IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v347y2024ics0277953624002168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

First-hand accounts of structural stigma toward people who use opioids on Reddit

Author

Listed:
  • Eschliman, Evan L.
  • Choe, Karen
  • DeLucia, Alexandra
  • Addison, Elizabeth
  • Jackson, Valerie W.
  • Murray, Sarah M.
  • German, Danielle
  • Genberg, Becky L.
  • Kaufman, Michelle R.

Abstract

People who use opioids face multilevel stigma that negatively affects their health and well-being and drives opioid-related overdose. Little research has focused on lived experience of the structural levels of stigma toward opioid use. This study identified and qualitatively analyzed Reddit content about structural stigma toward opioid use. Iterative, human-in-the-loop natural language processing methods were used to identify relevant posts and comments from an opioid-related subforum. Ultimately, 273 posts and comments were qualitatively analyzed via directed content analysis guided by a prominent conceptualization of stigma. Redditors described how structures—including governmental programs and policies, the pharmaceutical industry, and healthcare systems—stigmatize people who use opioids. Structures were reported to stigmatize through labeling (i.e., particularly in medical settings), perpetuating negative stereotypes, separating people who use opioids into those who use opioids “legitimately” versus “illegitimately,” and engendering status loss and discrimination (e.g., denial of healthcare, loss of employment). Redditors also posted robust formulations of structural stigma, mostly describing how it manifests in the criminalization of substance use, is often driven by profit motive, and leads to the pervasiveness of fentanyl in the drug supply and the current state of the overdose crisis. Some posts and comments highlighted interpersonal and structural resources (e.g., other people who use opioids, harm reduction programs, telemedicine) leveraged to navigate structural stigma and its effects. These findings reveal key ways by which structural stigma can pervade the lives of people who use opioids and show the value of social media data for investigating complex social processes. Particularly, this study's findings related to structural separation may help encourage efforts to promote solidarity among people who use opioids. Attending to first-hand accounts of structural stigma can help interventions aiming to reduce opioid-related stigma be more responsive to these stigmatizing structural forces and their felt effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Eschliman, Evan L. & Choe, Karen & DeLucia, Alexandra & Addison, Elizabeth & Jackson, Valerie W. & Murray, Sarah M. & German, Danielle & Genberg, Becky L. & Kaufman, Michelle R., 2024. "First-hand accounts of structural stigma toward people who use opioids on Reddit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:347:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624002168
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624002168
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116772?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303523_0 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Faulkner-Gurstein, Rachel, 2017. "The social logic of naloxone: Peer administration, harm reduction, and the transformation of social policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 20-27.
    3. Kennedy, M.C. & Kerr, T., 2017. "Overdose prevention in the United States: A call for supervised injection sites," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(1), pages 42-43.
    4. Abrams, Jasmine A. & Tabaac, Ariella & Jung, Sarah & Else-Quest, Nicole M., 2020. "Considerations for employing intersectionality in qualitative health research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Chaoxiong, 2022. "Building care amid navigating liability risks: The possibility of policy-driven care in China's drug-control arena," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    2. Brothers, Sarah, 2019. "A good “doctor” is hard to find: Assessing uncredentialed expertise in assisted injection," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Gulay Jannat & Kyoko Kusakabe, 2024. "Women’s Participation in Community-Based Adaptation to Climate Change (CBACC): An Intersectional Analysis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Daniel Holman & Alan Walker, 2021. "Understanding unequal ageing: towards a synthesis of intersectionality and life course analyses," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 239-255, June.
    5. Fiona Mercer & Joanna Astrid Miler & Bernie Pauly & Hannah Carver & Kristina Hnízdilová & Rebecca Foster & Tessa Parkes, 2021. "Peer Support and Overdose Prevention Responses: A Systematic ‘State-of-the-Art’ Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Collins, Alexandra B. & Boyd, Jade & Cooper, Hannah L.F. & McNeil, Ryan, 2019. "The intersectional risk environment of people who use drugs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 234(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Closson, Kalysha & Lee, Gem Y. & Osborne, Zoë & Hangle, Colby & Nemutambwe, Tadiwa & Raj, Anita & Leonce, Ivan & Kaida, Angela, 2024. "“Nobody has written the book about what non-binary people should put forward in relationships”: Exploring gender equity in relationships of queer, trans, and non-monogamous young women and non-binary ," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).
    8. Efird, Caroline R. & Barrington, Clare & Metzl, Jonathan M. & Muessig, Kathryn E. & Matthews, Derrick D. & Lightfoot, Alexandra F., 2023. "“We grew up in the church”: A critical discourse analysis of Black and White rural residents’ perceptions of mental health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    9. San Juanita García & Taylor Trummel & Monica Cornejo & Katherine Maldonado & Ana Ojeda & Humberto Flores & Bruce G. Link, 2021. "Immigrant Health Inequities: Exposing Diversions and White Supremacy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Abboud, Sarah & Seal, David W. & Pachankis, John E. & Khoshnood, Kaveh & Khouri, Danielle & Fouad, Fouad M. & Heimer, Robert, 2023. "Experiences of stigma, mental health, and coping strategies in Lebanon among Lebanese and displaced Syrian men who have sex with men: A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    11. Olding, Michelle & Boyd, Jade & Kerr, Thomas & McNeil, Ryan, 2021. "“And we just have to keep going”: Task shifting and the production of burnout among overdose response workers with lived experience," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    12. Göttgens, Irene & Modderkolk, Linda & Jansen, Corine & Darweesh, Sirwan K.L. & Bloem, Bastiaan R. & Oertelt-Prigione, Sabine, 2023. "The salience of gender in the illness experiences and care preferences of people with Parkinson's disease," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    13. Andrea Leuenberger & Olga Cambaco & Hyacinthe R. Zabré & Isaac Lyatuu & Jürg Utzinger & Khátia Munguambe & Sonja Merten & Mirko S. Winkler, 2021. "“It Is Like We Are Living in a Different World” : Health Inequity in Communities Surrounding Industrial Mining Sites in Burkina Faso, Mozambique, and Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Kennedy, Mary Clare & Boyd, Jade & Mayer, Samara & Collins, Alexandra & Kerr, Thomas & McNeil, Ryan, 2019. "Peer worker involvement in low-threshold supervised consumption facilities in the context of an overdose epidemic in Vancouver, Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 60-68.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:347:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624002168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.