IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v265y2020ics0277953620304974.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why this clinic now? A context-sensitive aspect of accounting for visits

Author

Listed:
  • Kushida, Shuya
  • Kawashima, Michie
  • Abe, Tetsuya

Abstract

In presenting problems in medical consultations, patients face the task of justifying their visit to the doctor. Previous studies have shown that patients establish the legitimacy of their visit by characterizing their problem as “doctorable” and presenting themselves as reasonable patients (Halkowski, 2006; Heritage and Robinson, 2006). This study explores a context-sensitive aspect of this justification issue by analyzing patients' first visits to a department of general medicine under the Japanese “free access” system. Patients are shown to present their problem in a way that conveys its relevance to the particular medical setting: they characterize their problem as suitable for relatively high-level medical care or as not easily falling under other specialties. The patient's problem's relevance to the setting is treated as normative in that participants take measures to remedy the possible mismatch between the problem and the setting. The institutional arrangement of the Japanese free access system is “talked into being” as a relevant context for the consultations through the practices participants use to establish the legitimacy of their visits.

Suggested Citation

  • Kushida, Shuya & Kawashima, Michie & Abe, Tetsuya, 2020. "Why this clinic now? A context-sensitive aspect of accounting for visits," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:265:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620304974
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953620304974
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113278?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Llanwarne, Nadia & Newbould, Jennifer & Burt, Jenni & Campbell, John L. & Roland, Martin, 2017. "Wasting the doctor's time? A video-elicitation interview study with patients in primary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 113-122.
    2. Pilnick, Alison & Coleman, Tim, 2003. ""I'll give up smoking when you get me better": patients' resistance to attempts to problematise smoking in general practice (GP) consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 135-145, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kushida, Shuya & Kawashima, Michie & Abe, Tetsuya, 2021. "Recommending no further treatment: Gatekeeping work of generalists at a Japanese university hospital," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wheat, H. & Barnes, R.K. & Aveyard, P. & Stevenson, F. & Begh, R., 2022. "Brief opportunistic interventions by general practitioners to promote smoking cessation: A conversation analytic study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    2. Mackintosh, Nicola & Gong, Qian (Sarah) & Hadjiconstantinou, Michelle & Verdezoto, Nervo, 2021. "Digital mediation of candidacy in maternity care: Managing boundaries between physiology and pathology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    3. de Kok, B.C. & Widdicombe, S. & Pilnick, A. & Laurier, E., 2018. "Doing patient-centredness versus achieving public health targets: A critical review of interactional dilemmas in ART adherence support," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 17-25.
    4. Macdonald, Sara & Conway, Elaine & Bikker, Annemieke & Browne, Susan & Robb, Kathryn & Campbell, Christine & Steele, Robert JC. & Weller, David & Macleod, Una, 2019. "Making sense of bodily sensations: Do shared cancer narratives influence symptom appraisal?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 31-39.
    5. Bergen, Clara, 2020. "The conditional legitimacy of behavior change advice in primary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    6. Doherty, Carole & Saunders, Mark N.K., 2013. "Elective surgical patients' narratives of hospitalization: The co-construction of safety," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 29-36.
    7. Pilnick, Alison & Coleman, Tim, 2006. "Death, depression and 'defensive expansion': Closing down smoking as an issue for discussion in GP consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2500-2512, May.
    8. MacLean, Alice & Hunt, Kate & Smith, Sarah & Wyke, Sally, 2017. "Does gender matter? An analysis of men's and women's accounts of responding to symptoms of lung cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 134-142.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:265:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620304974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.