. "Achieving compliance in international anti-doping policy: An analysis of the 2009 World Anti-Doping Code," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 265-276.
    3. Barrie Houlihan, 2014. "Achieving compliance in international anti-doping policy: An analysis of the 2009 World Anti-Doping Code," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 265-276, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Henk E. Meier & Marcel Reinold, 2018. "Immunizing Inefficient Field Frames for Mitigating Social Problems: The Institutional Work Behind the Technocratic Antidoping System," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gowthorp, Lisa & Greenhow, Annette & O’Brien, Danny, 2016. "An interdisciplinary approach in identifying the legitimate regulator of anti-doping in sport: The case of the Australian Football League," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 48-60.
    2. Westmattelmann, Daniel & Grotenhermen, Jan-Gerrit & Sprenger, Marius & Rand, William & Schewe, Gerhard, 2021. "Apart we ride together: The motivations behind users of mixed-reality sports," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 316-328.
    3. Verschuuren, Pim, 2020. "Whistleblowing determinants and the effectiveness of reporting channels in the international sports sector," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 142-154.
    4. Daniel Westmattelmann & Marius Sprenger & Sascha Hokamp & Gerhard Schewe, 2020. "Money matters: The impact of prize money on doping behaviour," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 688-703, October.
    5. Flavio Pinto & Yogachandran Rahulamathavan & James Skinner, 2022. "Blockchain for Doping Control Applications in Sports: A Conceptual Approach," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, July.
    6. Kim, Minjung & Kim, Young Do & Lee, Hyun-Woo, 2020. "It is time to consider athletes’ well-being and performance satisfaction: The roles of authentic leadership and psychological capital," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 964-977.
    7. Barkoukis, Vassilis & Kartali, Katerina & Lazuras, Lambros & Tsorbatzoudis, Haralambos, 2016. "Evaluation of an anti-doping intervention for adolescents: Findings from a school-based study," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 23-34.
    8. Zhangyan Deng & Jinyang Guo & Dong Wang & Zuosong Chen, 2022. "A Supplementary Approach for Effective Anti-Doping Education: A Pilot Study Applying Refutation Texts to Modify Misperception of the Whereabouts System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-12, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spomar:v:19:y:2016:i:1:p:6-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/716936/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.