IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v72y2011i7p1096-1104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Breast cancer delay: A grounded model of help-seeking behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Unger-Saldaña, Karla
  • Infante-Castañeda, Claudia B.

Abstract

The conventional definition and classifications of breast cancer delay are based on arbitrary empirical time cut-offs. In general, studies of cancer delay are based on these traditional definitions of patient and provider delay and are essentially atheoretical. If we aim to better understand delay, a reconsideration of its traditional conceptualisation and study methods is warranted. We propose a multidimensional model of breast cancer delay grounded in data from in-depth interviews with symptomatic patients and nested in the theory of illness behaviour. Our results show that delay prior to the first encounter with health services has to do with more than simply the patient as an individual, and delay posterior to this encounter is not due only to the health care providers. In fact, delay is a result of the interplay between the patient's socio-cultural context, individual characteristics that influence symptom interpretation and decision-making, interaction with the social network and types of support obtained, and aspects of the local health services. Future research on cancer delay should approach the problem integrally, taking into account the diverse dimensions involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Unger-Saldaña, Karla & Infante-Castañeda, Claudia B., 2011. "Breast cancer delay: A grounded model of help-seeking behaviour," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(7), pages 1096-1104, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:72:y:2011:i:7:p:1096-1104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(11)00065-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Facione, Noreen C. & Facione, Peter A., 2006. "The cognitive structuring of patient delay in breast cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(12), pages 3137-3149, December.
    2. Dean, Kathryn, 2004. "The role of methods in maintaining orthodox beliefs in health research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 675-685, February.
    3. Mechanic, David, 1995. "Sociological dimensions of illness behavior," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 1207-1216, November.
    4. Katapodi, Maria C. & Facione, Noreen C. & Humphreys, Janice C. & Dodd, Marylin J., 2005. "Perceived breast cancer risk: heuristic reasoning and search for a dominance structure," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 421-432, January.
    5. Caplan, L.S. & May, D.S. & Richardson, L.C., 2000. "Time to diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer: Results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1991-1995," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 90(1), pages 130-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Savvakis Manos & Tzanakis Manolis & Alexias Giorgos, 2015. "Breast Cancer in Contemporary Greece: Economic Dimensions and Socio-Psychological Effects," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 5(3), pages 933-933.
    2. Thomas Deroche & Yannick Stephan & Tim Woodman & Christine Le Scanff, 2012. "Psychological Mediators of the Sport Injury—Perceived Risk Relationship," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 113-121, January.
    3. Johnston, David W. & Shields, Michael A. & Siminski, Peter, 2016. "Long-term health effects of Vietnam-era military service: A quasi-experiment using Australian conscription lotteries," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 12-26.
    4. Normand Carpentier, 2013. "Entry Into a Care Trajectory," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(2), pages 21582440134, June.
    5. Wyke, Sally & Adamson, Joy & Dixon, Diane & Hunt, Kate, 2013. "Consultation and illness behaviour in response to symptoms: A comparison of models from different disciplinary frameworks and suggestions for future research directions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 79-87.
    6. Kelly, Gabrielle, 2017. "Patient agency and contested notions of disability in social assistance applications in South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 109-116.
    7. Landsman, Gail H., 2006. "What evidence, whose evidence?: Physical therapy in New York State's clinical practice guideline and in the lives of mothers of disabled children," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 2670-2680, June.
    8. Aboud, Frances E. & Singla, Daisy R., 2012. "Challenges to changing health behaviours in developing countries: A critical overview," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(4), pages 589-594.
    9. Pajo, Bora & Stuart, Paul H., 2012. "A comparative review of “how to” books for parents of ADHD children and “how to” books for parents of typical children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 826-833.
    10. J. S. Blumenthal-Barby & Heather Krieger, 2015. "Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Medical Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(4), pages 539-557, May.
    11. Venn, Susan & Meadows, Robert & Arber, Sara, 2013. "Gender differences in approaches to self-management of poor sleep in later life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 117-123.
    12. Jacobsen, Grant D. & Jacobsen, Kathryn H., 2011. "Health awareness campaigns and diagnosis rates: Evidence from National Breast Cancer Awareness Month," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 55-61, January.
    13. Andersen, Rikke Sand & Paarup, Bjarke & Vedsted, Peter & Bro, Flemming & Soendergaard, Jens, 2010. "'Containment' as an analytical framework for understanding patient delay: A qualitative study of cancer patients' symptom interpretation processes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 378-385, July.
    14. Cynthia K. Russell & Therese Geraci & Anne Hooper & Linda Shull & David M. Gregory, 1998. "Patients' Explanatory Models for Heart Failure and COPD Exacerbations," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 7(2), pages 164-188, May.
    15. Catherine Cook & Margaret Brunton & Tepora Pukepuke & Ai Ling Tan, 2018. "Exploring communication during the journey from noticing bodily changes to a diagnosis of endometrial cancer," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1262-1275, March.
    16. Liamputtong, Pranee & Haritavorn, Niphattra & Kiatying-Angsulee, Niyada, 2009. "HIV and AIDS, stigma and AIDS support groups: Perspectives from women living with HIV and AIDS in central Thailand," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 862-868, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:72:y:2011:i:7:p:1096-1104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.