IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v342y2024ics0277953623009127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“We are just not sure what that means or if it's relevant”: Uncertainty when gathering family history information in South African prenatal genetic counseling consultations

Author

Listed:
  • Scott, Megan
  • Watermeyer, Jennifer
  • Wessels, Tina-Marie

Abstract

Uncertainty impacts the process of health communication. The management and tolerance of uncertainty during healthcare discussions have gained renewed focus due to the growing challenge of obtaining and delivering complex health information, and the offer of health services in diverse contexts. Prenatal genetic counseling (GC) provides education, support and testing options for patients and couples facing a genetic or congenital diagnosis or risk during pregnancy. Gathering detailed and accurate family history information is essential to determine a patient's genetic risk. In South Africa, contextual factors such as patient literacy, language diversity, limited written patient health records, and a lack of familiarity with GC services may increase the potential for misunderstandings during GC consultations. This study uses a qualitative sociolinguistic approach to analyse 9 video-recorded South African prenatal GC consultations to understand the impact of uncertainty on the process of gathering family history information. The findings reveal uncertainty is introduced in different ways during family history taking. This includes when patients have no knowledge about their family history; when they have some knowledge but the details are unclear; or when patients have knowledge but the details are confusing. Uncertainty can lead to interactional trouble in the form of knowledge asymmetries, interrogative questioning, reversals in epistemic authority, and the potential for mistrust. Suggestions are made for how genetic specialists can manage uncertainty in GC family history taking. These include recognizing contextual sources of uncertainty, understanding how patients may respond to uncertainty and being aware of personal responses to moments of discomfort. Specific communication training recommendations and video-based sociolinguistic methods to enhance reflection and communication practice are highlighted. These approaches may enhance the effectiveness of GC communication and strengthen patient-specialist relationships, especially in diverse settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott, Megan & Watermeyer, Jennifer & Wessels, Tina-Marie, 2024. "“We are just not sure what that means or if it's relevant”: Uncertainty when gathering family history information in South African prenatal genetic counseling consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:342:y:2024:i:c:s0277953623009127
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953623009127
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116555?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul K. J. Han & William M. P. Klein & Neeraj K. Arora, 2011. "Varieties of Uncertainty in Health Care," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 31(6), pages 828-838, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helmut Herwartz & Christoph Strumann, 2024. "Too many cooks could spoil the broth: choice overload and the provision of ambulatory health care," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 357-373, September.
    2. Javier Urquizo & Carlos Calderón & Philip James, 2017. "Using a Local Framework Combining Principal Component Regression and Monte Carlo Simulation for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of a Domestic Energy Model in Sub-City Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Robin Gregory & Ralph L. Keeney, 2017. "A Practical Approach to Address Uncertainty in Stakeholder Deliberations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 487-501, March.
    4. Embuldeniya, Gayathri & Gutberg, Jennifer & Sibbald, Shannon S. & Wodchis, Walter P., 2021. "The beginnings of health system transformation: How Ontario Health Teams are implementing change in the context of uncertainty," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(12), pages 1543-1549.
    5. Fereshteh Ghahramani & Jingguo Wang, 2020. "Impact of Smartphones on Quality of Life: A Health Information Behavior Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1275-1290, December.
    6. Basile, L.J. & Carbonara, N. & Panniello, U. & Pellegrino, R., 2024. "The role of big data analytics in improving the quality of healthcare services in the Italian context: The mediating role of risk management," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Merluzzi, Thomas V. & Salamanca-Balen, Natalia & Philip, Errol J. & Salsman, John M., 2023. "“Letting go” - Relinquishing control of illness outcomes to God and quality of life: Meaning/peace as a mediating mechanism in religious coping with cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    8. repec:cup:judgdm:v:17:y:2022:i:4:p:849-882 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Scherr, Courtney L. & Getachew-Smith, Hannah J. & Sudec, Laura & Brooks, John J. & Roberts, Megan, 2020. "Parents’ sensemaking processes in the identification of developmental delays and engagement with early intervention services," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    10. Matt Andrews, 2022. "Getting Real about Unknowns in Complex Policy Work," CID Working Papers 406, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    11. Stephen Wood & George Michaelides & Kevin Daniels & Karen Niven, 2022. "Uncertainty and Well-Being amongst Homeworkers in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study of University Staff," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Xavier Romão & Esmeralda Paupério, 2016. "A framework to assess quality and uncertainty in disaster loss data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(2), pages 1077-1102, September.
    13. repec:jdm:journl:v:17:y:2022:i:4:p:849-882 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Lise Saffran & Sisi Hu & Amanda Hinnant & Laura D Scherer & Susan C Nagel, 2020. "Constructing and influencing perceived authenticity in science communication: Experimenting with narrative," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Costa, Nathalia & Mescouto, Karime & Dillon, Miriam & Olson, Rebecca & Butler, Prudence & Forbes, Roma & Setchell, Jenny, 2022. "The ubiquity of uncertainty in low back pain care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    16. Hillen, Marij A. & Gutheil, Caitlin M. & Strout, Tania D. & Smets, Ellen M.A. & Han, Paul K.J., 2017. "Tolerance of uncertainty: Conceptual analysis, integrative model, and implications for healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 62-75.
    17. Rouven Edgar Haschka & Katharina Schley & Helmut Herwartz, 2020. "Provision of health care services and regional diversity in Germany: insights from a Bayesian health frontier analysis with spatial dependencies," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(1), pages 55-71, February.
    18. Dean, Marleah, 2016. "“It’s not if I get cancer, it’s when I get cancer”: BRCA-positive patients’ (un)certain health experiences regarding hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 21-27.
    19. Per Magnus Mæhle & Ingrid Kristine Small Hanto & Victoria Charlotte Simensen & Sigbjørn Smeland, 2021. "Mind the Differences: How Diagnoses and Hospital Characteristics Influence Coordination in Cancer Patient Pathways," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-25, August.
    20. Maria Therese Jensen & Olaug Øygarden & Aslaug Mikkelsen & Espen Olsen, 2022. "Competence Development and Collaborative Climate as Antecedents of Job Performance, Job Commitment and Uncertainty: Validation of a Theoretical Model across Four Hospitals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, December.
    21. Iles, Irina A. & Gillman, Arielle S. & O'Connor, Lauren E. & Ferrer, Rebecca A. & Klein, William M.P., 2022. "Understanding responses to different types of conflicting information about cancer prevention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    22. Anne Brédart & Amélie Anota & Julia Dick & Violetta Kuboth & Olivier Lareyre & Antoine De Pauw & Alejandra Cano & Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet & Rita Schmutzler & Sylvie Dolbeault & Jean-Luc Kop, 2018. "Patient-Centered Care in Breast Cancer Genetic Clinics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:342:y:2024:i:c:s0277953623009127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.