IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v66y2008i5p1084-1094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The social nature of natural childbirth

Author

Listed:
  • Mansfield, Becky

Abstract

This paper aims to develop a better understanding of what proponents of natural childbirth mean by "natural." Using a biosocial approach to birth that posits that all birth is both social and natural, the paper investigates how proponents represent the relationship between nature and society. The study asks about what kinds of nature-society relationships are expressed in proponents' representations of natural childbirth. The study examines how natural childbirth is represented by proponents in popular non-fictional English language books written for pregnant women. Claims in these books are not taken as reality, but are analyzed as ideas about nature-society relations. The central finding is that these authors simultaneously emphasize the naturalness of birth and showcase three types of social practices that they describe as being integral to natural childbirth: (1) activity during birth, (2) preparation before birth, and (3) social support, both in an individual and in a broader socio-cultural sense. At least for these authors, it is these social practices that allow natural childbirth to be natural. These findings on the social nature of natural childbirth challenge current social science scholarship, in which natural childbirth is characterized as an essentializing and nostalgic attempt to return to nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Mansfield, Becky, 2008. "The social nature of natural childbirth," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 1084-1094, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:5:p:1084-1094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(07)00608-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hyde, Abbey & Roche-Reid, Bernadette, 2004. "Midwifery practice and the crisis of modernity: implications for the role of the midwife," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(12), pages 2613-2623, June.
    2. Craig J. Thompson, 2005. "Consumer Risk Perceptions in a Community of Reflexive Doubt," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 235-248, September.
    3. Westfall, Rachel Emma & Benoit, Cecilia, 2004. "The rhetoric of "natural" in natural childbirth: childbearing women's perspectives on prolonged pregnancy and induction of labour," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(7), pages 1397-1408, October.
    4. Davis-Floyd, Robbie E., 1994. "The technocratic body: American childbirth as cultural expression," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 1125-1140, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emily Burns, 2015. "More Than Four Walls: The Meaning of Home in Home Birth Experiences," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(2), pages 06-16.
    2. Lopez, Patricia J. & Neely, Abigail H., 2021. "Fundamentally uncaring: The differential multi-scalar impacts of COVID-19 in the U.S," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    3. Malik, Tariq H., 2019. "Society-nature-technology (SNT) nexus: Institutional causes and cures of national morbidities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 491-503.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siddiqui, Shayzal & Smith-Morris, Carolyn, 2022. "Professional competition amidst intractable maternal mortality: Midwifery in rural Pakistan during the COVID-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    2. Everingham, Christine Rosemary & Heading, Gaynor & Connor, Linda, 2006. "Couples' experiences of postnatal depression: A framing analysis of cultural identity, gender and communication," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 1745-1756, April.
    3. Kierans, Ciara, 2011. "Anthropology, organ transplantation and the immune system: Resituating commodity and gift exchange," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(10), pages 1469-1476.
    4. Cait Lamberton & Tom Wein & Andrew Morningstar & Sakshi Ghai, 2024. "Marketing’s role in promoting dignity and human rights: A conceptualization for assessment and future research," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 1391-1411, October.
    5. Tully, Kristin P. & Ball, Helen L., 2013. "Misrecognition of need: Women's experiences of and explanations for undergoing cesarean delivery," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 103-111.
    6. Shaw, Rebecca & Kitzinger, Celia, 2005. "Calls to a home birth helpline: Empowerment in childbirth," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(11), pages 2374-2383, December.
    7. Rebecca Scott & Julien Cayla & Bernard Cova, 2017. "Selling Pain to the Saturated Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(1), pages 22-43.
    8. Kroll, Camille & Murphy, Julia & Poston, Lindsay & You, Whitney & Premkumar, Ashish, 2022. "Cultivating the ideal obstetrical patient: How physicians-in-training describe pain associated with childbirth," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    9. Bettany, Shona M. & Kerrane, Ben & Hogg, Margaret K., 2014. "The material-semiotics of fatherhood: The co-emergence of technology and contemporary fatherhood," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1544-1551.
    10. Atkin, Karl & Berghs, Maria & Dyson, Simon, 2015. "‘Who's the guy in the room?’ Involving fathers in antenatal care screening for sickle cell disorders," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 212-219.
    11. Emily Burns, 2015. "More Than Four Walls: The Meaning of Home in Home Birth Experiences," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(2), pages 06-16.
    12. Palmquist, Aunchalee E.L. & Holdren, Sarah M. & Fair, Cynthia D., 2020. "“It was all taken away”: Lactation, embodiment, and resistance among mothers caring for their very-low-birth-weight infants in the neonatal intensive care unit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    13. Neiterman, Elena & Fox, Bonnie, 2017. "Controlling the unruly maternal body: Losing and gaining control over the body during pregnancy and the postpartum period," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 142-148.
    14. Seo, Yuri, 2016. "Professionalized consumption and identity transformations in the field of eSports," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 264-272.
    15. Lez Trujillo Torres & Benét DeBerry-Spence, 2019. "Consumer valorization strategies in traumatic extraordinary experiences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 516-531, May.
    16. El-Nemer, Amina & Downe, Soo & Small, Neil, 2006. "'She would help me from the heart': An ethnography of Egyptian women in labour," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 81-92, January.
    17. Namey, Emily E. & Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, 2010. "The meaning of "control" for childbearing women in the US," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(4), pages 769-776, August.
    18. Cheryl Nakata & Elif Izberk-Bilgin & Lisa Sharp & Jelena Spanjol & Anna Shaojie Cui & Stephanie Y. Crawford & Yazhen Xiao, 2019. "Chronic illness medication compliance: a liminal and contextual consumer journey," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 192-215, March.
    19. McColl-Kennedy, Janet R. & Cheung, Lilliemay & Coote, Leonard V., 2020. "Tensions and trade-offs in multi-actor service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 655-666.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:5:p:1084-1094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.