IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4628-d1088238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“You Just Don’t Talk about Certain Topics”: How Concerns to Disclose Suffering to Leaders Constrain Compassion at Work

Author

Listed:
  • Cristopher J. Tietsort

    (Department of Communication Studies, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA)

  • Sarah J. Tracy

    (Hugh Downs School of Human Communication, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

  • Elissa A. Adame

    (Hugh Downs School of Human Communication, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

Abstract

Employee and organizational sustainability are threatened by widespread stress, burnout, and mental health challenges, among other life events. Compassion at work may create more sustainable organizations by alleviating this suffering, but scholars remain puzzled as to why compassion often fails to unfold within organizations. One potential explanation is that suffering employees feel uncertain in expressing suffering at work. To date, however, relatively little research has examined the perspective of suffering employees and the potential hesitation to express suffering due to organizational norms, power dynamics with leaders, and other influences. This study seeks to expand our understanding of compassion by examining how suffering employees make sense of compassionate interactions with leaders, and the concerns they have disclosing and discussing suffering at work. Utilizing qualitative, semi-structured interviews, we found that suffering employees have four driving concerns, which constrain the discussion of suffering at work: (1) professionalism and the appropriateness of suffering, (2) the validity of one’s suffering, (3) the collective impact of a compassionate response, and (4) image management. These concerns, while at times isolated, were often layered for employees in ways that compounded the challenge of disclosing suffering and openly engaging with leaders across the compassion process. We analyze these driving concerns, linking them to prior research and illustrating how these concerns limit employees ability to receive compassion and, in some cases, exacerbate their suffering. Practical implications are discussed as well, outlining ways that organizations can shape compassion processes toward greater employee sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristopher J. Tietsort & Sarah J. Tracy & Elissa A. Adame, 2023. "“You Just Don’t Talk about Certain Topics”: How Concerns to Disclose Suffering to Leaders Constrain Compassion at Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4628-:d:1088238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4628/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4628/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. VanderWeele, Tyler J., 2019. "Suffering and response: Directions in empirical research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 58-66.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carmen Sánchez-Guardiola Paredes & Eva María Aguaded Ramírez & Clemente Rodríguez-Sabiote, 2021. "Content Validation of a Semi-Structured Interview to Analyze the Management of Suffering," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Tim Lomas & Tyler J. VanderWeele, 2022. "The Garden and the Orchestra: Generative Metaphors for Conceptualizing the Complexities of Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4628-:d:1088238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.