IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v242y2019ics0277953619305842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multidisciplinary meetings at the emergency department: A conversation-analytic study of decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Seuren, Lucas M.
  • Stommel, Wyke
  • van Asselt, Dieneke
  • Sir, Özcan
  • Stommel, Martijn
  • Schoon, Yvonne

Abstract

Multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs) have become an established part of many medical disciplines. Much research has been done to investigate the conditions under which they work best. This research, however, has been mostly retrospective and has had little consideration for the actual workings of MDMs. The aim of this study was to determine how Multidisciplinary Teams (MDTs) come to a shared decision and thus how they organize MDMs moment by moment. For this purpose we recorded twenty MDMs at the Department of Emergency Medicine (ED) of the Radboud University Medical Center in The Netherlands between November 2017 and June 2018. These meetings, contrary to those discussed in the literature, were scheduled ad-hoc as patients were seen at the ED and were conducted by small MDTs of between three and six participants, always involving a surgeon, a geriatrician, and an emergency physician.

Suggested Citation

  • Seuren, Lucas M. & Stommel, Wyke & van Asselt, Dieneke & Sir, Özcan & Stommel, Martijn & Schoon, Yvonne, 2019. "Multidisciplinary meetings at the emergency department: A conversation-analytic study of decision-making," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:242:y:2019:i:c:s0277953619305842
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953619305842
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112589?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marjan Huisman, 2001. "Decision-Making in Meetings as Talk-in-Interaction," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 69-90, September.
    2. Stevenson, Fiona & Pelletier, Caroline & Gibson, William & Park, Sophie & Chrysikou, Vasilki, 2018. "The co-construction of medical disposals in emergency medicine consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 69-81.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacqueline de Bony, 2005. "Dutch decision as rooted in Dutch culture: An ethnologic study of the Dutch decision process," Post-Print halshs-00113147, HAL.
    2. Melisa Stevanovic & Samuel Tuhkanen & Milla Järvensivu & Emmi Koskinen & Camilla Lindholm & Jenny Paananen & Enikö Savander & Taina Valkeapää & Kaisa Valkiaranta, 2022. "Making Food Decisions Together: Physiological and Affective Underpinnings of Relinquishing Preferences and Reaching Decisions," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.
    3. Laura Illia & Stefania Romenti & Belén Rodríguez-Cánovas & Grazia Murtarelli & Craig E. Carroll, 2017. "Exploring Corporations’ Dialogue About CSR in the Digital Era," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 39-58, November.
    4. Pasi Hirvonen, 2016. "Positioning Theory and Small-Group Interaction," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(3), pages 21582440166, July.
    5. Lehtinen, Esa & Pälli, Pekka, 2011. "Conversational use of genres in managerial meetings," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 287-296, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:242:y:2019:i:c:s0277953619305842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.