IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v71y2024ics0275531924002010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative or complacent: The impact of financial conditions on firms’ strategic innovation activities—A game-theoretical approach

Author

Listed:
  • Moon, Byunggeor

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of Research and Development (R&D) program conditions on strategic project selection within firms, employing a game-theoretic approach. It hypothesizes that firms align their optimal project choices with the broader objectives akin to a social planner’s perspective. The developed theoretical model forecasts behavioral patterns of firms under varied R&D program conditions, which is substantiated by empirical analysis within the unique quasi-experimental policy environment of South Korea. According to the model, firms facing higher financial costs are inclined to select projects with lower probabilities of success but potentially higher returns (high risk-high reward), in contrast to those with lower costs, which prefer projects with higher success probabilities but lower returns (low risk-modest reward). The findings from both theoretical projections and empirical validation suggest that the financial circumstances significantly shape the innovation dynamics within firms’ R&D activities. These results underscore the need for careful consideration of these factors in the design and implementation of R&D financing policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Moon, Byunggeor, 2024. "Innovative or complacent: The impact of financial conditions on firms’ strategic innovation activities—A game-theoretical approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:71:y:2024:i:c:s0275531924002010
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924002010
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:71:y:2024:i:c:s0275531924002010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.