IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v176y2017icp25-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualisation of the ‘good’ self-manager: A qualitative investigation of stakeholder views on the self-management of long-term health conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Ellis, J.
  • Boger, E.
  • Latter, S.
  • Kennedy, A.
  • Jones, F.
  • Foster, C.
  • Demain, S.

Abstract

Healthcare policy in developed countries has, in recent years, promoted self-management among people with long-term conditions. Such policies are underpinned by neoliberal philosophy, as seen in the promotion of greater individual responsibility for health through increased support for self-management. Yet still little is known about how self-management is understood by commissioners of healthcare services, healthcare professionals, people with long-term conditions and family care-givers. The evidence presented here is drawn from a two-year study, which investigated how self-management is conceptualised by these stakeholder groups. Conducted in the UK between 2013 and 2015, this study focused on three exemplar long-term conditions, stroke, diabetes and colorectal cancer, to explore the issue. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were carried out with 174 participants (97 patients, 35 family care-givers, 20 healthcare professionals and 22 commissioners). The data is used to demonstrate how self-management is framed in terms of what it means to be a ‘good’ self-manager. The ‘good’ self-manager is an individual who is remoralised; thus taking responsibility for their health; is knowledgeable and uses this to manage risks; and, is ‘active’ in using information to make informed decisions regarding health and social wellbeing. This paper examines the conceptualisation of the ‘good’ self-manager. It demonstrates how the remoralised, knowledgeable and active elements are inextricably linked, that is, how action is knowledge applied and how morality underlies all action of the ‘good’ self-manager. Through unpicking the ‘good’ self-manager the problems of neoliberalism are also revealed and addressed here.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellis, J. & Boger, E. & Latter, S. & Kennedy, A. & Jones, F. & Foster, C. & Demain, S., 2017. "Conceptualisation of the ‘good’ self-manager: A qualitative investigation of stakeholder views on the self-management of long-term health conditions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 25-33.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:176:y:2017:i:c:p:25-33
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953617300254
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Campbell, Rona & Pound, Pandora & Pope, Catherine & Britten, Nicky & Pill, Roisin & Morgan, Myfanwy & Donovan, Jenny, 2003. "Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 671-684, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Troels Kristensen & Kim Rose-Olsen & Christian Volmar Skovsgaard, 2020. "Effects of Point-Of-Care Testing in General Practice for Type 2 Diabetes Patients on Ambulatory Visits and Hospitalizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Simon Fletcher & Stefan Tino Kulnik & Sara Demain & Fiona Jones, 2019. "The problem with self-management: Problematising self-management and power using a Foucauldian lens in the context of stroke care and rehabilitation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Xie, Julan & Zhou, Dinggen & Tan, Yuxuan, 2021. "Relationship between mindfulness and general health among couples in Mainland China: A crossover perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    4. Felicity Thomas & Lorraine Hansford & Joseph Ford & Katrina Wyatt & Rosemarie McCabe & Richard Byng, 2018. "Moral narratives and mental health: rethinking understandings of distress and healthcare support in contexts of austerity and welfare reform," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Josefien van Olmen, 2022. "The Promise of Digital Self-Management: A Reflection about the Effects of Patient-Targeted e-Health Tools on Self-Management and Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-9, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maya Maor & Moflah Ataika & Pesach Shvartzman & Maya Lavie Ajayi, 2021. "“I Had to Rediscover Our Healthy Food”: An Indigenous Perspective on Coping with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Rebecca J Bartlett Ellis & Janet L Welch, 2017. "Medication‐taking behaviours in chronic kidney disease with multiple chronic conditions: a meta‐ethnographic synthesis of qualitative studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5-6), pages 586-598, March.
    3. Yu‐Ting Chang & Mark Hayter & Shu‐Chen Wu, 2010. "A systematic review and meta‐ethnography of the qualitative literature: experiences of the menarche," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3‐4), pages 447-460, February.
    4. Eleri Jones & Ernestina Coast, 2013. "Social relationships and postpartum depression in South Asia: A systematic review," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(7), pages 690-700, November.
    5. Hansen, Henrik & Trifkovic, Neda, 2013. "Systematic Reviews: Questions, Methods and Usage," MPRA Paper 47993, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Best, Paul & Manktelow, Roger & Taylor, Brian, 2014. "Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 27-36.
    7. Oya, Carlos & Schaefer, Florian & Skalidou, Dafni, 2018. "The effectiveness of agricultural certification in developing countries: A systematic review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 282-312.
    8. Shisei Tei & Junya Fujino, 2022. "Social ties, fears and bias during the COVID-19 pandemic: Fragile and flexible mindsets," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    9. Khan, Imran & Kabir, Zobaidul, 2020. "Waste-to-energy generation technologies and the developing economies: A multi-criteria analysis for sustainability assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 320-333.
    10. Carles Campanyà & David Fonseca & Daniel Amo & Núria Martí & Enric Peña, 2021. "Mixed Analysis of the Flipped Classroom in the Concrete and Steel Structures Subject in the Context of COVID-19 Crisis Outbreak. A Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Helle Feddersen & Tine Mechlenborg Kristiansen & Pernille Tanggaard Andersen & Kim Hørslev‐Petersen & Jette Primdahl, 2017. "Construction of meaningful identities in the context of rheumatoid arthritis, motherhood and paid work: A meta‐ethnography," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4117-4128, December.
    12. McNeil, Ryan & Small, Will, 2014. "‘Safer environment interventions’: A qualitative synthesis of the experiences and perceptions of people who inject drugs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 151-158.
    13. Hansen, Ulla Møller & Cleal, Bryan & Willaing, Ingrid & Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Tine, 2018. "Managing type 1 diabetes in the context of work life: A matter of containment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 70-77.
    14. Skinner, Mark W. & Yantzi, Nicole M. & Rosenberg, Mark W., 2009. "Neither rain nor hail nor sleet nor snow: Provider perspectives on the challenges of weather for home and community care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 682-688, February.
    15. Marion Haas & Sandy Fowler, 2006. "A synthesis of qualitative research on cervical cancer screening behaviour: Women?s perceptions of the barriers and motivators to screen and the implications for policy and practice, CHERE Working Pap," Working Papers 2006/7, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney.
    16. Lambert, Helen, 2006. "Accounting for EBM: Notions of evidence in medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 2633-2645, June.
    17. Crovini, Chiara & Ossola, Giovanni & Britzelmaier, Bernd, 2021. "How to reconsider risk management in SMEs? An Advanced, Reasoned and Organised Literature Review," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 118-134.
    18. Reid, Bernie & Sinclair, Marlene & Barr, Owen & Dobbs, Frank & Crealey, Grainne, 2009. "A meta-synthesis of pregnant women's decision-making processes with regard to antenatal screening for Down syndrome," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 1561-1573, December.
    19. Al-Janabi, Hareth & Coast, Joanna & Flynn, Terry N., 2008. "What do people value when they provide unpaid care for an older person? A meta-ethnography with interview follow-up," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 111-121, July.
    20. Beatriz de Souza Mello Gonçalves & Flávio Leonel de Carvalho & Paula de Camargo Fiorini, 2022. "Circular Economy and Financial Aspects: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-41, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:176:y:2017:i:c:p:25-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.