Conceptualizing culture in (global) mental health: Lessons from an urban American Indian behavioral health clinic

The movement for global mental health (GMH) has brought perennial questions about human diversity in mental health to the fore through heightened debates over if and how established knowledge, institutions, and practices should be altered for ethical and effective interventions with diverse peoples around the world. Kirmayer and Pedersen (2014) encouraged dialogue between GMH scholars and communities considered for intervention to address differences and concerns about colonialism. American Indian mental health offers an instructive site for global mental health inquiry to understand frameworks that might facilitate this desired dialogue. Here, we draw from a clinical ethnography in urban American Indian behavioral health conducted between September 2014 and February 2015 to glean insights into a popular response to these differences: Incorporating Indigenous cultural forms into clinical practice. Our findings highlight a predicament this response presents to mental health professionals. They can either eschew their clinical training and its cultural assumptions to take up new lives enabling their representation of Indigenous cultural forms, or they can hold onto their professional training and modify what is clinically familiar to appear culturally different. Rather than a purposeful decision, in the clinic contextual factors—tacit assumptions, clinic structures, and popular culture concepts—powerfully shaped clinical practice and reconfigured Indigenous cultural forms to support familiar clinical processes (e.g., treatment-planning). Although potentially therapeutic, culturally repackaged mental health practices are not the therapeutic alternatives called for by many Indigenous communities, and when advertised as such, risk harmful appropriations and misleading reticent people into participating in culturally prescriptive interventions. Lessons for global mental health point away from incorporating Indigenous cultural forms into clinical practice, which is likely to result in cultural repackaging, toward ethnographically-informed dialogue of differences to inform models for medical and epistemic pluralism providing interested communities more culturally commensurate mental health services alongside well-supported Indigenous therapeutic alternatives.