IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v358y2024ics0277953624005367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual, social and area level factors associated with older people's walking: Analysis of an UK household panel study (Understanding Society)

Author

Listed:
  • Olsen, Jonathan R.
  • Whitley, Elise
  • Long, Emily
  • Rigby, Benjamin P.
  • Macdonald, Laura
  • Dibben, Grace O.
  • Palmer, Victoria J.
  • Benzeval, Michaela
  • Mitchell, Kirstin
  • McCann, Mark
  • Anderson, Martin
  • Thomson, Meigan
  • Moore, Laurence
  • Simpson, Sharon A.

Abstract

Among older people, walking is a popular and prevalent activity. Walking is key to increasing physical activity levels and resulting physical and mental health. In the context of rapidly ageing populations, it is important to better understand what factors are associated with walking among older people, based on the socioecological model of health.

Suggested Citation

  • Olsen, Jonathan R. & Whitley, Elise & Long, Emily & Rigby, Benjamin P. & Macdonald, Laura & Dibben, Grace O. & Palmer, Victoria J. & Benzeval, Michaela & Mitchell, Kirstin & McCann, Mark & Anderson, M, 2024. "Individual, social and area level factors associated with older people's walking: Analysis of an UK household panel study (Understanding Society)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:358:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624005367
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624005367
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ka-Man Leung & Kai-Ling Ou & Pak-Kwong Chung & Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani, 2021. "Older Adults’ Perceptions toward Walking: A Qualitative Study Using a Social-Ecological Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Guglielmo Bonaccorsi & Federico Manzi & Marco Del Riccio & Nicoletta Setola & Eletta Naldi & Chiara Milani & Duccio Giorgetti & Claudia Dellisanti & Chiara Lorini, 2020. "Impact of the Built Environment and the Neighborhood in Promoting the Physical Activity and the Healthy Aging in Older People: An Umbrella Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-27, August.
    3. Winters, Meghan & Voss, Christine & Ashe, Maureen C. & Gutteridge, Kaitlyn & McKay, Heather & Sims-Gould, Joanie, 2015. "Where do they go and how do they get there? Older adults' travel behaviour in a highly walkable environment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 304-312.
    4. Hae Young Yun, 2019. "Environmental Factors Associated with Older Adult’s Walking Behaviors: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-45, June.
    5. Li, W. & Procter-Gray, E. & Lipsitz, L.A. & Leveille, S.G. & Hackman, H. & Biondolillo, M. & Hannan, M.T., 2014. "Utilitarian walking, neighborhood environment, and risk of outdoor falls among older adults," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(9), pages 30-37.
    6. Anton Pak & Brenda Gannon, 2023. "The effect of neighbourhood and spatial crime rates on mental wellbeing," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 99-134, January.
    7. Lynn, Peter, 2009. "Sample design for Understanding Society," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2009-01, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    8. Zhengying Liu & Astrid Kemperman & Harry Timmermans, 2020. "Location Choice in the Context of Older Adults’ Leisure-Time Walking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Mason, Phil & Kearns, Ade & Livingston, Mark, 2013. "“Safe Going”: The influence of crime rates and perceived crime and safety on walking in deprived neighbourhoods," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 15-24.
    10. Fernando Fonseca & Elisa Conticelli & George Papageorgiou & Paulo Ribeiro & Mona Jabbari & Simona Tondelli & Rui Ramos, 2021. "Levels and Characteristics of Utilitarian Walking in the Central Areas of the Cities of Bologna and Porto," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiabin Yu & Chen Yang & Xiaoguang Zhao & Zhexiao Zhou & Shen Zhang & Diankai Zhai & Jianshe Li, 2021. "The Associations of Built Environment with Older People Recreational Walking and Physical Activity in a Chinese Small-Scale City of Yiwu," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Altorjai, Szilvia, 2013. "Over-qualification of immigrants in the UK," ISER Working Paper Series 2013-11, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    3. Su, Rongxiang & Xiao, Jingyi & McBride, Elizabeth C. & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2021. "Understanding senior's daily mobility patterns in California using human mobility motifs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Eric T. H. Chan & Tim Schwanen & David Banister, 2021. "The role of perceived environment, neighbourhood characteristics, and attitudes in walking behaviour: evidence from a rapidly developing city in China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 431-454, February.
