IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v54y2002i12p1755-1765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilization of health facilities and trained birth attendants for childbirth in rural Bangladesh: an empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Paul, Bimal Kanti
  • Rumsey, Deborah J.

Abstract

The majority of births in rural Bangladesh are carried out in unhygienic conditions by relatives and traditional birth attendants (TBAs). This results in a high incidence of maternal and infant mortality that could be reduced if childbirth were to occur in health centers or under the supervision of trained TBAs (TTBAs). In this paper, we examined factors associated with utilization of modern health resources for childbirth in 39 villages of Bangladesh. We followed a retrospective survey research design to collect relevant information from couples who experienced childbirth during a two-year period from July 1, 1995 to June 1997. The data indicate that slightly over 11% of the deliveries were performed by trained personnel with the rest attended by TBAs. Multivariate analysis clearly shows that delivery complications was the most significant factor determining the use of modern health care resources for childbirth, followed by parental education, and pre-natal care. We conclude that quick response to delivery complications and improved access to hospitals and TTBAs can reduce the risk of infant and maternal mortality and morbidity in rural Bangladesh.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul, Bimal Kanti & Rumsey, Deborah J., 2002. "Utilization of health facilities and trained birth attendants for childbirth in rural Bangladesh: an empirical study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1755-1765, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:54:y:2002:i:12:p:1755-1765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(01)00148-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gayen, Kaberi & Raeside, Robert, 2007. "Social networks, normative influence and health delivery in rural Bangladesh," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 900-914, September.
    2. Güneş, Pınar Mine, 2015. "The role of maternal education in child health: Evidence from a compulsory schooling law," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-16.
    3. Henock Yebyo & Mussie Alemayehu & Alemayehu Kahsay, 2015. "Why Do Women Deliver at Home? Multilevel Modeling of Ethiopian National Demographic and Health Survey Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Head, Sara K. & Yount, Kathryn M. & Sibley, Lynn M., 2011. "Delays in recognition of and Care-seeking response to prolonged labor in Bangladesh," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(7), pages 1157-1168, April.
    5. Meera Chatterjee & Ruth Levine & Nirmala Murthy & Shreelata Rao-Seshadri, 2008. "Sparing Lives : Better Reproductive Health for Poor Women in South Asia, Summary for Policymakers," World Bank Publications - Reports 7848, The World Bank Group.
    6. Md. Sabuj Ali & Mst. Dilara Pervin & S. M. Abu Saeed, 2018. "Antenatal care taking behavior of Bangladeshi women," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 2(4), pages 547-557.
    7. Spangler, Sydney A. & Bloom, Shelah S., 2010. "Use of biomedical obstetric care in rural Tanzania: The role of social and material inequalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(4), pages 760-768, August.
    8. Finn McGuire & Noemi Kreif & Peter C. Smith, 2021. "The effect of distance on maternal institutional delivery choice: Evidence from Malawi," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(9), pages 2144-2167, September.
    9. Fiifi Amoako Johnson & Sabu S Padmadas & Zoë Matthews, 2013. "Are Women Deciding against Home Births in Low and Middle Income Countries?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-10, June.
    10. Parkhurst, Justin Oliver & Rahman, Syed Azizur, 2007. "Life saving or money wasting?: Perceptions of caesarean sections among users of services in rural Bangladesh," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 392-401, March.
    11. Heaton, Tim B. & Forste, Renata & Hoffmann, John P. & Flake, Dallan, 2005. "Cross-national variation in family influences on child health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 97-108, January.
    12. Rishworth, Andrea & Dixon, Jenna & Luginaah, Isaac & Mkandawire, Paul & Tampah Prince, Caesar, 2016. "“I was on the way to the hospital but delivered in the bush”: Maternal health in Ghana's Upper West Region in the context of a traditional birth attendants' ban," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 8-17.
    13. Edmonds, Joyce K. & Hruschka, Daniel & Bernard, H. Russell & Sibley, Lynn, 2012. "Women’s social networks and birth attendant decisions: Application of the Network-Episode Model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 452-459.
    14. Story, William T. & Burgard, Sarah A., 2012. "Couples’ reports of household decision-making and the utilization of maternal health services in Bangladesh," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(12), pages 2403-2411.
    15. Jahar Bhowmik & Raaj Kishore Biswas & Nurjahan Ananna, 2020. "Women’s education and coverage of skilled birth attendance: An assessment of Sustainable Development Goal 3.1 in the South and Southeast Asian Region," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:54:y:2002:i:12:p:1755-1765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.