IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v224y2019icp58-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suffering and response: Directions in empirical research

Author

Listed:
  • VanderWeele, Tyler J.

Abstract

This essay provides a discussion of the current state of, and future possibilities for, empirical research on the topic of suffering. Discussion is given to the concept of suffering itself; existing empirical measures are reviewed and critiqued and a new multi-item measure of suffering, for use in both clinical and non-clinical populations, is put forward. The existing empirical research on suffering is briefly reviewed with considerable discussion given to potential future research directions on understanding the distribution and determinants of suffering, potential responses to suffering and their effectiveness, and the role of caregiving in the alleviation of suffering.

Suggested Citation

  • VanderWeele, Tyler J., 2019. "Suffering and response: Directions in empirical research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 58-66.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:224:y:2019:i:c:p:58-66
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953619300413
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joan K. Monin & Becca R. Levy & Heidi S. Kane, 2017. "To Love is to Suffer: Older Adults’ Daily Emotional Contagion to Perceived Spousal Suffering," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(3), pages 383-387.
    2. VanderWeele, T.J., 2018. "Is Forgiveness a Public Health Issue?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 108(2), pages 189-190.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristopher J. Tietsort & Sarah J. Tracy & Elissa A. Adame, 2023. "“You Just Don’t Talk about Certain Topics”: How Concerns to Disclose Suffering to Leaders Constrain Compassion at Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Carmen Sánchez-Guardiola Paredes & Eva María Aguaded Ramírez & Clemente Rodríguez-Sabiote, 2021. "Content Validation of a Semi-Structured Interview to Analyze the Management of Suffering," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Tim Lomas & Tyler J. VanderWeele, 2022. "The Garden and the Orchestra: Generative Metaphors for Conceptualizing the Complexities of Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brendan Case & Tyler J. VanderWeele, 2024. "Integrating the humanities and the social sciences: six approaches and case studies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Svetlana Kravchuk, 2021. "The Relationship between Psychological Resilience and Tendency to Forgiveness," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 10, January.
    3. Svetlana Kravchuk, 2021. "Willingness to Forgive Oneself and Others as a Way of Personal Growth of University Students," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 13(3), pages 262-279, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:224:y:2019:i:c:p:58-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.