IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v86y2023ics0038012122002701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of rain gauge networks—A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • de Oliveira Simoyama, Felipe
  • Croope, Silvana
  • de Salles Neto, Luiz Leduino
  • Santos, Leonardo Bacelar Lima

Abstract

Rain gauge is the standard instrument for ground-based precipitation measurements and rain gauge networks play an important role in the monitoring of disasters caused by heavy rainfall, such as flooding and landslides. Many authors have contributed to the research of sophisticated methods and techniques for the design of optimal rain gauge networks, including guidelines for the placement of the devices based on the meteorological and physiographic factors of the study area, however, there is not a consensus on the best procedure to locate these equipment. In fact, there is a rapid growing interest and need for the improvement of monitoring networks and the optimization algorithms and solvers allowed a rapid evolution toward more efficient models. This study presents a systematic literature review (SLR) of studies on the optimization of rain gauge networks using the PRISMA protocol, detailing the study areas, methods, datasets and models used. To the best of authors’ knowledge, the latest thorough SLR on this subject was published in 2009 by the time of development of the authors’ research, however, the amount of research on this topic has grown significantly since then and optimization techniques have undergone a compelling evolution. Results indicate a wide variety of applications, objectives, methods, models and algorithms aimed at optimizing rain gauge networks. Conclusions are drawn in the light of the opportunities for future research on this topic.

Suggested Citation

  • de Oliveira Simoyama, Felipe & Croope, Silvana & de Salles Neto, Luiz Leduino & Santos, Leonardo Bacelar Lima, 2023. "Optimization of rain gauge networks—A systematic literature review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:86:y:2023:i:c:s0038012122002701
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012122002701
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101469?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yongxin Liao & Fernando Deschamps & Eduardo de Freitas Rocha Loures & Luiz Felipe Pierin Ramos, 2017. "Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 - a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(12), pages 3609-3629, June.
    2. Chun-dan Cheng & Shin-jen Cheng & Jet-chau Wen & Ju-huang Lee, 2012. "Effects of Raingauge Distribution on Estimation Accuracy of Areal Rainfall," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Zhaokai Yin & Weihong Liao & Xiaohui Lei & Hao Wang & Ruojia Wang, 2018. "Comparing the Hydrological Responses of Conceptual and Process-Based Models with Varying Rain Gauge Density and Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    4. André Hanelt & René Bohnsack & David Marz & Cláudia Antunes Marante, 2021. "A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1159-1197, July.
    5. Richard Church & Charles R. Velle, 1974. "The Maximal Covering Location Problem," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 101-118, January.
    6. Mark S. Daskin, 2008. "What you should know about location modeling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(4), pages 283-294, June.
    7. Bardia Bayat & Mohsen Nasseri & Khosrow Hosseini & Hojat Karami, 2021. "Nested Augmentation of Rainfall Monitoring Network: Proposing a Hybrid Implementation of Block Kriging and Entropy Theory," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(13), pages 4665-4680, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Haoxiang & Zou, Yuncheng & Chen, Ya & Long, Jiancheng, 2021. "Optimal locations and electricity prices for dynamic wireless charging links of electric vehicles for sustainable transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Luo, Xiaoling & Fan, Wenbo, 2023. "Joint design of electric bus transit service and wireless charging facilities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Richard L Church & Carlos A Baez, 2020. "Generating optimal and near-optimal solutions to facility location problems," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(6), pages 1014-1030, July.
    4. Christoph Stallkamp & Florian Diehlmann & Markus Lüttenberg & Marcus Wiens & Rebekka Volk & Frank Schultmann, 2022. "On the combination of water emergency wells and mobile treatment systems: a case study of the city of Berlin," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 259-290, December.
    5. Michael J. Brusco, 2022. "Solving Classic Discrete Facility Location Problems Using Excel Spreadsheets," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 160-171, May.
    6. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Fallah, Samira & Ruiz, Rubén & Hosseini, Sara & Asgari, Nasrin, 2019. "OR models in urban service facility location: A critical review of applications and future developments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 1-27.
    7. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner, 2019. "Cooperative Cover of Uniform Demand," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 819-831, September.
    8. Sony, Michael & Naik, Subhash, 2020. "Industry 4.0 integration with socio-technical systems theory: A systematic review and proposed theoretical model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    9. Rizvi, Syed Kumail Abbas & Rahat, Birjees & Naqvi, Bushra & Umar, Muhammad, 2024. "Revolutionizing finance: The synergy of fintech, digital adoption, and innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    10. Huizhu Wang & Jianqin Zhou, 2023. "Location of Railway Emergency Rescue Spots Based on a Near-Full Covering Problem: From a Perspective of Diverse Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Markus Menz & Sven Kunisch & Julian Birkinshaw & David J. Collis & Nicolai J. Foss & Robert E. Hoskisson & John E. Prescott, 2021. "Corporate Strategy and the Theory of the Firm in the Digital Age," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(7), pages 1695-1720, November.
    12. Rekettye, Gábor & Rekettye, Gábor, 2019. "The Effects of Digitalization on Customer Experience," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2019), Rovinj, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Rovinj, Croatia, 12-14 September 2019, pages 414-420, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    13. Deist, Maximilian K. & McDowell, William C. & Bouncken, Ricarda B., 2023. "Digital units and digital innovation: Balancing fluidity and stability for the Creation, Conversion, and Dissemination of sticky knowledge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    14. Christoph March & Ina Schieferdecker, 2021. "Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky," CESifo Working Paper Series 9139, CESifo.
    15. Li, Xin & Pan, Yanchun & Jiang, Shiqiang & Huang, Qiang & Chen, Zhimin & Zhang, Mingxia & Zhang, Zuoyao, 2021. "Locate vaccination stations considering travel distance, operational cost, and work schedule," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    16. Ismael Cristofer Baierle & Francisco Tardelli da Silva & Ricardo Gonçalves de Faria Correa & Jones Luís Schaefer & Matheus Becker Da Costa & Guilherme Brittes Benitez & Elpidio Oscar Benitez Nara, 2022. "Competitiveness of Food Industry in the Era of Digital Transformation towards Agriculture 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Fatih Gurcan & Gizem Dilan Boztas & Gonca Gokce Menekse Dalveren & Mohammad Derawi, 2023. "Digital Transformation Strategies, Practices, and Trends: A Large-Scale Retrospective Study Based on Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, May.
    18. Jiwon Baik & Alan T. Murray, 2022. "Locating a facility to simultaneously address access and coverage goals," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(5), pages 1199-1217, October.
    19. Ospina, Juan P. & Duque, Juan C. & Botero-Fernández, Verónica & Montoya, Alejandro, 2022. "The maximal covering bicycle network design problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 222-236.
    20. Fadda, Edoardo & Manerba, Daniele & Cabodi, Gianpiero & Camurati, Paolo Enrico & Tadei, Roberto, 2021. "Comparative analysis of models and performance indicators for optimal service facility location," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:86:y:2023:i:c:s0038012122002701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.