IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v80y2022ics0038012121001683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ensuring multidimensional equality in public service

Author

Listed:
  • Akoluk, Damla
  • Karsu, Özlem

Abstract

Service planning problems typically involve decisions that lead to the distribution of multiple benefits to multiple users, and hence include equality and efficiency concerns in a multidimensional way. We develop two mathematical modeling-based approaches that incorporate these concerns in such problems. The first formulation aggregates the multidimensional efficiency and equality (equitability) concerns in a biobjective model. The second formulation defines an objective function for each benefit, which maximizes the total social welfare obtained from that specific benefit distribution; this results in an n-objective model, where n is the number of benefits. We illustrate and compare these approaches on an example public service provision problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Akoluk, Damla & Karsu, Özlem, 2022. "Ensuring multidimensional equality in public service," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:80:y:2022:i:c:s0038012121001683
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012121001683
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaynar, Nur & Karsu, Özlem, 2018. "Equitable decision making approaches over allocations of multiple benefits to multiple entities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 85-98.
    2. Lelo, Keti & Monni, Salvatore & Tomassi, Federico, 2019. "Socio-spatial inequalities and urban transformation. The case of Rome districts," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Dimitris Bertsimas & Vivek F. Farias & Nikolaos Trichakis, 2011. "The Price of Fairness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 17-31, February.
    4. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec, 2014. "Incorporating balance concerns in resource allocation decisions: A bi-criteria modelling approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 70-82.
    5. Naldi, Maurizio & Nicosia, Gaia & Pacifici, Andrea & Pferschy, Ulrich, 2019. "Profit-fairness trade-off in project selection," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 133-146.
    6. Nicosia, Gaia & Pacifici, Andrea & Pferschy, Ulrich, 2017. "Price of Fairness for allocating a bounded resource," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 933-943.
    7. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec, 2015. "Inequity averse optimization in operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 343-359.
    8. J. N. Hooker & H. P. Williams, 2012. "Combining Equity and Utilitarianism in a Mathematical Programming Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(9), pages 1682-1693, September.
    9. Mai, Feng & Fry, Michael J. & Raturi, Amitabh S., 2016. "Supply-chain performance anomalies: Fairness concerns under private cost informationAuthor-Name: Qin, Fei," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 170-182.
    10. Anthony F. Shorrocks, 1983. "The Impact of Income Components on the Distribution of Family Incomes," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 98(2), pages 311-326.
    11. Christopher N. Gross & Jens O. Brunner & Manfred Blobner, 2019. "Hospital physicians can’t get no long-term satisfaction – an indicator for fairness in preference fulfillment on duty schedules," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 691-708, December.
    12. Alfredo Marín & Stefan Nickel & Sebastian Velten, 2010. "An extended covering model for flexible discrete and equity location problems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 71(1), pages 125-163, February.
    13. Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz & Sliwinski, Tomasz, 2003. "On solving linear programs with the ordered weighted averaging objective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 80-91, July.
    14. Özlem Karsu & Hale Erkan, 2020. "Balance in resource allocation problems: a changing reference approach," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(1), pages 297-326, March.
    15. Atkinson, Anthony B., 1970. "On the measurement of inequality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 244-263, September.
    16. T R P Ramos & R C Oliveira, 2011. "Delimitation of service areas in reverse logistics networks with multiple depots," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(7), pages 1198-1210, July.
    17. Acuna, Jorge A. & Zayas-Castro, José L. & Charkhgard, Hadi, 2020. "Ambulance allocation optimization model for the overcrowding problem in US emergency departments: A case study in Florida," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    18. Turkcan, Ayten & Zeng, Bo & Muthuraman, Kumar & Lawley, Mark, 2011. "Sequential clinical scheduling with service criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 780-795, November.
    19. de la Torre, Luis E. & Dolinskaya, Irina S. & Smilowitz, Karen R., 2012. "Disaster relief routing: Integrating research and practice," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 88-97.
    20. Burkey, M.L. & Bhadury, J. & Eiselt, H.A., 2012. "A location-based comparison of health care services in four U.S. states with efficiency and equity," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 157-163.
    21. Wlodzimierz Ogryczak & Hanan Luss & Dritan Nace & Michał Pióro, 2014. "Fair Optimization and Networks: Models, Algorithms, and Applications," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-3, September.
    22. Medaglia, Andres L. & Hueth, Darrell & Mendieta, Juan Carlos & Sefair, Jorge A., 2008. "A multiobjective model for the selection and timing of public enterprise projects," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 31-45, March.
