IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v303y2022ics027795362200260x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Direct-to-consumer detection of atrial fibrillation in a smartwatch electrocardiogram: Medical overuse, medicalisation and the experience of consumers

Author

Listed:
  • Shih, Patti
  • Prokopovich, Kathleen
  • Degeling, Chris
  • Street, Jacqueline
  • Carter, Stacy M.

Abstract

The Apple Watch Electrocardiogram (ECG) is a digital feature that detects signs of atrial fibrillation (AFib), a heart arrhythmia that can lead to stroke. Unlike AFib detection offered in a clinical setting to patients or those at higher risk, the Apple Watch ECG is a direct-to-consumer (DTC) product marketed to the healthy as a self-performed medical test. The feature is incorporated in the design as one of many applications in a multifunctional smartwatch. The Apple Watch ECG signals the movement of consumer wearables into the domain of medical devices, and the highly contested practice of AFib screening. This article examines how this technology produces new avenues for medical overuse among people who are unlikely to gain clinical benefit, and who as active consumers become medicalised via taking part in disease-specific monitoring. Interviews with Apple Watch ECG consumers suggest their strongly trust in the Apple brand is amplified by the promissory quality of screening and technical innovation. What would otherwise be a costly clinical procedure is condensed into an accessible function in a wearable device. Consequently, AFib screening loses its clinical purpose, and is instead refashioned into a component of healthy lifestyle behaviour. Repeat self-screening becomes ‘bundled’ with similar health monitoring practices routinised in consumer wearables. Active uptake supports a market for the product and adds to the reputation of the Apple brand such that consumers become complicit in legitimising a medical practice that has limited clinical justification.

Suggested Citation

  • Shih, Patti & Prokopovich, Kathleen & Degeling, Chris & Street, Jacqueline & Carter, Stacy M., 2022. "Direct-to-consumer detection of atrial fibrillation in a smartwatch electrocardiogram: Medical overuse, medicalisation and the experience of consumers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:303:y:2022:i:c:s027795362200260x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362200260X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114954?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deborah Lupton, 2014. "Apps as Artefacts: Towards a Critical Perspective on Mobile Health and Medical Apps," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Rozbroj, Tomas & Haas, Romi & O'Connor, Denise & Carter, Stacy M. & McCaffery, Kirsten & Thomas, Rae & Donovan, Jan & Buchbinder, Rachelle, 2021. "How do people understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? Systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    3. Childerhose, Janet E. & MacDonald, Margaret E., 2013. "Health consumption as work: The home pregnancy test as a domesticated health tool," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-8.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lupton, Deborah & Jutel, Annemarie, 2015. "‘It's like having a physician in your pocket!’ A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 128-135.
    2. Aksel Tjora & Lisbeth Elvira Levang Løvik & Frank Hauboff Hansen & Marianne Skaar, 2021. "Shameful Technological Impertinence: Consumer Ambivalence among iPad Early-Buyers," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Simone Fullagar & Emma Rich & Jessica Francombe-Webb, 2017. "New Kinds of (Ab)normal?: Public Pedagogies, Affect, and Youth Mental Health in the Digital Age," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Margaret Machniak Sommervold & Maja Van der Velden, 2017. "Visions of Illness, Disease, and Sickness in Mobile Health Applications," Societies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Yaltafit Abror Jeem & Russy Novita Andriani & Refa Nabila & Dwi Ditha Emelia & Lutfan Lazuardi & Hari Koesnanto, 2022. "The Use of Mobile Health Interventions for Outcomes among Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Prediabetes: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-33, October.
    6. MacKinnon, Kinnon R. & Mykhalovskiy, Eric & Worthington, Catherine & Gómez-Ramírez, Oralia & Gilbert, Mark & Grace, Daniel, 2021. "Pay to skip the line: The political economy of digital testing services for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    7. Petrakaki, Dimitra & Hilberg, Eva & Waring, Justin, 2018. "Between empowerment and self-discipline: Governing patients' conduct through technological self-care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 146-153.
    8. Simone Fullagar & Emma Rich & Jessica Francombe-Webb & Antonio Maturo, 2017. "Digital Ecologies of Youth Mental Health: Apps, Therapeutic Publics and Pedagogy as Affective Arrangements," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:303:y:2022:i:c:s027795362200260x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.