IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v92y2024ics0038012124000120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robustness analysis for imprecise additive value efficiency analysis with an application to evaluation of special economic zones in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Labijak-Kowalska, Anna
  • Kadziński, Miłosz
  • Dias, Luis C.

Abstract

We introduce an algorithmic framework for investigating the robustness of efficiency analysis results in the presence of imprecise information about data and preferences. We employ an additive value efficiency model accepting ordinal and interval information about the performances of Decision Making Units and imprecision in the specification of input and output weights and the shapes of marginal value functions. We verify the stability of efficiency measures using a combination of mathematical programming and Monte Carlo simulations. The results capture various certainty levels, emphasizing the necessary, possible, extreme, and expected outcomes and the distribution of outcomes in the space of feasible weights, performances, and marginal functions. The practical usefulness of the proposed framework is demonstrated in a real-world problem concerning the functioning of Special Economic Zones in Poland. We discuss results that increase the discrimination power, indicate overall good performances, and provide hints on the required improvements.

Suggested Citation

  • Labijak-Kowalska, Anna & Kadziński, Miłosz & Dias, Luis C., 2024. "Robustness analysis for imprecise additive value efficiency analysis with an application to evaluation of special economic zones in Poland," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124000120
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2024.101813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012124000120
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2024.101813?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi & G. R. Jahanshahloo & M. Khodabakhshi & M. Rostamy-Malkhlifeh & Z. Moghaddas & M. Vaez-Ghasemi, 2013. "A Review of Ranking Models in Data Envelopment Analysis," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-20, July.
    2. Pereira, Miguel Alves & Figueira, José Rui & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2020. "Using a Choquet integral-based approach for incorporating decision-maker’s preference judgments in a Data Envelopment Analysis model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 1016-1030.
    3. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    4. M C Gouveia & L C Dias & C H Antunes, 2008. "Additive DEA based on MCDA with imprecise information," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(1), pages 54-63, January.
    5. Anna Labijak-Kowalska & Miłosz Kadziński, 2023. "Exact and stochastic methods for robustness analysis in the context of Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-34, March.
    6. R. Allen & A. Athanassopoulos & R.G. Dyson & E. Thanassoulis, 1997. "Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 73(0), pages 13-34, October.
    7. Zhu, Joe, 2003. "Imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA): A review and improvement with an application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(3), pages 513-529, February.
    8. Lahdelma, Risto & Salminen, Pekka, 2006. "Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis using the data envelopment model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(1), pages 241-252, April.
    9. Ahti Salo & Antti Punkka, 2011. "Ranking Intervals and Dominance Relations for Ratio-Based Efficiency Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 200-214, January.
    10. Tarja Joro & Pekka J. Korhonen, 2015. "Extension of Data Envelopment Analysis with Preference Information," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4899-7528-7, December.
    11. M C Gouveia & L C Dias & C H Antunes, 2013. "Super-efficiency and stability intervals in additive DEA," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(1), pages 86-96, January.
    12. Salo, Ahti A. & Hamalainen, Raimo P., 1995. "Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 458-475, May.
    13. Cook, Wade D. & Zhu, Joe, 2007. "Classifying inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(2), pages 692-699, July.
    14. P N de Almeida & L C Dias, 2012. "Value-based DEA models: application-driven developments," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 63(1), pages 16-27, January.
    15. Merja Halme & Tarja Joro & Pekka Korhonen & Seppo Salo & Jyrki Wallenius, 1999. "A Value Efficiency Approach to Incorporating Preference Information in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 103-115, January.
    16. Kadziński, Miłosz & Tervonen, Tommi, 2013. "Robust multi-criteria ranking with additive value models and holistic pair-wise preference statements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 169-180.
    17. Kadziński, MiŁosz & Greco, Salvatore & SŁowiński, Roman, 2012. "Extreme ranking analysis in robust ordinal regression," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 488-501.
    18. Kadziński, Miłosz & Labijak, Anna & Napieraj, Małgorzata, 2017. "Integrated framework for robustness analysis using ratio-based efficiency model with application to evaluation of Polish airports," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1-18.
    19. Pereira, André Alves & Pereira, Miguel Alves, 2023. "Energy storage strategy analysis based on the Choquet multi-criteria preference aggregation model: The Portuguese case," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    20. Petrović, Marijana & Bojković, Nataša & Stamenković, Mladen & Anić, Ivan, 2018. "Supporting performance appraisal in ELECTRE based stepwise benchmarking model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 237-251.
