IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v57y2003i1p135-145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"I'll give up smoking when you get me better": patients' resistance to attempts to problematise smoking in general practice (GP) consultations

Author

Listed:
  • Pilnick, Alison
  • Coleman, Tim

Abstract

This paper focuses on general practice consultations where the issue of patients' smoking is raised and problematised by general practitioners (GPs) by linking it to their presenting or ongoing medical conditions. The data are taken from a larger study in one country of the UK, of the factors influencing discussion of smoking between GPs and patients who smoke. Consultations have been examined informed by the conversation analysis literature, with a focus on patients' resistance to doctors' problematisation of smoking. It is argued that, despite evidence from other areas of health care that advice is most effective when it is personalised, and despite GPs' expressed views that a preferred way of topicalising smoking is to make links to a patient's current medical problems, this is not generally the case in these consultations. Linking smoking to current problems commonly results in explicit resistance from patients of a kind that is rarely seen in other medical consultations. It is postulated that this results from the moral implications of linking a person's health status with their own behaviour, thereby undermining their claim to legitimate illness and to medical help.

Suggested Citation

  • Pilnick, Alison & Coleman, Tim, 2003. ""I'll give up smoking when you get me better": patients' resistance to attempts to problematise smoking in general practice (GP) consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 135-145, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:57:y:2003:i:1:p:135-145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(02)00336-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kushida, Shuya & Kawashima, Michie & Abe, Tetsuya, 2020. "Why this clinic now? A context-sensitive aspect of accounting for visits," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    2. Doherty, Carole & Saunders, Mark N.K., 2013. "Elective surgical patients' narratives of hospitalization: The co-construction of safety," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 29-36.
    3. Bergen, Clara, 2020. "The conditional legitimacy of behavior change advice in primary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    4. Wheat, H. & Barnes, R.K. & Aveyard, P. & Stevenson, F. & Begh, R., 2022. "Brief opportunistic interventions by general practitioners to promote smoking cessation: A conversation analytic study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    5. de Kok, B.C. & Widdicombe, S. & Pilnick, A. & Laurier, E., 2018. "Doing patient-centredness versus achieving public health targets: A critical review of interactional dilemmas in ART adherence support," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 17-25.
    6. Pilnick, Alison & Coleman, Tim, 2006. "Death, depression and 'defensive expansion': Closing down smoking as an issue for discussion in GP consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2500-2512, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:57:y:2003:i:1:p:135-145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.