    23. Cortinhal, Maria João & Mourão, Maria Cândida & Nunes, Ana Catarina, 2016. "Local search heuristics for sectoring routing in a household waste collection context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(1), pages 68-79.
    24. Kostreva, Michael M. & Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz & Wierzbicki, Adam, 2004. "Equitable aggregations and multiple criteria analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 362-377, October.
    25. Sen, Amartya, 1973. "On Economic Inequality," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198281931.
    26. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec & Argyris, Nikos, 2018. "Capturing preferences for inequality aversion in decision support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 686-706.
    27. Messinger, Paul R., 2016. "The role of fairness in competitive supply chain relationships: An experimental studyAuthor-Name: Choi, Sungchul," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 798-813.
    28. Yoshiaki Ohsawa & Naoya Ozaki & Frank Plastria, 2008. "Equity-Efficiency Bicriteria Location with Squared Euclidean Distances," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 79-87, February.
    29. Jagtenberg, C.J. & Mason, A.J., 2020. "Improving fairness in ambulance planning by time sharing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(3), pages 1095-1107.
    30. Burak Bilgin & Patrick Causmaecker & Benoît Rossie & Greet Vanden Berghe, 2012. "Local search neighbourhoods for dealing with a novel nurse rostering model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 194(1), pages 33-57, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec, 2015. "Inequity averse optimization in operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 343-359.
    2. Argyris, Nikolaos & Karsu, Özlem & Yavuz, Mirel, 2022. "Fair resource allocation: Using welfare-based dominance constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 560-578.
    3. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec & Argyris, Nikos, 2018. "Capturing preferences for inequality aversion in decision support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 686-706.
    4. Naldi, Maurizio & Nicosia, Gaia & Pacifici, Andrea & Pferschy, Ulrich, 2019. "Profit-fairness trade-off in project selection," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 133-146.
    5. Bashir Bashir & Özlem Karsu, 2022. "Solution approaches for equitable multiobjective integer programming problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 967-995, April.
    6. Kaynar, Nur & Karsu, Özlem, 2018. "Equitable decision making approaches over allocations of multiple benefits to multiple entities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 85-98.
    7. David Rea & Craig Froehle & Suzanne Masterson & Brian Stettler & Gregory Fermann & Arthur Pancioli, 2021. "Unequal but Fair: Incorporating Distributive Justice in Operational Allocation Models," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2304-2320, July.
    8. Dukkanci, Okan & Karsu, Özlem & Kara, Bahar Y., 2022. "Planning sustainable routes: Economic, environmental and welfare concerns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 110-123.
    9. Gutjahr, Walter J., 2021. "Inequity-averse stochastic decision processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 258-270.
    10. Juan Antonio Duro & Jordi Teixidó-Figueras & Emilio Padilla, 2017. "The Causal Factors of International Inequality in $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 Emissions Per Capita: A Regression-Based Inequality Decomposition Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(4), pages 683-700, August.
    11. Spencer Leitch & Zhiyuan Wei, 2024. "Improving spatial access to healthcare facilities: an integrated approach with spatial analysis and optimization modeling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(2), pages 1057-1074, October.
    12. Agnetis, Alessandro & Chen, Bo & Nicosia, Gaia & Pacifici, Andrea, 2019. "Price of fairness in two-agent single-machine scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 79-87.
    13. Juan Antonio Duro & Jordi Teixidó-Figueras & Emilio Padilla, 2014. "The causal factors of international inequality in co2 emissions per capita: a regression-based inequality decomposition analysis," Working Papers 2014/20, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    14. Breugem, Thomas & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 2022. "The price of imposing vertical equity through asymmetric outcome constraints," Other publications TiSEM b6e85652-c54a-4597-a32e-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Li, Linda & Firouz, Mohammad & Ahmed, Abdulaziz & Delen, Dursun, 2023. "On the Egalitarian–Utilitarian spectrum in stochastic capacitated resource allocation problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    16. Aziz, Haris & Huang, Xin & Mattei, Nicholas & Segal-Halevi, Erel, 2023. "Computing welfare-Maximizing fair allocations of indivisible goods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 773-784.
    17. Maria Barbati & Giuseppe Bruno & Alfredo Marín, 2016. "Balancing the arrival times of users in a two-stage location problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 273-288, November.
    18. Wolbeck, Lena Antonia, 2019. "Fairness aspects in personnel scheduling," Discussion Papers 2019/16, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    19. Hussein El Hajj & Douglas R. Bish & Ebru K. Bish, 2021. "Equity in genetic newborn screening," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(1), pages 44-64, February.
    20. Sun, Lishan & Lu, Huabo & Xu, Yan & Kong, Dewen & Shao, Juan, 2022. "Fairness-oriented train service design for urban rail transit cross-line operation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 606(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:80:y:2022:i:c:s0038012121001683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.