IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v298y2022ics0277953622001836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The devolution of eugenic practices: Sexual and reproductive health and oppression of people with intellectual disability

Author

Listed:
  • McConnell, David
  • Phelan, Shanon

Abstract

Early 20th century eugenicists propagated a system of ideas, values and dispositions that constituted adults with intellectual disability as the antithesis of the paradigmatic citizen, and a biological threat to society. The eugenic schema was encoded in sex-segregated institutionalization and, in many places, forced sterilization. These eugenic practices are no longer sanctioned. However, eugenic practices did not disappear. In this paper we argue that the eugenic schema is now encoded and purveyed through a multiplicity of social arrangements and practices that deny adults with intellectual disability the respect, opportunity and means necessary to participate on a par with others in social life. Such practices include, for example, covert or coerced contraception, and discriminatory child welfare interventions leading to high rates of custody deprivation. Drawing on relational theory, we problematize normative assumptions of embodiment and citizenship, which give rise to attributions of incapacity, and argue that adults with intellectual disability need what all other adults need to make and effect choices concerning their sexuality, relationships and parenthood, i.e., recognition, opportunity and support.

Suggested Citation

  • McConnell, David & Phelan, Shanon, 2022. "The devolution of eugenic practices: Sexual and reproductive health and oppression of people with intellectual disability," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:298:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622001836
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953622001836
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114877?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheena Sullivan & Linda Slack-Smith & Rafat Hussain, 2004. "Understanding the use of breast cancer screening services by women with intellectual disabilities," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 49(6), pages 398-405, December.
    2. Martha Nussbaum, 2011. "Capabilities, Entitlements, Rights: Supplementation and Critique," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 23-37.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tommie Forslund & Lene Lindberg & Pehr Granqvist, 2022. "Behavior Problems among Children of Mothers with Mild Intellectual Disability: The Role of Maternal Sensitivity, Trauma History, and Intelligence," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-13, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yayew Genet Chekol, 2019. "Absence of Political Security in Ethiopian and Its Consequences on State Security," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 75(3), pages 323-333, September.
    2. Canton, César G., 2012. "Empowering People in the Business Frontline: The Ruggie’s Framework and the Capability Approach," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 23(2), pages 191-216.
    3. Ulriksen, Marianne S. & Plagerson, Sophie, 2014. "Social Protection: Rethinking Rights and Duties," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 755-765.
    4. César González-Cantón & Sonia Boulos & Pablo Sánchez-Garrido, 2019. "Exploring the Link Between Human Rights, the Capability Approach and Corporate Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 865-879, December.
    5. Yuka Fujimoto & Jasim Uddin, 2022. "Inclusive Leadership for Reduced Inequality: Economic–Social–Economic Cycle of Inclusion," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 563-582, December.
    6. Abdillah, Kiky Kirina & Abdul Manaf, Azima & Awang, Abd Hair, 2022. "Land tenure security for low-income residents' urban livelihoods: A human development approach review of temporary occupation license," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    7. James E. Conable & Joel Newman & Imabong Olsson, 2024. "Understanding the Dynamics of Life Satisfaction in the Swedish Welfare State: A Multifaceted Analysis Integrating Quantitative, Qualitative, and Discourse Approaches," Journal of Social Science Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(1), pages 1-34, June.
    8. Marina Durano & Nicole Bidegain Ponte, 2016. "A Feminist Perspective on the Follow-Up Process for Financing for Development," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 59(1), pages 32-39, June.
    9. Sidra Naeem & Rana Ejaz Ali Khan, 2021. "Fiscal Decentralization and Gender Equality in Developing Economies: Dynamics of Income Groups in Economies and Corruption," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(9), pages 745-761, September.
    10. Ranya S. ElKhayat, 2018. "The Capabilities Approach: A Future Alternative to Neoliberal Higher Education in the MENA Region," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(3), pages 1-36, June.
    11. Paolo Raciti & Paloma Vivaldi Vera, 2019. "A Proposal for Measuring Children Emotional Well-Being within an Anti-Poverty Measure in Italy: Psychometric Characteristics and Comparative Verification of Results," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 12(4), pages 1187-1219, August.
    12. Monica M. Sharif & Farshad Ghodoosi, 2022. "The Ethics of Blockchain in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 1009-1025, July.
    13. Lehwess-Litzmann, René, 2012. "What Does Flexicurity Have to Gain from the Capability-Approach?," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 23(2), pages 119-139.
    14. Burchi, Francesco & De Muro, Pasquale, 2016. "From food availability to nutritional capabilities: Advancing food security analysis," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 10-19.
    15. Morgan, Edward A. & Osborne, Natalie & Mackey, Brendan, 2022. "Evaluating planning without plans: Principles, criteria and indicators for effective forest landscape approaches," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    16. Marta Eichsteller, 2021. "Migration as a Capability: Discussing Sen’s Capability Approach in the Context of International Migration," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 174-181.
    17. Daoud, Adel & Herlitz, Anders & Subramanian, S.V., 2022. "IMF fairness: Calibrating the policies of the International Monetary Fund based on distributive justice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Quentin Farmar-Bowers, 2015. "Finding Ways to Improve Australia’s Food Security Situation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-27, May.
    19. Andrea Vigorito, 2011. "Bibliography on the Capability Approach 2010--2011," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 607-612, November.
    20. Bussière, Clémence & Le Vaillant, Marc & Pelletier-Fleury, Nathalie, 2015. "Screening for cervical cancer: What are the determinants among adults with disabilities living in institutions? Findings from a National Survey in France," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(6), pages 794-801.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:298:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622001836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.