IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aif/journl/v2y2018i4p547-557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antenatal care taking behavior of Bangladeshi women

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Sabuj Ali
  • Mst. Dilara Pervin
  • S. M. Abu Saeed

Abstract

Maternal health is the health of women during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period. Maternal health comprises the health of women during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period. Health problems during pregnancy may have serious consequences, not only for the woman but also for her child, her family, and her community. This paper is about the health care taking behavior during pregnancy (Antenatal Care) which is an important indicator of the utilization of Maternal Health Care Services (MHC) in Bangladesh. In our study we have focused on the factors that affect the antenatal care. In our study to define the antenatal care we paid our interest of a woman’s antenatal visit, getting care from doctor, nurse, family welfare visitor (FWV), medical assistant/sub-assistant community medical officer (MA/SACMO). For this study, we used secondary data extracted from BDHS-2011, which is a national representative survey of the 15-49 years age groups women. The analysis has been carried out over 7,315 women who have fulfilled the study eligibility criteria. To see the effect of socio-economic and demographic factors on antenatal care (ANC), One way ANOVA was carried out for bivariate analysis and Generalized linear models (GLM) with log link function was carried out for multivariate analysis. In bivariate analysis it has been found that Type of place of residence, Media Exposure Educational level of Respondent, Husband/partner’s education level, Region, Religion, Wealth index, Belong to NGO and Age of mother at birth has significant effect on antenatal care (ANC).

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Sabuj Ali & Mst. Dilara Pervin & S. M. Abu Saeed, 2018. "Antenatal care taking behavior of Bangladeshi women," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 2(4), pages 547-557.
    • Handle: RePEc:aif:journl:v:2:y:2018:i:4:p:547-557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsab.com/wp-content/uploads/273.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ijsab.com/volume-2-issue-4/1384
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul, Bimal Kanti & Rumsey, Deborah J., 2002. "Utilization of health facilities and trained birth attendants for childbirth in rural Bangladesh: an empirical study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1755-1765, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gayen, Kaberi & Raeside, Robert, 2007. "Social networks, normative influence and health delivery in rural Bangladesh," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 900-914, September.
    2. Finn McGuire & Noemi Kreif & Peter C. Smith, 2021. "The effect of distance on maternal institutional delivery choice: Evidence from Malawi," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(9), pages 2144-2167, September.
    3. Edmonds, Joyce K. & Hruschka, Daniel & Bernard, H. Russell & Sibley, Lynn, 2012. "Women’s social networks and birth attendant decisions: Application of the Network-Episode Model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 452-459.
    4. Jahar Bhowmik & Raaj Kishore Biswas & Nurjahan Ananna, 2020. "Women’s education and coverage of skilled birth attendance: An assessment of Sustainable Development Goal 3.1 in the South and Southeast Asian Region," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Rishworth, Andrea & Dixon, Jenna & Luginaah, Isaac & Mkandawire, Paul & Tampah Prince, Caesar, 2016. "“I was on the way to the hospital but delivered in the bush”: Maternal health in Ghana's Upper West Region in the context of a traditional birth attendants' ban," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 8-17.
    6. Head, Sara K. & Yount, Kathryn M. & Sibley, Lynn M., 2011. "Delays in recognition of and Care-seeking response to prolonged labor in Bangladesh," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(7), pages 1157-1168, April.
    7. Parkhurst, Justin Oliver & Rahman, Syed Azizur, 2007. "Life saving or money wasting?: Perceptions of caesarean sections among users of services in rural Bangladesh," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 392-401, March.
    8. Story, William T. & Burgard, Sarah A., 2012. "Couples’ reports of household decision-making and the utilization of maternal health services in Bangladesh," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(12), pages 2403-2411.
    9. Güneş, Pınar Mine, 2015. "The role of maternal education in child health: Evidence from a compulsory schooling law," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-16.
    10. Meera Chatterjee & Ruth Levine & Nirmala Murthy & Shreelata Rao-Seshadri, 2008. "Sparing Lives : Better Reproductive Health for Poor Women in South Asia, Summary for Policymakers," World Bank Publications - Reports 7848, The World Bank Group.
    11. Spangler, Sydney A. & Bloom, Shelah S., 2010. "Use of biomedical obstetric care in rural Tanzania: The role of social and material inequalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(4), pages 760-768, August.
    12. Heaton, Tim B. & Forste, Renata & Hoffmann, John P. & Flake, Dallan, 2005. "Cross-national variation in family influences on child health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 97-108, January.
    13. Fiifi Amoako Johnson & Sabu S Padmadas & Zoë Matthews, 2013. "Are Women Deciding against Home Births in Low and Middle Income Countries?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-10, June.
    14. Henock Yebyo & Mussie Alemayehu & Alemayehu Kahsay, 2015. "Why Do Women Deliver at Home? Multilevel Modeling of Ethiopian National Demographic and Health Survey Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aif:journl:v:2:y:2018:i:4:p:547-557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Farjana Rahman (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.