IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v363y2024ics0277953624008347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Difficult decisions and possible choices: Rare diseases, genetic inheritance and reproduction of the family

Author

Listed:
  • Aureliano, Waleska

Abstract

This article sets out to explore the dilemmas present in the reproductive practices of people affected by rare hereditary diseases, focusing on the use of diagnostic tests and the practice of genetic counselling in Brazil. The development of technologies capable of mapping ‘genetic flaws’ prior to conception or in prenatal consultations has led researchers to consider how these technologies may be shaping contemporary subjectivities related to kinship and guiding reproductive decisions based on knowledge of our ‘genetic heritage.’ Genetic counselling has emerged in this setting as a modality of health knowledge and information capable of assisting people, especially women, in their reproductive choices. In Brazil, access to these technologies and their use has proven to be unequal and heterogeneous. I argue that the idea of ‘choice’ that permeates genetic counselling needs to be problematized by considering the social, cultural, economic, affective and moral frameworks in which women are inserted and that inform and/or determine their reproductive decisions. Based on this premise, I analyse how families ‘at risk’ of rare hereditary diseases deal with the idea of ‘genetic inheritance’ in relation to the ‘wish to have children’, and the impasses surrounding the idea of ‘informed choice’ when we evaluate this rhetoric in the context of the shortfalls in access to healthcare and the limits to reproductive justice in Brazil.

Suggested Citation

  • Aureliano, Waleska, 2024. "Difficult decisions and possible choices: Rare diseases, genetic inheritance and reproduction of the family," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 363(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:363:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624008347
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624008347
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117380?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boardman, Felicity Kate, 2014. "The expressivist objection to prenatal testing: The experiences of families living with genetic disease," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 18-25.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davidson, Hannah R. & Jamal, Leila & Mueller, Rebecca & Similuk, Morgan & Owczarzak, Jill, 2024. "Renegotiation, uncertainty, imagination: Assemblage perspectives on reproductive and family planning with an Inborn Error of immunity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    2. Mendes, Álvaro & Sousa, Liliana & Sequeiros, Jorge & Clarke, Angus, 2017. "Discredited legacy: Stigma and familial amyloid polyneuropathy in Northwestern Portugal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 73-80.
    3. Clarke, Angus, 2016. "Anticipated stigma and blameless guilt: Mothers' evaluation of life with the sex-linked disorder, hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XHED)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 141-148.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:363:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624008347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.