IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v60y2022ics0275531921002191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do investors listen? Exploring the effect of investor relationship management on firm-specific stock return variation

Author

Listed:
  • Gupta, Paramita
  • He, Dan
  • Ma, Yulong
  • Yur-Austin, Jasmine

Abstract

In this study, we combine the National Investor Relations Institute Index of Marketization of China’s Provinces 2016 report with Nankai University’s investor relationship management index to examine the influence of investor relationship management on firm-specific stock return variation. Our results indicate a significant positive relationship between a firm’s investor relationship management and the magnitude of firm-specific return variation in its stock. Our results further show that the relationship varies across different regions in China due to differences in the institutional environment. Specifically, firms in regions with a high level of marketization, a high degree of rule of law, and a low degree of government intervention exhibit a stronger relationship. These results provide important implications for policy makers and corporate managers and help enhance corporate governance and firm valuation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gupta, Paramita & He, Dan & Ma, Yulong & Yur-Austin, Jasmine, 2022. "Do investors listen? Exploring the effect of investor relationship management on firm-specific stock return variation," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:60:y:2022:i:c:s0275531921002191
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531921002191
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101598?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kan Li & Randall Morck & Fan Yang & Bernard Yeung, 2004. "Firm-Specific Variation and Openness in Emerging Markets," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 86(3), pages 658-669, August.
    2. Jin, Li & Myers, Stewart C., 2006. "R2 around the world: New theory and new tests," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 257-292, February.
    3. Bae, Kee-Hong & Ozoguz, Arzu & Tan, Hongping & Wirjanto, Tony S., 2012. "Do foreigners facilitate information transmission in emerging markets?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 209-227.
    4. Inaba, Kei-Ichiro, 2020. "Information-driven stock return comovements across countries," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    5. repec:bla:jfinan:v:59:y:2004:i:1:p:65-105 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Unknown, 2014. "Media Coverage 2014," 2014: Ethics, Efficiency and Food Security: Feeding the 9 Billion, Well, 26-28 August 2014 225573, Crawford Fund.
    7. Michael J. Brennan & Claudia Tamarowski, 2000. "Investor Relations, Liquidity, And Stock Prices," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 12(4), pages 26-37, January.
    8. Gul, Ferdinand A. & Kim, Jeong-Bon & Qiu, Annie A., 2010. "Ownership concentration, foreign shareholding, audit quality, and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 425-442, March.
    9. Ding, Yuan & Hope, Ole-Kristian & Jeanjean, Thomas & Stolowy, Herve, 2007. "Differences between domestic accounting standards and IAS: Measurement, determinants and implications," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 1-38.
    10. El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane & Kwok, Chuck C.Y. & Mishra, Dev R., 2011. "Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 2388-2406, September.
    11. Gregory S. Miller, 2006. "The Press as a Watchdog for Accounting Fraud," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 1001-1033, December.
    12. Hutton, Amy P. & Marcus, Alan J. & Tehranian, Hassan, 2009. "Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 67-86, October.
    13. Goodell, John & Li, Mingsheng & Liu, Desheng, 2021. "Price informativeness and state-owned enterprises: Considering their heterogeneity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    14. Bae, Kee-Hong & Bailey, Warren & Mao, Connie X., 2006. "Stock market liberalization and the information environment," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 404-428, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaozhen Pan & Gengxi Xu & Nina Zhu, 2022. "Spatial Peer Effect of Enterprises’ Digital Transformation: Empirical Evidence from Spatial Autoregressive Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Wu, Haoyang & Jiao, Ziyan & Wang, Shipeng & Wu, Zhiruo, 2024. "Corporate mergers and acquisitions: A strategic approach to mitigate expected default frequency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Wang, Jun, 2023. "The impact of investor communication on enterprise green innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    4. Li, Haoyang & Yang, Mingjing & Chan, Kam C. & Gao, Shenghao, 2022. "Do institutional investors’ corporate site visits impact seasoned equity offering discounts? Evidence from detailed investor bids in SEO auctions," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Donghua Zhou & Yujie Zhao & Philip T Lin & Bin Li & Adrian (Waikong) Cheung, 2019. "Can microblogging information disclosure reduce stock price synchronicity? Evidence from China," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(2), pages 282-305, May.
    2. Li, Qinyang & Liu, Xiangqiang & Chen, Jing & Wang, Huaixin, 2022. "Does stock market liberalization reduce stock price synchronicity? —Evidence from the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 25-38.
    3. Yan Meng & Lingyun Xiong & Lijuan Xiao & Min Bai, 2023. "The effect of overseas investors on local market efficiency: evidence from the Shanghai/Shenzhen–Hong Kong Stock Connect," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-32, December.
    4. Dang, Tung Lam & Dang, Man & Hoang, Luong & Nguyen, Lily & Phan, Hoang Long, 2020. "Media coverage and stock price synchronicity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Cheng, Louis T.W. & Wang, Jacqueline Wenjie, 2021. "Equity ownership and corporate transparency: International evidence," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 143-165.
    6. Zhao, Yuyang & Xiang, Cheng & Cai, Wenwu, 2021. "Stock market liberalization and institutional herding: Evidence from the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connects," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    7. Fu, Junhui & Chen, Xingwei & Liu, Yufang & Chen, Rongda, 2022. "Managerial ability and stock price synchronicity," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    8. Chen, Yuyang & Wang, Xinlu & Chen, Kun, 2023. "Stock market liberalization and pay for market-based performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Liu, Xiangqiang & Yang, Qingqing & Wei, Kai & Dai, Peng-Fei, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and idiosyncratic return volatility: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    10. Kim, Jeong-Bon & Zhang, Hao & Li, Liuchuang & Tian, Gaoliang, 2014. "Press freedom, externally-generated transparency, and stock price informativeness: International evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 299-310.
    11. Xia, Jingjing, 2023. "Redrawing the line: Narrowly beating analyst forecasts and journalists’ co-coverage choices in earnings-related news articles," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
    12. Kee-Hong Bae & Jin-Mo Kim & Yang Ni, 2013. "Is Firm-specific Return Variation a Measure of Information Efficiency?," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 13(4), pages 407-445, December.
    13. Li, Donghui & Xing, Lu & Zhao, Yang, 2022. "Does extended auditor disclosure deter managerial bad-news hoarding? Evidence from crash risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    14. Shan, Yuan George, 2019. "Do corporate governance and disclosure tone drive voluntary disclosure of related-party transactions in China?," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 30-48.
    15. Wang, Wei & Cheng, Sijia & Nahar, Shamsun & Alhaleh, Shadi Emad Areef & Wang, Hua, 2022. "Does mixed-ownership reform restrain stock price synchronicity? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 390-404.
    16. Meng, Qingbin & Song, Xuan & Liu, Chunlin & Wu, Qun & Zeng, Hongchao, 2020. "The impact of block trades on stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 239-253.
    17. Wang, Kai & Zhao, Jingjing & Zhou, Jun, 2024. "Online sales and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PA).
    18. Liu, Chao & Wang, FeiFei & Xue, Wenjun, 2023. "The annual report tone and return Comovement—Evidence from China's stock market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Lin, Tse-Chun & Liu, Jinyu & Ni, Xiaoran, 2022. "Foreign bank entry deregulation and stock market stability: Evidence from staggered regulatory changes," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 185-207.
    20. Li, Qian & Liu, Shangqun, 2023. "Does alternative data reduce stock price crash risk? Evidence from third-party online sales disclosure in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:60:y:2022:i:c:s0275531921002191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.