IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v27y2011i1p160-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dialogues and the problems of knowing: Reinventing the architectural competition

Author

Listed:
  • Kreiner, Kristian
  • Jacobsen, Peter Holm
  • Jensen, Daniel Toft

Abstract

Summary We describe and analyze the introduction of legitimate dialogues in architectural competitions. What happens to the competition when the contestants are allowed to interact with each other and with the competition jury? We consider dialogues to be a supplementary social technology that is becoming embedded in well-known forms of architectural competitions. By enabling feedback on preliminary design ideas and solutions, the dialogues are meant to accelerate processes of clarification and learning, and to enable the contestants to implement changes and improvements during the development of their final design entries. However, in an empirical study the actual effects proved less straight-forward. The feedback allowed the architects to react and adapt, but in some cases they reacted and adapted in ways which they later regretted. By showing that feedback may also mislead the architectural teams to draw wrong implications we are sensitized to the inherent problems in knowing certain things ahead of time. We elaborate on this dilemma and suggest some implications for the theory and management of architectural competitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kreiner, Kristian & Jacobsen, Peter Holm & Jensen, Daniel Toft, 2011. "Dialogues and the problems of knowing: Reinventing the architectural competition," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 160-166, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:27:y:2011:i:1:p:160-166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522110001399
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williamson, Oliver E, 1979. "Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractural Relations," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(2), pages 233-261, October.
    2. Paul R. Carlile, 2002. "A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 442-455, August.
    3. Haridimos Tsoukas, 2009. "A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(6), pages 941-957, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manzoni, Beatrice & Volker, Leentje, 2017. "Paradoxes and management approaches of competing for work in creative professional service firms," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 23-35.
    2. Mouritsen, Jan & Kreiner, Kristian, 2016. "Accounting, decisions and promises," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 21-31.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Jonsson & Maria Grafström & Mikael Klintman, 2022. "Unboxing knowledge in collaboration between academia and society: A story about conceptions and epistemic uncertainty [De-essentializing the Knowledge Intensive Firm: Reflections on Skeptical Resea," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 583-597.
    2. Paola Perez-Aleman, 2011. "Collective Learning in Global Diffusion: Spreading Quality Standards in a Developing Country Cluster," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 173-189, February.
    3. Sylvain Lenfle & Jonas Söderlund, 2019. "Large-Scale Innovative Projects as Temporary Trading Zones: Toward an Interlanguage Theory," Post-Print hal-02390158, HAL.
    4. Michael J.D. Roberts & Paul W. Beamish, 2017. "The Scaffolding Activities of International Returnee Executives: A Learning Based Perspective of Global Boundary Spanning," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 511-539, June.
    5. Samer Faraj & Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa & Ann Majchrzak, 2011. "Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1224-1239, October.
    6. Lorino, Philippe & Mourey, Damien, 2013. "The experience of time in the inter-organizing inquiry: A present thickened by dialog and situations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 48-62.
    7. Ann Majchrzak & Philip H. B. More & Samer Faraj, 2012. "Transcending Knowledge Differences in Cross-Functional Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 951-970, August.
    8. Robyn Thomas & Leisa D. Sargent & Cynthia Hardy, 2011. "Managing Organizational Change: Negotiating Meaning and Power-Resistance Relations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 22-41, February.
    9. Alberto Franco, L., 2013. "Rethinking Soft OR interventions: Models as boundary objects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(3), pages 720-733.
    10. repec:hal:journl:hal-00714343 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Anne-Laure Fayard & Anca Metiu, 2014. "The Role of Writing in Distributed Collaboration," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1391-1413, October.
    12. Lorino, Philippe, 2012. "Management Systems as Organizational "Architextures": The Tacit Narrative Frames of Collective Activity," ESSEC Working Papers WP1208, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    13. Qureshi, Israr & Bhatt, Babita & Sutter, Christopher & Shukla, Dhirendra Mani, 2023. "Social entrepreneurship and intersectionality: Mitigating extreme exclusion," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2).
    14. Edoardo Fregonese & Isabella M. Lami & Elena Todella, 2020. "Aesthetic Perspectives in Group Decision and Negotiation Practice," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 993-1019, December.
    15. Philippe Lorino, 2012. "Management Systems as Organizational "Architextures": The Tacit Narrative Frames of Collective Activity," Working Papers hal-00714343, HAL.
    16. Andreas P. J. Schotter & Ram Mudambi & Yves L. Doz & Ajai Gaur, 2017. "Boundary Spanning in Global Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 403-421, June.
    17. Claudio Biscaro & Anna Comacchio, 2018. "Knowledge Creation Across Worldviews: How Metaphors Impact and Orient Group Creativity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 289(1), pages 58-79, February.
    18. Martha S. Feldman & Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2011. "Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1240-1253, October.
    19. Antoine Harfouche & Bernard Quinio & Sana Rouis Skandrani & Rolande Marciniak, 2017. "A Framework for Artificial Knowledge Creation in Organizations," Post-Print hal-03110617, HAL.
    20. Hani Safadi & Steven L. Johnson & Samer Faraj, 2021. "Who Contributes Knowledge? Core-Periphery Tension in Online Innovation Communities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 752-775, May.
    21. Daniel Beverungen & Oliver Müller & Martin Matzner & Jan Mendling & Jan Brocke, 2019. "Conceptualizing smart service systems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(1), pages 7-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:27:y:2011:i:1:p:160-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.