IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v200y2018icp73-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving recruitment to clinical trials during pregnancy: A mixed methods investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Strömmer, Sofia
  • Lawrence, Wendy
  • Rose, Taylor
  • Vogel, Christina
  • Watson, Daniella
  • Bottell, Joanne N.
  • Parmenter, Janice
  • Harvey, Nicholas C.
  • Cooper, Cyrus
  • Inskip, Hazel
  • Baird, Janis
  • Barker, Mary

Abstract

To identify reasons underlying women's refusal to participate in a pregnancy trial and to identify ways of increasing recruitment.

Suggested Citation

  • Strömmer, Sofia & Lawrence, Wendy & Rose, Taylor & Vogel, Christina & Watson, Daniella & Bottell, Joanne N. & Parmenter, Janice & Harvey, Nicholas C. & Cooper, Cyrus & Inskip, Hazel & Baird, Janis & B, 2018. "Improving recruitment to clinical trials during pregnancy: A mixed methods investigation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 73-82.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:200:y:2018:i:c:p:73-82
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953618300145
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raisa B Gul & Parveen A Ali, 2010. "Clinical trials: the challenge of recruitment and retention of participants," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1‐2), pages 227-233, January.
    2. Kim, Peter H. & Dirks, Kurt T. & Cooper, Cecily D. & Ferrin, Donald L., 2006. "When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 49-65, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gooding, Kate & Phiri, Mackwellings & Peterson, Ingrid & Parker, Michael & Desmond, Nicola, 2018. "Six dimensions of research trial acceptability: how much, what, when, in what circumstances, to whom and why?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 190-198.
    2. Elena Marbán-Castro & Clara Pons-Duran & Laura García-Otero & Haily Chen & Luis Bernardo Herrera & María del Mar Gil & Anna Goncé & Elena Ferriols-Pérez & Miguel Ángel Rodríguez & Paloma Toro & Azucen, 2021. "Acceptability of Clinical Trials on COVID-19 during Pregnancy among Pregnant Women and Healthcare Providers: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-14, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dutta, Sujay & Pullig, Chris, 2011. "Effectiveness of corporate responses to brand crises: The role of crisis type and response strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(12), pages 1281-1287.
    2. Brühl, Rolf & Basel, Jörn S. & Kury, Max F., 2018. "Communication after an integrity-based trust violation: How organizational account giving affects trust," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 161-170.
    3. Sue-Chan, Christina & Au, Al K.C. & Hackett, Rick D., 2012. "Trust as a mediator of the relationship between leader/member behavior and leader-member-exchange quality," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 459-468.
    4. AERTS, Walter & TARCA, Ann, 2008. "The effect of institutional setting on attributional content in management commentary reports," Working Papers 2008010, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    5. Tracy, Elizabeth M. & Billingsley, Joseph & Pollack, Jeffrey M. & Barber, Dennis & Beorchia, Ace & Carr, Jon C. & Gonzalez, Gabe & Harris, Michael L. & Michaelis, Timothy L. & Morrow, Grayson & Philli, 2021. "A behavioral insights approach to recruiting entrepreneurs for an academic study during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    6. Alyson Byrne & Julian Barling & Kathryne Dupré, 2014. "Leader Apologies and Employee and Leader Well-Being," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(1), pages 91-106, April.
    7. Bob Fennis & Wolfgang Stroebe, 2014. "Softening the Blow: Company Self-Disclosure of Negative Information Lessens Damaging Effects on Consumer Judgment and Decision Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 109-120, March.
    8. Kähkönen, T. & Blomqvist, K. & Gillespie, N. & Vanhala, M., 2021. "Employee trust repair: A systematic review of 20 years of empirical research and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 98-109.
    9. Pollack, Jeffrey M. & Bosse, Douglas A., 2014. "When do investors forgive entrepreneurs for lying?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 741-754.
    10. Sophie Mölders & Prisca Brosi & Matthias Spörrle & Isabell M. Welpe, 2019. "The Effect of Top Management Trustworthiness on Turnover Intentions via Negative Emotions: The Moderating Role of Gender," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 957-969, June.
    11. Haiying Wei & Yaxuan Ran, 2019. "Male Versus Female: How the Gender of Apologizers Influences Consumer Forgiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 371-387, January.
    12. Leunissen, Joost M. & Cremer, David De & Reinders Folmer, Christopher P., 2012. "An instrumental perspective on apologizing in bargaining: The importance of forgiveness to apologize," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 215-222.
    13. Maurice E. Schweitzer & Teck-Hua Ho & Xing Zhang, 2018. "How Monitoring Influences Trust: A Tale of Two Faces," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 253-270, January.
    14. Manuela Peters & Tiara Ratz & Frauke Wichmann & Sonia Lippke & Claudia Voelcker-Rehage & Claudia R. Pischke, 2022. "Ecological Predictors of Older Adults’ Participation and Retention in a Physical Activity Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-25, March.
    15. Anne Joosten & Marius Dijke & Alain Hiel & David Cremer, 2014. "Feel Good, Do-Good!? On Consistency and Compensation in Moral Self-Regulation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 71-84, August.
    16. Susanna Gallani & Ranjani Krishnan & Eric J. Marinich & Michael D. Shields, 2019. "Budgeting, Psychological Contracts, and Budgetary Misreporting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2924-2945, June.
    17. Michael Pirson & Deepak Malhotra, 2011. "Foundations of Organizational Trust: What Matters to Different Stakeholders?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 1087-1104, August.
    18. Pizzi, Gabriele & Scarpi, Daniele, 2013. "When Out-of-Stock Products DO Backfire: Managing Disclosure Time and Justification Wording," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 352-359.
    19. Anna M. Cianci & Shana M. Clor-Proell & Steven E. Kaplan, 2019. "How Do Investors Respond to Restatements? Repairing Trust Through Managerial Reputation and the Announcement of Corrective Actions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 297-312, August.
    20. Kim, Peter H. & Cooper, Cecily D. & Dirks, Kurt T. & Ferrin, Donald L., 2013. "Repairing trust with individuals vs. groups," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 1-14.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:200:y:2018:i:c:p:73-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.