IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v35y1992i2p189-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A classification of psychological distress for use in primary care settings

Author

Listed:
  • Goldberg, David

Abstract

This paper contrasts three ways of conceptualizing emotional distress in general medical settings: high scorers on screening test, 'cases' according to the doctor seeing them, and standardized research diagnoses. It is shown that distress as measured by screening test is very much more prevalent than research diagnosis, and yet doctors working in general medical settings need to be able to conceptualize disorders using a classification that is helpful for them. The proposed classification is based upon the patient's need for intervention, and it distinguishes the few who need to be thought of as having a formal mental disorder from the many who do not. It takes account of what is known about 'labelling' and compliance, and it is linked to the skills needed by primary care workers. The largest group consists of those whose emotional distress needs recognition and discussion; the next group also needs social interventions; while the final group benefits from recognition of a mental disorder which necessitates a medical or psychological treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Goldberg, David, 1992. "A classification of psychological distress for use in primary care settings," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 189-193, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:35:y:1992:i:2:p:189-193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(92)90166-N
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Forrester, Donald & Westlake, David & Killian, Mike & Antonopoulou, Vivi & McCann, Michelle & Thurnham, Angela & Thomas, Roma & Waits, Charlotte & Whittaker, Charlotte & Hutchison, Dougal, 2018. "A randomized controlled trial of training in Motivational Interviewing for child protection," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 180-190.
    2. Dinesh Bhugra, 1997. "Setting Up Psychiatric Services: Cross-Cultural Issues in Planning and Delivery," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 43(1), pages 16-28, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:35:y:1992:i:2:p:189-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.