IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v40y1995i4p491-502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why do women report 'sick building symptoms' more often than men?

Author

Listed:
  • Stenberg, Berndt
  • Wall, Stig

Abstract

The prevalence of general, mucosal and skin symptoms compatible with the 'Sick Building Syndrome' (SBS) was studied in Swedish office workers. The marked excess in symptom prevalence among females, 12% SBS cases as compared to 4% among males, was analysed with respect to differences in biological or acquired risks and different illness and reporting (interview) behaviour among males and females. The distribution of risk indicators for symptoms was recorded in a questionnaire to 4943 employees. The skin symptom questions were validated in a clinical examination. Most risk indicators, such as paper work and psychosocial work load, had an unfavourable distribution for females. In the multivariate analysis however, female sex remained the most prominent risk indicator almost unaffected by the addition of other factors. Neither did effect modification contribute to the excess prevalence among females. The results from the clinical examination indicate that the excess symptom prevalence among females is real and not a reporting artefact. As the factors studied did not explain the excess symptom prevalence among females, the sex differential observed can be a reflection of a general excess of psychosomatic symptoms among women. Although inequalities in social conditions did not substantially explain the sex differential in symptom reporting, the importance of life situation and social roles should be further explored. As the studied variables are surrogates for actual measurements, another important issue is whether sex differences in working conditions, entailing different hierarchical positions in the office, have consequences for indoor air quality factors that are important for the symptoms. The study strongly underlines the importance of taking the sex distribution into account when surveying risk indicators for SBS symptoms.

Suggested Citation

  • Stenberg, Berndt & Wall, Stig, 1995. "Why do women report 'sick building symptoms' more often than men?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 491-502, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:4:p:491-502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)E0104-Z
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carol Emslie & Kate Hunt & Sally Macintyre, 1999. "`Gender' or `Job' Differences? Working Conditions amongst Men and Women in White-Collar Occupations," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 13(4), pages 711-729, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:4:p:491-502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.