IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v29y2013i4p394-401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do I look right? De-familiarizing the organizational fashioning of the body

Author

Listed:
  • King, Ian W.
  • Vickery, Jonathan

Abstract

In this exploratory study, we use fashion as a means of opening our understanding to how the informal, seemingly random and ‘taken for granted’ task of clothing oneself belies a series of processes internal to the economy of organizational life. While fashion is not an established object of research in management and organization studies, we use the concept of fashion as an heuristic in defining the various ways in which the body, in the process of sensory and self-reflective presentation (dressing), is significant in understanding certain forms of organizational ‘knowing’. We explore this as a yet undefined area of organizational study by using the art methodology of ‘defamiliarization’. Appropriate to this methodology, we structure our study of fashion in terms of ‘experience’, ‘language’ and ‘knowledge’. Each of these, and the intrinsic relation between them, breach the conventional boundaries of management and organization studies in productive ways.

Suggested Citation

  • King, Ian W. & Vickery, Jonathan, 2013. "Do I look right? De-familiarizing the organizational fashioning of the body," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 394-401.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:29:y:2013:i:4:p:394-401
    DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2013.07.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522113000675
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.07.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbara Czarniawska & Fabrizio Panozzo, 2008. "Preface: Trends and Fashions in Management Studies," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 3-4, January.
    2. Barbara Czarniawska & Fabrizio Panozzo, 2008. "Preface: Trends and Fashions in Management Studies," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 3-12, January.
    3. Abrahamson, Eric, 2009. "Necessary conditions for the study of fads and fashions in science," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 235-239, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuel Sánchez-Pérez & Nuria Rueda-López & María Belén Marín-Carrillo & Eduardo Terán-Yépez, 2021. "Theoretical dilemmas, conceptual review and perspectives disclosure of the sharing economy: a qualitative analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 1849-1883, October.
    2. Jesús de Frutos-Belizón & Fernando Martín-Alcázar & Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey, 2021. "The research–practice gap in the field of HRM: a qualitative study from the academic side of the gap," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1465-1515, August.
    3. Damien Besancenot & Radu Vranceanu, 2015. "Fear Of Novelty: A Model Of Scientific Discovery With Strategic Uncertainty," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 53(2), pages 1132-1139, April.
    4. Slobodan Adzic, 2018. "Learning organization: a fine example of a management fad," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 14(3), pages 477-487, June.
    5. repec:hal:cepnwp:hal-01117929 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Pawel Sobkowicz, 2015. "Innovation Suppression and Clique Evolution in Peer-Review-Based, Competitive Research Funding Systems: An Agent-Based Model," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 18(2), pages 1-13.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:29:y:2013:i:4:p:394-401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.