    21. Risto Lahdelma & Pekka Salminen, 2001. "SMAA-2: Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis for Group Decision Making," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 444-454, June.
    22. Kadziński, Miłosz & Stamenković, Mladen & Uniejewski, Maciej, 2022. "Stepwise benchmarking for multiple criteria sorting," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    23. Fernández, Eduardo & Figueira, José Rui & Navarro, Jorge & Solares, Efrain, 2022. "Handling imperfect information in multiple criteria decision-making through a comprehensive interval outranking approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    24. Alvarez, Pavel Anselmo & Valdez, Cuitláhuac & Dutta, Bapi, 2022. "Analysis of the innovation capacity of Mexican regions with the multiple criteria hierarchy process," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    25. L C Dias & J N Clímaco, 2000. "Additive aggregation with variable interdependent parameters: the VIP analysis software," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(9), pages 1070-1082, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Labijak-Kowalska & Miłosz Kadziński, 2023. "Exact and stochastic methods for robustness analysis in the context of Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-34, March.
    2. Gouveia, M.C. & Dias, L.C. & Antunes, C.H. & Boucinha, J. & Inácio, C.F., 2015. "Benchmarking of maintenance and outage repair in an electricity distribution company using the value-based DEA method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 104-114.
    3. M. C. Gouveia & L. C. Dias & C. H. Antunes & M. A. Mota & E. M. Duarte & E. M. Tenreiro, 2016. "An application of value-based DEA to identify the best practices in primary health care," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(3), pages 743-767, July.
    4. Santos, Sérgio P. & Belton, Valerie & Howick, Susan & Pilkington, Martin, 2018. "Measuring organisational performance using a mix of OR methods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 18-30.
    5. Kadziński, Miłosz & Labijak, Anna & Napieraj, Małgorzata, 2017. "Integrated framework for robustness analysis using ratio-based efficiency model with application to evaluation of Polish airports," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1-18.
    6. Pereira, Miguel Alves & Camanho, Ana Santos & Figueira, José Rui & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2021. "Incorporating preference information in a range directional composite indicator: The case of Portuguese public hospitals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 633-650.
    7. R. Pelissari & M. C. Oliveira & S. Ben Amor & A. Kandakoglu & A. L. Helleno, 2020. "SMAA methods and their applications: a literature review and future research directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 433-493, October.
    8. Gouveia, M.C. & Henriques, C.O. & Costa, P., 2021. "Evaluating the efficiency of structural funds: An application in the competitiveness of SMEs across different EU beneficiary regions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    9. Pereira, Miguel Alves & Figueira, José Rui & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2020. "Using a Choquet integral-based approach for incorporating decision-maker’s preference judgments in a Data Envelopment Analysis model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 1016-1030.
    10. Liesiö, Juuso & Andelmin, Juho & Salo, Ahti, 2020. "Efficient allocation of resources to a portfolio of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 619-636.
    11. García-Alonso, Carlos R. & Salvador-Carulla, Luis & Fernández-Rodríguez, Vicente, 2015. "Evaluation of system efficiency using the Monte Carlo DEA: The case of small health areasAuthor-Name: Torres-Jiménez, Mercedes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 525-535.
    12. Cook, Wade D. & Seiford, Larry M., 2009. "Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Henriques, C.O. & Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O.D., 2021. "Efficiency of secondary schools in Portugal: A novel DEA hybrid approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Chen, Chien-Ming & Li, Dan, 2024. "Weighing in on the average weights: Measuring corporate social performance (CSP) score using DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    15. Henriques, C.O. & Chavez, J.M. & Gouveia, M.C. & Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O.D., 2022. "Efficiency of secondary schools in Ecuador: A value based DEA approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    16. Vetschera, Rudolf, 2017. "Deriving rankings from incomplete preference information: A comparison of different approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 244-253.
    17. Ahti Salo & Antti Punkka, 2011. "Ranking Intervals and Dominance Relations for Ratio-Based Efficiency Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 200-214, January.
    18. Ciomek, Krzysztof & Ferretti, Valentina & Kadzinski, Milosz, 2018. "Predictive analytics and disused railways requalification: insights from a Post Factum Analysis perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 85922, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Toloo, Mehdi & Ebrahimi, Bohlool & Amin, Gholam R., 2021. "New data envelopment analysis models for classifying flexible measures: The role of non-Archimedean epsilon," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1037-1050.
    20. Corrente, Salvatore & Figueira, José Rui & Greco, Salvatore, 2014. "The SMAA-PROMETHEE method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 514-522.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124000120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.