    5. Fernando Fonseca & Escolástica Fernandes & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Walkable Cities: Using the Smart Pedestrian Net Method for Evaluating a Pedestrian Network in Guimarães, Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Bartzokas-Tsiompras, Alexandros & Bakogiannis, Efthimios & Nikitas, Alexandros, 2023. "Global microscale walkability ratings and rankings: A novel composite indicator for 59 European city centres," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Lynn, Peter, 2011. "Maintaining cross-sectional representativeness in a longitudinal general population survey," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2011-04, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    8. Haifeng Zhao & Nosherwan Khaliq & Chunling Li & Judit Oláh, 2024. "In quest of perceived transaction cost’s impact on fintech users’ intention: the moderating role of situational factors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Belloni, Michele & Carrino, Ludovico & Meschi, Elena, 2022. "The impact of working conditions on mental health: Novel evidence from the UK," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Ling Zhang & Kebin Shao & Wenfeng Tang & Stephen Siu Yu Lau & Hongzhan Lai & Yiqi Tao, 2023. "Outdoor Space Elements in Urban Residential Areas in Shenzhen, China: Optimization Based on Health-Promoting Behaviours of Older People," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Orstad, Stephanie L. & McDonough, Meghan H. & Klenosky, David B. & Mattson, Marifran & Troped, Philip J., 2017. "The observed and perceived neighborhood environment and physical activity among urban-dwelling adults: The moderating role of depressive symptoms," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 57-66.
    12. Jiabin Yu & Chen Yang & Shen Zhang & Diankai Zhai & Aiwen Wang & Jianshe Li, 2021. "The Effect of the Built Environment on Older Men?s and Women?s Leisure-Time Physical Activity in the Mid-Scale City of Jinhua, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, January.
    13. Mona Jabbari & Zahra Ahmadi & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Defining a Digital System for the Pedestrian Network as a Conceptual Implementation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, February.
    14. Budd, Sarah & Burton, Jonathan & Gilbert, Emily & Jäckle, Annette & McFall, Stephanie L. & Uhrig, S.C. Noah, 2011. "Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 3: results from methodological experiments," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2011-05, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    15. Mohammad Paydar & Asal Kamani Fard & Marzieh Khaghani, 2020. "Pedestrian Walkways for Health in Shiraz, Iran, the Contribution of Attitudes, and Perceived Environmental Attributes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Mohammad Paydar & Asal Kamani Fard & Verónica Gárate Navarrete, 2023. "Design Characteristics, Visual Qualities, and Walking Behavior in an Urban Park Setting," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    17. Susan A. Carlson & Geoffrey P. Whitfield & Ryan T. Davis & Erin L. Peterson & Janet E. Fulton & David Berrigan, 2021. "Associations between Perceptions and Measures of Weather and Walking, United States—2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-13, August.
    18. Amy Orben & Andrew K. Przybylski & Sarah-Jayne Blakemore & Rogier A. Kievit, 2022. "Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Ka-Man Leung & Kai-Ling Ou & Pak-Kwong Chung & Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani, 2021. "Older Adults’ Perceptions toward Walking: A Qualitative Study Using a Social-Ecological Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Valkiria Amaya & Matthias Chardon & Helen Klein & Thibauld Moulaert & Nicolas Vuillerme, 2022. "What Do We Know about the Use of the Walk-along Method to Identify the Perceived Neighborhood Environment Correlates of Walking Activity in Healthy Older Adults: Methodological Considerations Related ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-37, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:358:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624005367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.