IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v88y2023icp1389-1396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is ChatGPT competent? Heterogeneity in the cognitive schemas of financial auditors and robots

Author

Listed:
  • Wei, Tian
  • Wu, Han
  • Chu, Gang

Abstract

The constraints of ChatGPT, as an intelligent conversational robot, in mimicking complex human activities have created doubts about its competence in the financial profession. Prior research has shown that the limitations of such robots result from differences between human and artificial cognitive structures, such as differences in structural approaches to interpreting information by organizing knowledge. However, explanations of how such differences are associated with human characteristics remain limited. This study focuses on one specific finance profession, that of financial auditors, to demonstrate how ChatGPT shows advances that mean it can be argued to imitate financial auditors with longer tenures. Our findings suggest possible applications and limitations of ChatGPT in light of these advances.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei, Tian & Wu, Han & Chu, Gang, 2023. "Is ChatGPT competent? Heterogeneity in the cognitive schemas of financial auditors and robots," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1389-1396.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:88:y:2023:i:c:p:1389-1396
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056023003180
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berkeley J. Dietvorst & Joseph P. Simmons & Cade Massey, 2018. "Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: People Will Use Imperfect Algorithms If They Can (Even Slightly) Modify Them," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1155-1170, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agbon, Gildas, 2024. "Who speaks through the machine? Generative AI as discourse and implications for management," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Song, Piaopeng & Lu, Hanglin & Zhang, Yongjie, 2024. "Unveiling tone manipulation in MD&A: Evidence from ChatGPT experiments," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimitris Bertsimas & Agni Orfanoudaki, 2021. "Algorithmic Insurance," Papers 2106.00839, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    2. Bryce McLaughlin & Jann Spiess, 2022. "Algorithmic Assistance with Recommendation-Dependent Preferences," Papers 2208.07626, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    3. Markus Jung & Mischa Seiter, 2021. "Towards a better understanding on mitigating algorithm aversion in forecasting: an experimental study," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 495-516, December.
    4. Tse, Tiffany Tsz Kwan & Hanaki, Nobuyuki & Mao, Bolin, 2024. "Beware the performance of an algorithm before relying on it: Evidence from a stock price forecasting experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Kohei Kawaguchi, 2021. "When Will Workers Follow an Algorithm? A Field Experiment with a Retail Business," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1670-1695, March.
    6. Ekaterina Jussupow & Kai Spohrer & Armin Heinzl & Joshua Gawlitza, 2021. "Augmenting Medical Diagnosis Decisions? An Investigation into Physicians’ Decision-Making Process with Artificial Intelligence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 713-735, September.
    7. Martin Spann & Bernd Skiera, 2020. "Dynamische Preisgestaltung in der digitalisierten Welt [Dynamic Pricing in a Digitized World]," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 321-342, September.
    8. Johannes Habel & Sascha Alavi & Nicolas Heinitz, 2023. "A theory of predictive sales analytics adoption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 34-54, June.
    9. Bauer, Kevin & Nofer, Michael & Abdel-Karim, Benjamin M. & Hinz, Oliver, 2022. "The effects of discontinuing machine learning decision support," SAFE Working Paper Series 370, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    10. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:3:p:449-451 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Wang, Xun & Rodrigues, Vasco Sanchez & Demir, Emrah & Sarkis, Joseph, 2024. "Algorithm aversion during disruptions: The case of safety stock," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    12. Kevin Bauer & Andrej Gill, 2024. "Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Algorithmic Assessments, Transparency, and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 226-248, March.
    13. Gregory Weitzner, 2024. "Reputational Algorithm Aversion," Papers 2402.15418, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    14. Sroginis, Anna & Fildes, Robert & Kourentzes, Nikolaos, 2023. "Use of contextual and model-based information in adjusting promotional forecasts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1177-1191.
    15. Mari, Alex & Mandelli, Andreina & Algesheimer, René, 2024. "Empathic voice assistants: Enhancing consumer responses in voice commerce," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    16. Béatrice BOULU-RESHEF & Alexis DIRER & Nicole VON WILCZUR, 2022. "Algorithmic vs. Human Portfolio Choice," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2966, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    17. Alex Mari & Andreina Mandelli & René Algesheimer, 2023. "Shopping with Voice Assistants: How Empathy Affects Individual and Family Decision-Making Outcomes," Working Papers 399, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    18. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Mitra, Ranjan Kumar, 2023. "What drives managers towards algorithm aversion and how to overcome it? Mitigating the impact of innovation resistance through technology readiness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Hülter, Svenja M. & Ertel, Christian & Heidemann, Ansgar, 2024. "Exploring the individual adoption of human resource analytics: Behavioural beliefs and the role of machine learning characteristics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    20. Talia Gillis & Bryce McLaughlin & Jann Spiess, 2021. "On the Fairness of Machine-Assisted Human Decisions," Papers 2110.15310, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    21. Alain Lacroux & Christelle Martin Lacroux, 2022. "Believing Or Not In Algorithms... ? Recruiters' Perceptions And Behavior Towards Algorithms During Resume Screening [Croire Ou Ne Pas Croire Les Algorithmes… ? Perceptions Et Comportement Des Recru," Post-Print hal-04095500, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ChatGPT; Financial auditors; Cognitive schemas; Artificial intelligence;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C80 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - General
    • G00 - Financial Economics - - General - - - General
    • G41 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets
    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:88:y:2023:i:c:p:1389-1396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.