IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v87y2023ipbs0038012123001155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online doctor-patient dynamic stable matching model based on regret theory under incomplete information

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Meng
  • Wang, Yajun
  • Zhang, Xueyi
  • Xu, Chang

Abstract

With the development of the Internet era, online medical community is increasingly favored by patients and health care workers. How to make a reasonable doctor-patient matching and meet patients' relevant needs through online medical platform is the key to realizing effective allocation of medical resources. This paper proposes an online doctor-patient dynamic stable matching model to deeply investigate the online doctor-patient matching problem under incomplete information. Firstly, we assign the score to each doctor based on the patient's attribute expectations and the doctor's evaluation information. Considering the difficulty of obtaining complete information in real life and different attribute representations, we propose incomplete information filling methods based on collaborative filtering algorithm. To make the filling result more reasonable, we introduce probabilistic linguistic information entropy to process the incomplete information. Secondly, considering psychological behavior, we use regret theory to calculate patients' satisfaction with doctors. Finally, with the definitions of rational matching and stable matching, we propose a doctor-patient dynamic stable matching model. This model can solve the problems like a temporary appointment and private matching and ensure the stability of matching. In addition, the model proposed in this paper considers not only patients' but also the doctors' needs. The case of online doctor-patient matching is based on “haodf.com”, and through comparative analysis can prove the effectiveness and superiority of this method.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Meng & Wang, Yajun & Zhang, Xueyi & Xu, Chang, 2023. "Online doctor-patient dynamic stable matching model based on regret theory under incomplete information," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:87:y:2023:i:pb:s0038012123001155
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012123001155
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101615?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David E. Bell, 1982. "Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 961-981, October.
    2. Ying Yang & Shoucheng Luo & Jing Fan & Xinye Zhou & Chunyu Fu & Guochun Tang, 2019. "Study on specialist outpatient matching appointment and the balance matching model," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 20-39, January.
    3. Xi Chen & Liu Zhao & Haiming Liang & Kin Keung Lai, 2019. "Matching patients and healthcare service providers: a novel two-stage method based on knowledge rules and OWA-NSGA-II algorithm," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 221-247, January.
    4. Karasan, Ali & Erdogan, Melike & Cinar, Melih, 2022. "Healthcare service quality evaluation: An integrated decision-making methodology and a case study," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    5. Seker, Sukran & Kahraman, Cengiz, 2021. "Socio-economic evaluation model for sustainable solar PV panels using a novel integrated MCDM methodology: A case in Turkey," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Xinxin Wang & Zeshui Xu & Qiang Wen & Honghui Li, 2021. "A multidimensional decision with nested probabilistic linguistic term sets and its application in corporate investment," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 3382-3400, January.
    7. Yang Liu & Zhi-Ping Fan & Yan-Ping Jiang, 2018. "Satisfied surgeon–patient matching: a model-based method," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 2871-2891, November.
    8. Yang, Chih-Hao & Hsu, Wei & Wu, Yong-Lin, 2022. "A hybrid multiple-criteria decision portfolio with the resource constraints model of a smart healthcare management system for public medical centers," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Pereira, Miguel Alves & Machete, Inês Freire & Ferreira, Diogo Cunha & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2020. "Using multi-criteria decision analysis to rank European health systems: The Beveridgian financing case," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. Dinh The Luc, 2016. "Multiobjective Linear Programming," Springer Books, Springer, edition 1, number 978-3-319-21091-9, October.
    11. Neyshabouri, Saba & Berg, Bjorn P., 2017. "Two-stage robust optimization approach to elective surgery and downstream capacity planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(1), pages 21-40.
    12. Ying Yang & Bing Shen & Wei Gao & Yong Liu & Liwei Zhong, 2015. "A surgical scheduling method considering surgeons’ preferences," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1016-1026, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pereira, André Alves & Pereira, Miguel Alves, 2023. "Energy storage strategy analysis based on the Choquet multi-criteria preference aggregation model: The Portuguese case," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Sean Harris & David Claudio, 2022. "Current Trends in Operating Room Scheduling 2015 to 2020: a Literature Review," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-42, March.
    3. Xuanzhu Fan & Jiafu Tang & Chongjun Yan & Hainan Guo & Zhongfa Cao, 2021. "Outpatient appointment scheduling problem considering patient selection behavior: data modeling and simulation optimization," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 677-699, November.
    4. Xuanzhu Fan & Jiafu Tang & Chongjun Yan & Hainan Guo & Zhongfa Cao, 0. "Outpatient appointment scheduling problem considering patient selection behavior: data modeling and simulation optimization," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    5. Yoichiro Fujii & Yusuke Osaki, 2018. "Regret-sensitive treatment decisions," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Castro, Luciano de & Galvao, Antonio F. & Kim, Jeong Yeol & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel & Olmo, Jose, 2022. "Experiments on portfolio selection: A comparison between quantile preferences and expected utility decision models," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    7. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2008. "Regret in the Newsvendor Model with Partial Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 188-203, February.
    8. Amos Schurr & Yaakov Kareev & Judith Avrahami & Ilana Ritov, 2012. "Taking the Broad Perspective: Risky Choices in Repeated Proficiency Tasks," Discussion Paper Series dp621, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    9. Jinyi Hu, 2023. "Linguistic Multiple-Attribute Decision Making Based on Regret Theory and Minimax-DEA," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Malavasi, Matteo & Ortobelli Lozza, Sergio & Trück, Stefan, 2021. "Second order of stochastic dominance efficiency vs mean variance efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1192-1206.
    11. Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde, 2017. "How regret moves individual and collective choices towards rationality," Chapters, in: Morris Altman (ed.), Handbook of Behavioural Economics and Smart Decision-Making, chapter 11, pages 188-204, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Martín Egozcue & Xu Guo & Wing-Keung Wong, 2015. "Optimal output for the regret-averse competitive firm under price uncertainty," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 5(2), pages 279-295, December.
    13. Colson, Gérard, 1993. "Prenons-nous assez de risque dans les théories du risque?," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 69(1), pages 111-141, mars.
    14. Jhunjhunwala, Tanushree, 2021. "Searching to avoid regret: An experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 298-319.
    15. van Dijk, Wilco W. & van der Pligt, Joop, 1997. "The Impact of Probability and Magnitude of Outcome on Disappointment and Elation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 277-284, March.
    16. Ming Li & Dipjyoti Majumdar, 2010. "A Psychologically Based Model of Voter Turnout," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 12(5), pages 979-1002, October.
    17. Kobana Abukari & Isaac Otchere, 2020. "Dominance of hybrid contratum strategies over momentum and contrarian strategies: half a century of evidence," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 34(4), pages 471-505, December.
    18. Qin, Jie, 2015. "A model of regret, investor behavior, and market turbulence," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 150-174.
    19. Sugden, Robert & Wang, Mengjie & Zizzo, Daniel John, 2019. "Take it or leave it: Experimental evidence on the effect of time-limited offers on consumer behaviour," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1-23.
    20. J. Behnamian & Z. Gharabaghli, 2023. "Multi-objective outpatient scheduling in health centers considering resource constraints and service quality: a robust optimization approach," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 1-35, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:87:y:2023:i:pb:s0038012123001155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.