IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spapps/v112y2004i2p225-244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulating the ruin probability of risk processes with delay in claim settlement

Author

Listed:
  • Torrisi, G. L.

Abstract

A risk process with delay in claim settlement is usually described in terms of a Poisson shot-noise process (see Klüppelberg and Mikosch (Bernoulli 1 (1995) 125) and Brémaud (Appl. Probab. 37 (2000) 914)). In particular, proves that under suitable conditions the corresponding ruin probability goes to zero not slower than an exponential rate. This yields problems if we want to estimate the ruin probability by a Monte Carlo simulation. In this paper we overcome these difficulties deriving the asymptotically efficient simulation law.

Suggested Citation

  • Torrisi, G. L., 2004. "Simulating the ruin probability of risk processes with delay in claim settlement," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 225-244, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:112:y:2004:i:2:p:225-244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304-4149(04)00036-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Macci Claudio, 2001. "Simulating Level Crossing Probabilities By Importance Sampling For Non-Decreasing Compound Poisson Processes With Bounded Jumps And A Negative Drift," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 191-202, February.
    2. Peter W. Glynn & Donald L. Iglehart, 1989. "Importance Sampling for Stochastic Simulations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(11), pages 1367-1392, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bohan Chen & Jose Blanchet & Chang-Han Rhee & Bert Zwart, 2019. "Efficient Rare-Event Simulation for Multiple Jump Events in Regularly Varying Random Walks and Compound Poisson Processes," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 919-942, August.
    2. Chengguo Weng & Yi Zhang & Ken Seng Tan, 2013. "Tail Behavior of Poisson Shot Noise Processes under Heavy-tailed Shocks and Actuarial Applications," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 655-682, September.
    3. Dassios, Angelos & Jang, Jiwook & Zhao, Hongbiao, 2015. "A risk model with renewal shot-noise Cox process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 55-65.
    4. Dassios, Angelos & Jang, Jiwook & Zhao, Hongbiao, 2015. "A risk model with renewal shot-noise Cox process," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64051, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Jang, Jiwook & Dassios, Angelos & Zhao, Hongbiao, 2018. "Moments of renewal shot-noise processes and their applications," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87428, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Torrisi, Giovanni Luca & Leonardi, Emilio, 2022. "Asymptotic analysis of Poisson shot noise processes, and applications," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 229-270.
    7. Stabile, Gabriele & Torrisi, Giovanni Luca, 2010. "Large deviations of Poisson shot noise processes under heavy tail semi-exponential conditions," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(15-16), pages 1200-1209, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philippe Jehiel & Jakub Steiner, 2020. "Selective Sampling with Information-Storage Constraints [On interim rationality, belief formation and learning in decision problems with bounded memory]," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 130(630), pages 1753-1781.
    2. Prusty, B Rajanarayan & Jena, Debashisha, 2017. "A critical review on probabilistic load flow studies in uncertainty constrained power systems with photovoltaic generation and a new approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1286-1302.
    3. Dassios, Angelos & Jang, Jiwook & Zhao, Hongbiao, 2015. "A risk model with renewal shot-noise Cox process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 55-65.
    4. N. Hilber & N. Reich & C. Schwab & C. Winter, 2009. "Numerical methods for Lévy processes," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 471-500, September.
    5. Sandeep Juneja & Perwez Shahabuddin, 2001. "Fast Simulation of Markov Chains with Small Transition Probabilities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 547-562, April.
    6. Kaynar, Bahar & Ridder, Ad, 2010. "The cross-entropy method with patching for rare-event simulation of large Markov chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1380-1397, December.
    7. Tito Homem-de-Mello, 2007. "A Study on the Cross-Entropy Method for Rare-Event Probability Estimation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 381-394, August.
    8. N-H Shih, 2005. "Estimating completion-time distribution in stochastic activity networks," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(6), pages 744-749, June.
    9. Helton, J.C. & Johnson, J.D. & Oberkampf, W.L., 2006. "Probability of loss of assured safety in temperature dependent systems with multiple weak and strong links," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 320-348.
    10. T. P. I. Ahamed & V. S. Borkar & S. Juneja, 2006. "Adaptive Importance Sampling Technique for Markov Chains Using Stochastic Approximation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 489-504, June.
    11. Basrak, Bojan & Conroy, Michael & Olvera-Cravioto, Mariana & Palmowski, Zbigniew, 2022. "Importance sampling for maxima on trees," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 139-179.
    12. Francesco Strino & Fabio Parisi & Yuval Kluger, 2011. "VDA, a Method of Choosing a Better Algorithm with Fewer Validations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-8, October.
    13. Xie, Junfei & Wan, Yan & Mills, Kevin & Filliben, James J. & Lei, Yu & Lin, Zongli, 2019. "M-PCM-OFFD: An effective output statistics estimation method for systems of high dimensional uncertainties subject to low-order parameter interactions," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 93-118.
    14. Frikha Noufel & Sagna Abass, 2012. "Quantization based recursive importance sampling," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 18(4), pages 287-326, December.
    15. Steiner, Jakub & Jehiel, Philippe, 2017. "On Second Thoughts, Selective Memory, and Resulting Behavioral Biases," CEPR Discussion Papers 12546, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Fodstad, Marte & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Hellemo, Lars & Knudsen, Brage Rugstad & Pisciella, Paolo & Silvast, Antti & Bordin, Chiara & Schmidt, Sarah & Straus, Julian, 2022. "Next frontiers in energy system modelling: A review on challenges and the state of the art," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    17. Mandjes, M., 1993. "Fast simulation of Markov fluid models in conjunction with large deviations," Serie Research Memoranda 0058, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    18. Bahar Kaynar & Ad Ridder, 2009. "The Cross-Entropy Method with Patching for Rare-Event Simulation of Large Markov Chains," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 09-084/4, Tinbergen Institute.
    19. Søren Asmussen & Reuven Y. Rubinstein, 1999. "Sensitivity Analysis of Insurance Risk Models via Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(8), pages 1125-1141, August.
    20. Youngjun Choe & Henry Lam & Eunshin Byon, 2018. "Uncertainty Quantification of Stochastic Simulation for Black-box Computer Experiments," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1155-1172, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:112:y:2004:i:2:p:225-244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505572/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.